Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 104370, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/104370
Research Article

Evaluating EML Modeling Tools for Insurance Purposes: A Case Study

Department of Product and Production, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden

Received 31 March 2010; Revised 18 October 2010; Accepted 30 November 2010

Academic Editor: Deepak Kunzru

Copyright © 2010 Mikael Gustavsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Marsh, The 100 Largest Losses 1972–2001, 20th edition, 2003.
  2. Marsh, Loss Control Newsletter, 1997.
  3. C. J. Lea and H. S. Ledin, “A review of the state of the art gas explosion modelling,” HSL/2002/02.
  4. Explosion Mechanism Advisory Group Report; Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board, Health & Safety Commission, 2007.
  5. N. R. Popat, C. A. Catlin, B. J. Arntzen et al., “Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Lundkvist and M. Gustavsson, “Estimation of maximum loss: a comparative study”.
  7. N. Gibson, Ed., Major Hazards Onshore & Offshore, Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series No. 130, Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK, 1992.
  8. CPR-14E, “Yellow Book,” 2005.
  9. C. Delvosalle, C. Fiévez, and A. Pipart, Aramis Project Deliverable D.I.C WP 1, July 2004.
  10. M. M. Stephens, “Minimizing damage to refineries from Nuclear attack, natural and other disasters,” Tech. Rep. AD-773048/4, US Department of interior Office of Oil and Gas, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. C. Van den Berg, “The multi-energy method. A framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. S. Puttock, Major Hazards Onshore & Offshore, vol. 2 of Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 139, Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1995.
  13. E. Salzano and V. Cozzani, “The analysis of domino accidents triggered by vapor cloud explosions,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 90, no. 2-3, pp. 271–284, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Schneider, “Limit states of process equipment components loaded by a blast wave,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Zirngast, ExTool Theory Manual, 2008.
  16. Broker, A Report: Private Communication.
  17. J. S. Puttock, Major Hazards Onshore & Offshore, vol. 2 of Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 139, Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1995.
  18. S. R. Hanna and R. E. Britter, Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban Sites, 2002.
  19. K. G. Kinsella, “A rapid assesment methodology for the prediction of vapour cloud explosion overpressure,” in Proceedings of the International Conference and Exhibition on Safety, Health and Loss Prevention in the Oil, Chemical and Process Industries, Singapore, 1993.
  20. J. Jiang, Z. G. Liu, and A. K. Kim, “Comparison of blast prediction models for vapor cloud explosion,” in Proceedings of the Combustion Institute/Canada Section Spring Technical Meeting, vol. 44715, pp. 23.1–23.6, NRCC, May 2001.
  21. A. C. van den Berg and N. H. A. Versloot, “The multi-energy critical separation distance,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus