International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 4998786 |

Vincent A. Stadelmann, Gabrielle Boyd, Martin Guillot, Jean-Guy Bienvenu, Charles Glaus, Aurore Varela, "Automatic Quantification of Atherosclerosis in Contrast-Enhanced MicroCT Scans of Mouse Aortas Ex Vivo", International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2021, Article ID 4998786, 9 pages, 2021.

Automatic Quantification of Atherosclerosis in Contrast-Enhanced MicroCT Scans of Mouse Aortas Ex Vivo

Academic Editor: Jyh-Cheng Chen
Received15 Jul 2021
Revised24 Aug 2021
Accepted30 Aug 2021
Published21 Sep 2021


Objective. While microCT evaluation of atherosclerotic lesions in mice has been formally validated, existing image processing methods remain undisclosed. We aimed to develop and validate a reproducible image processing workflow based on phosphotungstic acid-enhanced microCT scans for the volumetric quantification of atherosclerotic lesions in entire mouse aortas. Approach and Results. 42 WT and 42 apolipoprotein E knockout mouse aortas were scanned. The walls, lumen, and plaque objects were segmented using dual-threshold algorithms. Aortic and plaque volumes were computed by voxel counting and lesion surface by triangulation. The results were validated against manual and histological evaluations. Knockout mice had a significant increase in plaque volume compared to wild types with a plaque to aorta volume ratio of 0.3%, 2.8%, and 9.8% at weeks 13, 18, and 26, respectively. Automatic segmentation correlated with manual (; ) and histological evaluations (; ). Conclusions. The semiautomatic workflow enabled rapid quantification of atherosclerotic plaques in mice with minimal manual work.

1. Introduction

The ApoE-/- mouse is the most commonly used animal model for studying atherosclerosis. Its primary advantages include ease in handling and rapid formation of the disease [1]. Histological methods are the reference for quantifying atherosclerosis in preclinical models [2]. The aortic root (Paigen) method is predominantly used [3], although only a limited area of the aorta is analyzed; alternately, the en face method can evaluate lesions along the whole aorta [4]. Both methods are time-consuming and costly. Adequate characterization of the heterogeneity of atherosclerotic lesions within the aorta would, in fact, require a tight series of tissue sections, but a true three-dimensional method would be the obvious alternative.

MicroCT is a high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging tool commonly available in preclinical labs [5]. Since 1998, microCT was used to assess vasculature [6] and quantify atherosclerosis lesions in autopsy specimens [7], but image quality was limited by poor contrast between tissues. Contrast agent-enhanced microCT can overcome this issue, whereby visualization of atherosclerosis in ApoE-/- mice with microCT has been achieved with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) [8]. Lloyd et al. validated a quantification method with PTA-enhanced microCT against en face histology and found excellent agreement for both plaque surface area and plaque volume [9]. In their study, however, image processing was outsourced and the article did not provide sufficient detail to ensure methodological reproducibility.

Our aim was to develop an automated image processing workflow based on PTA-enhanced microCT scans for the volumetric quantification of atherosclerotic plaques and lesions in entire ApoE-/- mouse aortas. Further work involved validating this method against a histology reference, manual segmentation, and previous preclinical data as well as describing it in sufficient detail for reproducibility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Protocols

For this study, we analyzed aortas from 42 ApoE-/- and 42 control (WT) C57BL/6 female mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). The protocol for the care and use of our study animals was reviewed and approved by the Charles River Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted under guidance from the USA National Research Council and Canadian Council on Animal Care.

The animals were housed under standardized conditions and placed on an ad libitum high-fat diet (TD.88137, 42% from fat) (Envigo RMS, Indianapolis, IN) starting at 6 weeks old to ensure steady plaque development throughout the study period [10]. All animals were ovariectomized at 8 weeks following standardized protocols [11]. They were euthanized at 13, 18, and 26 weeks of age ( mice/group/time point) under isoflurane anesthesia and whole-body cardiac perfusion as described elsewhere [12].

The aortas in situ (remaining attached to the heart, ribs, vertebrae, and kidneys) were then dissected and kept in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for days at room temperature during which time all perivascular adipose tissue was removed. Aortas were stained in a 5% PTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Canada) for hours, rinsed 3 times for minutes in phosphate-buffered saline, and wrapped in plastic film to avoid evaporation of the reagent during scanning.

2.2. MicroCT
2.2.1. Image Acquisition

Each PTA-stained sample was positioned vertically in a ⌀ 19 mm holder and scanned in a cabinet cone-beam microCT scanner (uCT100; Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland). The X-ray tube was operated at 55 kVp/145 μA with a 0.5 mm aluminum filter. Exposure time was 1000 ms/projection for 1000 projections/180°. The slices were reconstructed into voxel images with a 10 μm voxel size (scan volume:  mm). Before further processing, images were cropped to a volume of interest from the aortic arch (using valves as landmarks) down to the major portion of the descending arch.

2.3. Image Processing Workflow

We developed a semiautomatic workflow to segment aorta wall, lumen, atherosclerotic plaques, and lesions from PTA-enhanced microCT scans. The algorithms were designed primarily to quantify plaques and lesions with a minimum amount of human intervention and be processed natively on the microCT computer system (without further data export or conversions). The workflow comprises five steps: (1) manual contouring of arterial region of interest (ROI), (2) automatic segmentation of walls and lumen, (3) manual verification of the lumen contour (and correction as necessary), (4) automatic segmentation of plaques, and (5) automatic quantification of plaques and lesions and three-dimensional rendering. The algorithms were developed using EasyIPL (, a high-level library of macros using the scanner software IPL (Scanco Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) and the scripting language DCL of the scanner operating system, OpenVMS (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA).

2.3.1. Manual and Autocontouring Process

The first two workflow steps define a mask of the aortic lumen, which is later used as a ROI for plaque segmentation. Firstly, the aortic ROI—comprising the ascending aorta starting from the valves, the aortic arch, and 1 cm of the descending aorta caudal to the ostium of the left subclavian artery—is manually identified. The outer contour of the aorta is manually drawn at regular intervals (typically 10 contours over the specimen length), and the full ROI is then interpolated automatically (Figure 1(a)).

In a second step, a fixed threshold ( cm-1) is applied to the grayscale data within the aortic ROI to generate a draft of the aortic walls (Figure 1(b)). A closed aortic wall mask is necessary to define the lumen at a later stage, but the draft can be imperfect if highly stained plaques are attached to the wall or if insufficiently stained wall regions and arterial branches create discontinuities in the walls. The aortic wall draft is therefore closed by eroding the aortic ROI by two voxels and overlaying it to the draft walls (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). This new object is inverted, and the inside volume is used as a draft of the lumen (Figure 1(e)). Sometimes highly stained plaques can be confounded with the wall during thresholding, which leaves voids in the lumen draft; these are eliminated using a 5-voxel dilation/erosion sequence (Figure 1(f)). At this point, the operator can verify the lumen mask and make small adjustments as required. Finally, the aorta mask is generated by adding the aortic wall draft and lumen mask (Figure 1(g)), and the final wall mask is obtained by subtracting the lumen mask from the aorta mask (Figure 1(h)).

2.3.2. Plaque and Lesion Segmentation

A Gaussian filter (; ) and a threshold of 2.0 cm-1 are applied within the lumen mask (Figure 1(i)) to segment all stained tissues inside the aortic lumen (Figure 1(j)). This plaque draft is refined using an opening (; ) and then a closing filter () (Figures 1(k) and 1(l)). Aortic lesions are defined as the regions of contact between plaques and aortic wall (Figure 1(m)). Aortic wall, plaques, and lesions are finally concatenated to form a model for three-dimensional rendering and volumetric quantification (Figure 1(n)).

2.3.3. Volumetric Quantification

Lumen and plaque volumes are quantified by direct voxel counting of the respective masks. The arterial wall inner surface is computed by triangulation of the lumen mask [13] and arterial wall thickness by a distance transform algorithm applied to the wall mask [14]. The lesion surface is calculated as 50% of the triangulated lesion mask surface (i.e., only one side of a quasi-planar object).

2.4. Histology

After microCT scanning, PTA-treated tissues were soaked for one week in 4% paraformaldehyde/7.5% sucrose fixative to remove PTA. Aortas were separated from the heart and other tissues, embedded in paraffin, and separated into single blocks of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta for sectioning and hematoxylin-eosin staining as recommended by the American Heart Association [15]. Histopathological evaluation was performed by a board-certified veterinary pathologist using the classification of Stary et al. [16].

2.5. Validations of the Semi-automatic Method
2.5.1. Validation against Manual Segmentation in MicroCT

Automatic segmentations were compared to manual contouring in 14 microCT sections with plaque (from ApoE-/- mice at 18 and 26 weeks). The corresponding grayscale and segmented slices were exported to Fiji (ImageJ) [17] and evaluated independently. The lumen, plaques, and lesions were manually identified in each slice, and the lengths and areas of these contours were measured using the integrated tools. The procedure was repeated three times for each slice, and average values were used to calculate stenosis and lesion length expressed as a percentage of the lumen area and perimeter, respectively:

2.5.2. Validation against Histological Quantification

Automatic segmentations were compared to histological quantifications in 15 slices. To achieve spatially matching images, the gross position and orientation of the histological section in a microCT volume were manually identified. Anatomical features from histological sections were searched visually in corresponding microCT scans. The landmark coordinates were used to rotate the scans rigidly and register them within the histology coordinate system. The process was repeated until the registration was deemed qualitatively satisfactory (). The histological and corresponding microCT segmented sections were exported to Fiji for evaluation of the lumen, plaques, and lesions as described above.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were implemented using R (version 3.5.2) [18]. Data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation unless stated otherwise. Correlations between manual and automatic outcomes were evaluated by fitting linear models to the data and using Bland-Altman plots to detect bias [19]. ApoE-/- and WT groups were compared with one-way ANOVA, and was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Validations
3.1.1. Validation against Manual Segmentation in MicroCT

Visual comparison of the automatic segmented plaques revealed very good correspondence with the manually contoured plaques (Figure 2(a)). In addition, automatic and manual measurements of stenosis and lesion length correlated strongly (; ) with only minor underestimation (3%) of lesion lengths in the automatic method; Bland-Altman plots showed evenly distributed errors, and all points were within two standard deviations suggesting good agreement between methods (Figure 2(c)).

3.1.2. Validation against Histological Quantification

A visual comparison of the automatic segmented plaques revealed very good correspondence with the histologic sections (Figure 2(b)). Automatic microCT measurements correlated strongly with histology lesion length (), although there was a slight (~5%) underestimation (Figure 2(c)). Bland-Altman plots also showed this underestimation, but errors were evenly distributed suggesting good agreement between methods.

3.2. Development of Atherosclerotic Lesions in ApoE-/- and WT Mice

At 13 weeks of age, there were no clinically significant plaques in both WT and ApoE-/- mice (Figure 3(a)). With age, ApoE-/- mice developed atherosclerotic plaques, principally in the aortic root, the lesser curvature of the aortic arch, and principal branches of the aorta. Based on histological characterization, ApoE-/- mice had mainly Stary type 1 plaques at 13 weeks and type 3 (with intraplaque fibro-cartilaginous tissue) and type 5 lesions at 18 and 26 weeks, respectively.

Aortic volume increased with age in ApoE-/- and WT mice with similar volumes measured at 13 and 18 weeks of age ( mm3 and  mm3), but at 26 weeks, ApoE-/- mice had significantly larger aortic volumes ( mm3) than WT mice ( mm3; ). There was a continuous increase in plaque volume ( mm3/week) and lesion surface ( mm2/week) for ApoE-/- mice between 13 and 26 weeks, which was significantly different from the lack of any notable growth in plaque volume ( mm3/week) or lesion surface ( mm2/week) in WT mice (). ApoE-/- mice had significantly more plaque volume and lesion surface at 18 and 26 weeks of age compared to WT animals () (Figure 3(b)).

4. Discussion

Contrast-enhanced microCT imaging in atherosclerotic mouse models is gaining momentum [20] and is even used as a reference for validating new modalities including micro-MRI or micro-SPECT [20, 21]. However, plaque quantification is still mostly performed manually [21, 22]. Only one semiautomatic segmentation method has been formally validated, but the technical details were not revealed [9]. We developed a 5-step workflow for quantifying atherosclerotic plaques through the entire aorta via a series of algorithms for automatic segmentation. These algorithms run natively from the scanning interface to enable efficient and reproducible evaluations. Automatic segmentation correlated highly with manual and histological evaluations on matching sections. ApoE-/- mice had continuous atherosclerotic plaque growth in volume and lesion surface from age 13 to 26 weeks; these measurements correlated well with the histopathology analysis grading. In contrast, WT mice did not develop any plaques.

The outcomes of our semiautomatic workflow concur with that expected of the ApoE-/- model, whereby detectable plaque formation occurred from age 18 weeks onwards and the progression rate is consistent with previous findings [22, 23]. We detected plaques in the predilection sites, i.e. “the aortic root, the lesser curvature of the aortic arch, and the principal branches of the aorta,” as described by Nakashima et al. [24].

In terms of the technical aspects of our procedure, our algorithms could not be directly compared to those of Lloyd et al. [9] due to their lack of methodological disclosure and reliance on an external company for the analysis. In contrast, our workflow was designed to run natively on the scanner computer system, which spares the operator from converting and transferring large amounts of data (~5 GB for a single scan and 400 GB for 84 scans). We did not formally evaluate the gain in time compared to manual analysis of up to a thousand sections for a single aorta. Nevertheless, we can speculate that the gain is above 10-fold with the automated workflow based on previous experience.

Although most processes were automatic, some technically challenging scenarios still required manual input. For example, discontinuities in the aortic wall due to arterial branches needed to be closed during initial contouring and/or postprocessing of collapsed specimens during tissue preparation was required when the lumen was very narrow, and partial volume effects seen in the wall were confounded with plaque. These interventions naturally increase the time needed for the entire process, yet eliminating these interventions via additional algorithms poses a major technical challenge given the myriad of scenarios associated with sampling and processing tissue specimens.

Manual versus automatic segmentations were performed on a limited number of single matching sections. Still, the very high correlations in single sections suggest the volume comparisons would also have been very high. We also compared only a limited number of scans with histology sections for efficiency and cost purposes. As expected with landmark-based rigid registration strategy, we did not always establish a perfectly corresponding alignment between microCT and histology sections. The registration of three- and two-dimensional images is a largely unsolved problem and is complicated by the deformation/damage encountered during tissue processing as well as the varied appearances of landmarks between modalities [25]. In this context, the correlations measured from 15 matching pairs were high enough to support the equivalence between microCT and histology.

The presented workflow was validated using the OVX ApoE-/- mouse model, in the context of a nonclinical cardiovascular safety evaluation of the sclerostin inhibitor romosozumab [26]. OVX accelerates aortic atherosclerotic lesion development due to lack of cardio-protective estrogen but not lesion distribution [27]; therefore, we assume this method is applicable to other models such as ovary-intact ApoE-/- or LDLR−/−, the low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mouse [28]. We also speculate that this workflow may be applicable to other imaging modalities with similar resolution and contrast, after adjusting the segmentation parameters. Finally, the workflow was only implemented on a Scanco microCT system, but we cannot foresee any major challenges porting the scripts to other platforms.

We were able to automatically quantify atherosclerotic plaque volume and lesion surfaces in ApoE-/- mice. The results, validated against histology and manual measurements, were consistent with the expected development of atherosclerosis in this model. The semiautomatic workflow for quantification of atherosclerotic plaques and lesions in contrast-enhanced microCT scans of mouse aortas enables researchers to perform their analysis independently. In this workflow, human input is minimized to enable better reproducibility and higher throughput. MicroCT can be used for spatial distribution and volumetric quantification of plaques and lesions in a nondestructive fashion, enabling to perform histopathology to selected sections for plaque grading, which saves a significant amount of time and effort.


ApoE-/-:Apolipoprotein E knockout
PTA:Phosphotungstic acid
ROI:Region of interest
WT:Wild type/control.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional Points

Highlights. (1) A semiautomatic image processing workflow was developed based on phosphotungstic acid- (PTA-) enhanced microCT scans for the volumetric quantification of atherosclerosis in mouse aortas. (2) Automatic measurements of plaque area and lesion length correlated strongly with manual measurements made in grayscale microCT (; ) and hematoxylin-eosin-stained slices (; ). (3) The automatic method enables monitoring and localization of atherosclerosis in mice more efficiently and without the inconvenience associated with outsourcing.


Charles Glaus is a senior scientist at Amgen and acted as the project sponsor in terms of contributing to the study design but was not involved in the interpretation of data or decision to submit for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Project design was done by VS, AV, and CG; algorithm conception and testing were done by VS remotely from Switzerland; preclinical experiments were performed by GB, JGB, MG, and AV in Montreal, Canada. Data acquisition was done by GB, VS, JGB, and MG. Data analysis was carried out by VS and GB; manuscript drafting was conducted by VS and GB. Manuscript revision was made by all authors.


Support for this research was provided by Amgen, Inc. The authors thank the necropsy, imaging, and histology teams at Charles River Laboratories and Dr. Melissa Wilhelmi at Schulthess Clinic for editing the manuscript.


  1. C. Wu, A. Daugherty, and H. S. Lu, “Updates on approaches for studying atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. e108–e117, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. on behalf of the Cardiovascular study group of the European Society of Molecular Imaging, J. Vigne, J. Thackeray et al., “Current and emerging preclinical approaches for imaging-based characterization of atherosclerosis,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 869–887, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. Paigen, A. Morrow, P. A. Holmes, D. Mitchell, and R. A. Williams, “Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic lesions in mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 231–240, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. K. Tangirala, E. M. Rubin, and W. Palinski, “Quantitation of atherosclerosis in murine models: correlation between lesions in the aortic origin and in the entire aorta, and differences in the extent of lesions between sexes in LDL receptor-deficient and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” The Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2320–2328, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. D. Boerckel, D. E. Mason, A. M. McDermott, and E. Alsberg, “Microcomputed tomography: approaches and applications in bioengineering,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 144, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. M. Jorgensen, O. Demirkaya, and E. L. Ritman, “Three-dimensional imaging of vasculature and parenchyma in intact rodent organs with X-ray micro-CT,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. H1103–H1114, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. C. Langheinrich, R. M. Bohle, S. Greschus et al., “Atherosclerotic lesions at micro CT: feasibility for analysis of coronary artery wall in autopsy specimens,” Radiology, vol. 231, no. 3, pp. 675–681, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. G. Martinez, S. I. Prajapati, C. A. Estrada et al., “Microscopic computed tomography-based virtual histology for visualization and morphometry of atherosclerosis in diabetic apolipoprotein E mutant mice,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 821-822, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. J. Lloyd, J. Helmering, S. A. Kaufman et al., “A volumetric method for quantifying atherosclerosis in mice by using microCT: comparison to en face,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 4, article e18800, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. A. Pendse, J. M. Arbones-Mainar, L. A. Johnson, M. K. Altenburg, and N. Maeda, “Apolipoprotein E knock-out and knock-in mice: atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, and beyond,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, Supplement, pp. S178–S182, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. R. Souza, E. Mendes, M. Casaro, A. T. F. B. Antiorio, F. A. Oliveira, and C. M. Ferreira, “Description of ovariectomy protocol in mice,” Definitions, vol. 1916, pp. 303–309, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. J. Gage, D. R. Kipke, and W. Shain, “Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents,” Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE, vol. 65, no. 65, pp. 1–9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline, “Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques - SIGGRAPH ‘87, pp. 163–169, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Hildebrand and P. Rüegsegger, “A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Daugherty, A. R. Tall, M. J. A. P. Daemen et al., “Recommendation on design, execution, and reporting of animal atherosclerosis studies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. e131–e157, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. C. Stary, A. B. Chandler, R. E. Dinsmore et al., “A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1355–1374, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise et al., “Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 676–682, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R Core team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018,
  19. J. Martin Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” The Lancet, vol. 327, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Isobe, S. Tsimikas, J. Zhou et al., “10.2: Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E-deficient and low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice with annexin A5,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. S77–1505, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Jung, M. Heine, M. Kaul, F. Kording, G. Adam, and H. Ittrich, Monitoring of atherosclerotic plaque progression in ApoE KO mice : - a comparison of in vivo 7T MRI and ex vivo microCT, European Society Of, 2019. View at: Publisher Site
  22. E. Faight, K. Verdelis, J. M. Ahearn, and K. J. Shields, “3D MicroCT spatial and temporal characterization of thoracic aorta perivascular adipose tissue and plaque volumes in the ApoE-/- mouse model,” Adipocytes, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 156–165, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. L. Reddick, S. H. Zhang, and N. Maeda, “Atherosclerosis in mice lacking Apo E. Evaluation of lesional development and progression,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Nakashima, A. S. Plump, E. W. Raines, J. L. Breslow, and R. Ross, “ApoE-deficient mice develop lesions of all phases of atherosclerosis throughout the arterial tree,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Khimchenko, H. Deyhle, G. Schulz et al., “Extending two-dimensional histology into the third dimension through conventional micro computed tomography,” NeuroImage, vol. 139, pp. 26–36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. R. Turk, A. M. Deaton, J. Yin et al., “Nonclinical cardiovascular safety evaluation of romosozumab, an inhibitor of sclerostin for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 115, no. May, p. 104697, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. R. Meyer, N. C. Fredette, T. A. Howard et al., “G protein-coupled estrogen receptor protects from atherosclerosis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, article 7564, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Jawien, P. Nastalek, and R. Korbut, “Mouse models of experimental atherosclerosis,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 503–517, 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Vincent A. Stadelmann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.