Review Article
Advances in the Use of Nanocomposite Membranes for Carbon Capture Operations
Table 2
Summary of pilot and industrial scale used membrane.
| Membrane | Industry applied | Scale | CO2 purity (%) | Membrane surface area | Duration of application | No. of stages | Reference |
| Flat sheet FSC membrane | Cement plant | Pilot | 70 | 18 m2 | 6 months | 2 stages | [106] |
| Polyactive™ | Coal-fired power plant | Pilot | 60–70 | 12.5 m2 | 740 h | 1 stage | [107] |
| Polyethersulphone (PES) hollow fiber | LNG fired flue gas plant | Pilot | 90 | (2in, 3in) | | 4 stages | [76] |
| Polaris polymeric FSC membrane | Cement plant | Large | 99 | 94400 m2 41300 m2 10300 m2 | | 2-3 stages | [28] |
| Polaris membrane | Natural gas combined-cycle power plant | Pilot | 90 | 8 in diameter | 1000 h | 2 stages | [35] |
| FCE electrochemical membrane | PC flue gas power plant | Large | 90 | 11.7 m2 | 9 months | 1 stage | [34] |
| Nanoporous superhydrophobic membrane contactor | Coal-fired plant | Pilot | 93.2 2580 GPU | 3161 cm2 | | 1 stage | [42] |
| Polaris™ | Coal gas power plant | Lab Pilot Large | 95 | 30 cm2 1–4 m2 20 m2 | 2000 h | 2 stages | [33] |
| DOW nanofiltration membrane | Flue gas lignified power plant | Pilot | 764 GPU | 7.5 m2 5 m2 | 5 h 20 h | 1 stage | [90] |
|
|