Research Article

Blind Source Parameters for Performance Evaluation of Despeckling Filters

Table 7

Comparison of performance parameters (average ± standard deviation).

MethodsIQIβFoMSMPISSIMD

DsFlsmv0.947 ± 0.0030.939 ± 0.0060.962 ± 0.0072.661 ± 0.2600.974 ± 0.00592.167 ± 6.873
DsFwiener0.865 ± 0.0050.973 ± 0.0040.946 ± 0.0162.573 ± 0.2590.989 ± 0.00128.493 ± 2.104
DsFmedian0.938 ± 0.0040.707 ± 0.0090.939 ± 0.0102.957 ± 0.2920.984 ± 0.006212.16 ± 4.13
DsFgf4d0.867 ± 0.0150.555 ± 0.0110.903 ± 0.0157.356 ± 0.4360.962 ± 0.006245.00 ± 10.00
DsFsrad0.785 ± 0.0320.987 ± 0.0030.947 ± 0.0112.682 ± 0.2900.994 ± 0.00112.770 ± 0.319
FIF0.389 ± 0.0480.950 ± 0.0011.000 ± 0.0002.628 ± 0.2920.999 ± 0.00042.002 ± 5.115
FBF0.404 ± 0.0480.974 ± 0.0000.996 ± 0.0012.597 ± 0.2950.991 ± 0.00264.09 ± 2.00
GLM0.727 ± 0.0190.991 ± 0.0060.924 ± 0.0322.571 ± 0.2580.997 ± 0.00238.21 ± 0.02
MPT0.950 ± 0.0110.868 ± 0.0080.926 ± 0.0202.790 ± 0.2720.984 ± 0.002162.00 ± 20.45
RNLA0.410 ± 0.0160.843 ± 0.0140.810 ± 0.0243.041 ± 0.2760.950 ± 0.008122.50 ± 11.46
MBR0.599 ± 0.0220.228 ± 0.0090.802 ± 0.0212.498 ± 0.2400.907 ± 0.020214.97 ± 12.2
ATV0.281 ± 0.0250.947 ± 0.0050.841 ± 0.0352.447 ± 0.2530.969 ± 0.00545.698 ± 0.514
PPB0.379 ± 0.0450.947 ± 0.0040.984 ± 0.0123.279 ± 0.2630.963 ± 0.00796.639 ± 0.400
ATMED0.876 ± 0.0050.443 ± 0.0100.948 ± 0.0113.165 ± 0.2640.978 ± 0.009202.93 ± 10.12
HATMED0.845 ± 0.0080.449 ± 0.0070.917 ± 0.0163.354 ± 0.2650.972 ± 0.011212.29 ± 0.07
GW filter0.837 ± 0.0070.968 ± 0.0050.921 ± 0.0253.137 ± 0.2840.974 ± 0.00330.80 ± 1.68
GWF20.810 ± 0.0100.418 ± 0.0090.898 ± 0.0202.549 ± 0.2650.954 ± 0.010207.98 ± 0.06
DPAD0.577 ± 0.0260.989 ± 0.0030.990 ± 0.0052.639 ± 0.2640.997 ± 0.00029.825 ± 4.202
PSBE0.923 ± 0.0020.980 ± 0.0010.991 ± 0.0022.817 ± 0.2690.993 ± 0.00389.276 ± 6.414
FBL0.766 ± 0.0190.973 ± 0.0020.818 ± 0.0392.638 ± 0.2600.992 ± 0.00151.058 ± 14.409