Research Article
Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation by Ultrasonographic Evaluation in a Northeastern Region of India
Table 4
Accuracy of the different formulas for estimating EFW by the ultrasonic method.
| ABW categories | MAE, g (Hadlock’s) | MAE, g (Shepard’s) | MAPE, % (Hadlock’s) | MAPE, % (Shepard’s) |
| ≤2500 g | N = 26 | 106.42 ± 88.11 | 65.04 ± 61.02 | 4.59 ± 3.89 | 2.80 ± 2.77 | 2501–3500 g | N = 72 | 76.39 ± 71.52 | 84.53 ± 65.85 | 2.64 ± 2.38 | 2.96 ± 2.25 | >3500 g | N = 2 | 96.00 ± 72.12 | 104.50 ± 77.07 | 2.30 ± 1.70 | 2.50 ± 1.81 | Total | N = 100 | 84.59 ± 76.54 | 79.86 ± 64.78 | 3.14 ± 2.94 | 2.91 ± 2.36 | | | value for the paired t-test = 0.54 | value for the paired t-test = 0.45 |
|
|
ABW, actual birth weight; N, total sample size; MAE, mean absolute error; MAPE, mean absolute percentage error.
|