International Journal of Chemical Engineering

International Journal of Chemical Engineering / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Practical and Modelling Innovations for Biomass Conversion Technologies

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9988684 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988684

Sunita S. Patil, Umesh B. Deshannavar, M. Ramasamy, Sampath Emani, Nima Khalilpoor, Alibek Issakhov, "Study of Extraction Kinetics of Total Polyphenols from Curry Leaves", International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 9988684, 8 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988684

Study of Extraction Kinetics of Total Polyphenols from Curry Leaves

Academic Editor: Alireza Baghban
Received13 Mar 2021
Accepted31 May 2021
Published09 Jun 2021

Abstract

Solid-liquid batch extraction of total polyphenol content from curry leaves (Murraya koenigii L.) was studied in this paper. The effect of different solvent concentrations and temperatures on total polyphenol content was investigated by performing batch experiments. The experimental studies showed that the kinetics of solid-liquid batch extraction was influenced by different solvent concentrations and temperatures. In solid-liquid batch extraction, more recovery of total polyphenols was obtained for 50% (v/v) aqueous methanol and at 333 K temperature. The total polyphenol obtained at optimum conditions was 79.34 mgGAE/L. Mathematical modelling is an important engineering tool used to study the kinetics of extraction as well as in the design of the extraction process to reduce time, energy, and chemical reagents. Peleg and Power law, the two mathematical models, were used to study the kinetics of the batch extraction process. The Peleg model showed the best fit to explain the kinetics of process with R2 > 0.99. Further conventional extraction methods are compared with the novel extraction method.

1. Introduction

The extraction of bioactive compounds mainly polyphenols has increased in recent years because of their medicinal value. Polyphenols are the plant secondary metabolites which constitute phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, and lignans. These are the natural antioxidants that replace synthetic antioxidants such as propyl gallate (PG), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). The consumption of food rich in polyphenols offers better protection against the development of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, and other diseases. These compounds are found in fruits, vegetables, spices, cereals, and plants with varied concentrations [14]. Herbal plants are loaded with bioactive compounds such as lipids, phytochemicals, pharmaceutics, flavours, fragrances, and pigments [5]. Curry leaves (Murraya koenigii L.), a member of the family Rutaceae, is used as a spice and easily available in India. It is mostly used in curry preparation because of its characteristic flavour and aroma [6]. Curry leaves have the properties of anti-inflammatory, antidysenteric, antioxidant, antidiabetic antimicrobial, antibacterial, positive inotropic, and cholesterol-reducing activities [7, 8].

The polyphenols present in plant materials can be extracted by solid-liquid extraction process. Solid-liquid extraction is a mass transfer phenomenon in which separation and isolation of desired bioactive compounds or group of compounds from the plant matrix take place by using a suitable solvent. The extraction is a two-stage process: the fast washing stage and the slow diffusion stage. To study the extraction process, the physical and chemical properties of solute and solvent are important and solute-solvent interactions must be known [9]. The studies have been carried out by many researchers for the solid-liquid batch extraction of polyphenols from different raw materials under different extraction conditions such as solvent composition, particle size, solid-to-solvent ratio, time, and temperature [2, 1013]. The kinetics of the extraction process is well predicted using suitable models [14]. Mathematical modelling is an important engineering tool which is used to facilitate simulation, optimisation, design, and control of processes [2]. By applying the experimental data to model equations, the parameters like mass transfer coefficients in washing and diffusion steps as well as diffusivity can be determined. Fick’s law of diffusion [1517], first- and second-order kinetic modelling [4, 18, 19], Peleg model [2, 13, 20], Power law model [21], and two-site kinetic model [14, 19, 22] are used in the extraction study of polyphenols and other bioactive compounds from plant matrix using conventional and advanced extraction methods.

The present paper focuses on the study of the effect of solvent concentration and temperature on the recovery of total polyphenols from curry leaves by solid-liquid batch extraction. Literature data on mathematical modelling of total polyphenols from the curry leaves are scarce. To have insights into the mathematical modelling, an attempt has been made to study the extraction kinetics by the application of Peleg model and Power law model to the obtained experimental data. The conventional extraction methods are compared with the novel method in terms of percentage recovery of polyphenols.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The curry leaves (Murraya koenigii L.) were collected from local market. In laboratory, the leaves were separated from stem and washed with water and finally with distilled water to remove dust and impurities. Sejali and Anur [23] found that the medicinal quality of plant parts was affected due to thermal degradation of active constituents and investigated the effect of drying process on phenolic compounds present in neem leaves powder. They observed that phenolic contents were higher in shade drying powder than oven drying at 45°C and at 70°C. So, the cleaned curry leaves were shade dried at ∼ 30–35°C for 10 days. Periodically, the weight was checked to ensure complete removal of moisture. Cleaned and dried samples were ground using a grinder machine (Jaipan). Ground samples were sieved and separated, and 36-mesh (0.425 mm) particle size material was used for further experimentation. The sample was stored in airtight containers at 4°C to avoid the direct contact with air.

2.2. Chemicals

Gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, methanol, and anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) of Merck were used in the study.

3. Methods

3.1. Soxhlet Extraction

The thimble containing 10 g of 0.425 mm of plant material packed in a white muslin cloth was placed between condenser and round-bottom flask containing 400 mL of 50% (v/v) methanol-water solvent [24]. After boiling the solvent, the extraction chamber progressively furnishes with new solvent from the round bottom flask. When meeting the maximum level in the extraction chamber, the condensed solvent from the extraction chamber was flushed back into the round bottom flask by a siphon. This condensed solvent carries the solutes into the solvent. The extraction was performed for 7 h and sample was analysed for the total polyphenol content. The result obtained from the Soxhlet method is considered as maximum value of polyphenol concentration and the rest of the experimental values from batch and ultrasound-assisted extraction were compared with this.

3.2. Batch Extraction

The solid-liquid batch extraction was performed in a glass reactor of 300 mL capacity equipped with a three-blade marine propeller of diameter 4 cm to provide the stirring. The stirring helps in avoiding the settling of the solid particles due to gravity. The experiments were performed to study the effect of methanol-water solvent compositions (0%, 50%, and 100% v/v) and temperatures (313, 323, and 333 K) for the particle size of 0.425 mm and solid-to-solvent ratio of 1 : 40 (g/mL). The batch extraction was performed for 7 h. The samples were withdrawn at fixed intervals and filtered with Whatman No. 42 filter paper prior to analysis.

3.3. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was performed by using ultrasound probe DP 120 model supplied by PCI Analytics, Mumbai, of 20 kHz frequency and 250 W power. The probe was operated in pulse mode (10 s on-off) to avoid heat dissipation and loss of solvent due to heat [25]. The other experimental conditions were kept similar as in batch extraction. The mixture was sonicated for 1 h using 50% (v/v) methanol-water solvent concentration and samples were withdrawn at fixed time interval, filtered, and analysed.

3.4. Determination of Total Polyphenol Content (TPC) by Folin–Ciocalteu Method

TPC was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method [26]. For all analysis, 1.0 mL of sample was added to at least 60 mL of distilled water in a 100 mL volumetric flask. 5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added to the flask and mixed. After 1 min and before 8 min, 15 mL of 20% sodium carbonate solution was added and the volume was adjusted to 100 mL with distilled water. The samples were kept in water bath at 40°C for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm wavelength in a 3 mL cuvette using UV double beam spectrophotometer (Model: Shimadzu UV1800, Japan). A calibration curve was prepared from gallic acid standard solutions (50, 100, 150, 200, 500, and 1000 mg/L) (R2 = 0.996) and the blank was prepared with distilled water. The total polyphenol content was expressed as mgGAE/L.

3.5. Mathematical Models

The kinetics of total polyphenols extraction by batch process was studied by fitting the obtained experimental data to Peleg and Power law model equations.

3.6. Power Law Model

The Power law model is one of the empirical equations used in kinetic study of solid-liquid extraction. The model has been used in kinetic study of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana [21] and vanillin from Vanilla planifolia Andrews [27] by microwave-assisted extraction.

The equation for Power law model iswhere Ct is a concentration of total polyphenols in extraction solvent (mgGAE/L) at time t (s), n is Power law exponent (<1), and B is constant related to extraction rate (L/g s).

3.7. Peleg Model

Peleg proposed a nonexponential empirical equation in 1988 for sorption curves, i.e., moisture versus time [28]. Because of the similarity between the sorption curves and concentration curves, Peleg model can also be used to explain the kinetics of solid-liquid extraction [2]. The model has been used to explain the kinetics of solid-liquid extraction of polyphenols from soybeans [13] and grape seeds [2]. The equation for Peleg model iswhere C(t) is the concentration of total polyphenols at time t (mgGAE/L), Co is the concentration of total polyphenols (mgGAE/L) at time t = 0, K1 = Peleg’s rate constant that relates the initial extraction rate (min.g/mg), and K2 = Peleg’s capacity constant that relates the maximum extraction yield (g/mg). In the solvent, the initial concentration of polyphenols is zero; hence, the term Co can be excluded from equation (2). Therefore, equation (2) is modified as

3.8. Statistical Analysis

The consistency between the predicted and the experimental data was examined using the coefficient of correlation (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE), which are defined aswhere n is the number of samples, xi is the experimental value of the ith sample, is the predicted value of the ith sample, and is the mean value of all experimental data, with a high R2 value and low RMSE value indicating high consistency between the experimental and predicted data.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Effect of Solvent Concentration on TPC

The selection of an appropriate solvent or solvent mixture is an important step in extraction of polyphenols from the plant matrix. The polyphenols mainly consist of phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, and lignans and have a complex structure. Hence, it is difficult to predict the solute-solvent interactions. The choice of a solvent depends on polarity, the solubility of solute in the given solvent, reactivity, safety, and cost. The polar compounds are soluble in polar solvents such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and acetone, whereas nonpolar compounds are soluble in nonpolar solvents such as toluene, benzene, hexane, and cyclohexane. It was found that the mixtures of alcohol and water work best in extracting phenolic compounds compared to the monocomponent solvent [29]. The effect of methanol-water solvent compositions (0%, 50%, and 100% v/v) on extraction of total polyphenols by batch extraction for particle size of 0.425 mm and solid-to-solvent ratio of 1 : 40 (g/mL) and at room temperature (27°C) was studied. It was observed from Figure 1 that maximum amount of total polyphenol content of 75.42 mgGAE/L was obtained for 50% (v/v) methanol-water composition, while less concentration of total polyphenols was obtained for absolute water and absolute methanol solvents. For all solvent compositions, it was seen that initially the rate of extraction of polyphenols was higher and afterwards it remains constant approaching towards equilibrium. The concentrations obtained at 7 h were considered as equilibrium concentrations attained during extraction. The probable reason for obtaining the higher amount of polyphenols in 50% (v/v) methanol-water composition is that the addition of small amount of water to methanol increases the polarity of the medium and breaking of hydrogen bonding, thus facilitating the extraction [30]. The polarity index of 50% (v/v) methanol-water mixture is 7.05 which is higher than methanol. Also, the addition of water increases the swelling of the plant material which in turn enhances the contact surface area for solvent-solid. Increasing the concentration of methanol in solvent mixture causes protein denaturation and prevents the dissolution of polyphenols in the solvent and hence affects the extraction rate [31]. Our findings are in accordance with Jovanovic et al. [32]. They reported a maximum yield of total polyphenol of 19.6 mgGAE/L by maceration, 22.6 mgGAE/L by heat-assisted extraction, and 24.9 mgGAE/L by UAE from Thymus serpyllum leaves at 50% ethanol-water concentrations. Costa et al. [33] found 50% ethanol-water as the best solvent for the extraction of polyphenols from Thymus lotocephalus. Jokic et al. [13] also found 50% ethanol-water as the best solvent for extraction of polyphenols from soybeans by solid-liquid batch extraction. It was found from the literature that 40–60% (v/v/) alcohol-water (ethanol or methanol) works best to get the higher yield of polyphenols from the plant material. It was also reported that extraction of polyphenols from curry leaves was carried out by using water, ethanol, ethanol-water (1 : 1), hexane, and chloroform as the solvents [6] and obtained a highest yield of 168 mgGAE/g of extract from 1 : 1 ethanol-water mixture. The specific difference in results exists due to methodologies followed, experimental work, variety, and location of plant material.

4.2. Effect of Temperature on TPC

The temperature is an important factor influencing the extraction of polyphenols from the different plant matrices. With increasing temperature, the solubility and diffusivity of phenolic compounds increase and enhance the extraction of polyphenols. Also increasing the temperature reduces the surface tension and viscosity of the extraction medium, thus accelerating the mass transfer rate and hence extraction of polyphenols [4]. The batch extraction was performed at 313, 323, and 333 K for particle size of 0.425 mm, solid-to-liquid ratio 1 : 40 (g/mL), and methanol-water composition 50% (v/v). Figure 2 shows the positive influence of temperature on the concentration of polyphenols. The extraction of polyphenols has increased from 313 to 333 K. This increase in the concentration of TPC might be due to increased diffusivity of polyphenols into solvent. The maximum amount of polyphenols obtained at 333 K was 79.34 mgGAE/L. The rate of extraction was fast in the initial 1.5 hours, i.e., washing stage, and thereafter, it was slow in the diffusion stage. However, a too high temperature may cause loss of solvent by evaporation and thermal degradation of polyphenols may affect the efficiency of extraction [34]. Ghitescu et al. [35] observed similar results for the temperatures of 313–333 K for extraction of polyphenols from spruce wood bark by UAE. Wang et al. [36] also achieved similar results of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat bran by increasing temperature from 298 K to 348 K.

4.3. Comparison of Kinetic Models

The experimental data obtained by performing batch extraction were analysed by using two kinetic models: the Peleg model and the Power law model. The mathematical modelling of the process helps to understand the complex diffusion and mass transfer phenomena. Evaluation of best fit among the models was done based on the value of correlation coefficient (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE).

4.4. Peleg Model

The graph of 1/Ct versus 1/t yields the values of Peleg model constants K1 and K2. The lower values of K1 and K2 imply the faster rate of extraction and the maximum concentration at equilibrium, respectively. The calculated Peleg’s model constants K1 and K2, experimental and predicted equilibrium concentrations, and values of R2 and RMSE are shown in Table 1. The values of R2 are in the range of 0.997–0.998 and RMSE are in the range of 0.343–1.267 (Table 1). The higher values of correlation coefficients and lower values of RMSE signify that the model fits the experimental data well compared to the Power law model. With higher values of R2, Figure 3 shows good correlation between all experimental and predicted values of total polyphenol concentration for Peleg model at different temperatures and methanol-water solvent compositions.


ParameterK1 (g min/mg)K2 (g/mg)Experimental Ce (mgGAE/L)Predicted Ce (mgGAE/L)R2RMSE

Temperature (K)
3130.00460.015662.6261.510.9971.031
3230.00410.014070.3468.560.9980.827
3330.00470.012479.3476.410.9971.267

Methanol-water conc. (%v/v)
00.01120.015159.7859.880.9980.686
500.01560.010875.4276.500.9980.954
1000.00060.016258.8758.620.9970.343

4.5. Power Law Model

In this model, a plot of ln Ct versus ln t yields the values of Power law constants n and B. The values of the Power law model constants, R2, and RMSE are shown in Table 2. The values of R2 are in the range of 0.954–0.991, while RMSE are in the range of 0.543–4.0 (Table 2). Figure 4 shows experimental and predicted concentration values of total polyphenols for Power law model at different temperatures and methanol-water solvent compositions.


ParameterB (L/g s)n (g/mg)Experimental Ce (mgGAE/L)Predicted Ce (mgGAE/L)R2RMSE

Temperature (K)
31331.140.11662.6263.010.9780.613
32335.670.11270.3570.250.9660.770
33333.360.14279.3478.850.9910.543

Methanol-water conc. (%v/v)
015.300.23259.7862.110.9611.481
509.2520.35775.4270.250.9544.00
10026.680.13458.8759.970.9590.865

4.6. Comparison of Extraction Methods

UAE is a novel, clean, and green extraction method. UAE requires less time, solvent, and energy compared to conventional extraction methods. The Soxhlet extraction and batch extraction methods were compared with the UAE method. The comparison of methods in terms of percent extraction of total polyphenol content is shown in Figure 5. In all three methods, a particle size of 0.425 mm, solid-to-solvent ratio of 1 : 40 g/mL, and solvent concentration of 50% (v/v) methanol-water were maintained. Soxhlet extraction that was performed for 7 h results in total polyphenols concentration of 100.66 mgGAE/L and was considered as 100% extraction and the remaining values were compared with this base value [25]. The percentage extraction obtained by batch extraction for 7 h was 74.92% whereas percentage extraction by ultrasound assistance was 65.68% in 1 h of duration. Though higher recovery of polyphenols was obtained in Soxhlet extraction, it requires more time and energy. UAE results in better recovery of polyphenols than the conventional methods. Since in UAE due to acoustic cavitation, the rupture of plant cells occurs, facilitating the diffusion of solute into the solvent and thus enhancing the efficiency.

5. Conclusion

The kinetics of solid-liquid batch extraction of total polyphenols from curry leaves was investigated. The results showed that the temperature and solvent concentration have a great impact on extraction efficiency. The optimal batch extraction conditions found are temperature of 333 K and methanol-water concentration of 50% (v/v). Under these optimal conditions, the maximum concentration of total polyphenol content of 79.34 mgGAE/L was obtained. Mathematical modelling study showed that Peleg model fits the experimental data well. The positive correlation was found between all experimental and predicted values of total polyphenol concentration. The comparison of conventional Soxhlet and batch extraction methods with novel UAE method showed that less time and energy were required for UAE to get higher recovery of polyphenols than conventional methods.

Abbreviations

TPC:Total polyphenol content
GAE/L:Gallic acid equivalent/litre
UAE:Ultrasound-assisted extraction
RMSE:Root mean squared error
C(t):Concentration of total polyphenols at time t
Ce:Equilibrium concentration
CS:Concentration of total polyphenols at saturation
k:Rate constant of extraction
K1:Peleg’s rate constant
K2:Peleg’s capacity constant
n, B:Model fitting parameters (Power law model)
t:Time
R2:Coefficient of correlation.

Data Availability

The results reported in the article are available from the corresponding author to other researchers upon request. Codes cannot be shared with other researchers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. C. D. Stalikas, “Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 3268–3295, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Bucić-Kojić, M. Planinić, S. Tomas, M. Bilić, and D. Velić, “Study of solid–liquid extraction kinetics of total polyphenols from grape seeds,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 236–242, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. B. Pandey and S. I. Rizvi, “Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 270–278, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Lazar, A. I. Talmaciu, I. Volf, and V. I. Popa, “Kinetic modeling of the ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Picea abies bark,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 32, pp. 191–197, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Wang and C. L. Weller, “Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 300–312, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. B. Ningappa, R. Dinesha, and L. Srinivas, “Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of polyphenol-enriched curry leaf (Murraya koenigii L.) extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 720–728, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Sasidharan and A. N. Menon, “Effects of temperature and solvent on antioxidant properties of curry leaf (Murraya koenigii L.),” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 366–370, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Jain, M. Momin, and K. Laddha, “Murraya koenigii: an updated review,” International Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine, vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 607–627, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Rostagno and J. M. Prado, Natural Product Extraction: Principles and Applications, The Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, London, UK, 2013.
  10. Š.S. Herodež, M. Hadolin, M. Škerget, and Ž. Knez, “Solvent extraction study of antioxidants from Balm (Melissa officinalis L.) leaves,” Food Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 275–282, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. E. Cacace and G. Mazza, “Mass transfer process during extraction of phenolic compounds from milled berries,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 379–389, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Pinelo, J. Sineiro, and M. J. Núñez, “Mass transfer during continuous solid-liquid extraction of antioxidants from grape byproducts,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Jokić, D. Velić, M. Bilić, A. Bucić-Kojić, M. Planinić, and S. Tomas, “Modelling of solid-liquid extraction process of total polyphenols from soybeans,” Czech Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 206–212, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. L. Baiao Dias, C. S. Arroio Sergio, P. Santos, G. F. Barbero, C. A. Rezende, and J. Martinez, “Ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from dedo de moca pepper (Capsicum baccatum L.): effects on the vegetable matrix and mathematical modeling,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 198, p. 36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Wongkittipong, L. Prat, S. Damronglerd, and C. Gourdon, “Solid-liquid extraction of andrographolide from plants-experimental study, kinetic reaction and model,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. D. Espinoza-Pérez, A. Vargas, V. J. Robles-Olvera, G. C. Rodrı´guez-Jimenes, and M. A. Garcı´a-Alvarado, “Mathematical modeling of caffeine kinetic during solid-liquid extraction of coffee beans,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. G. Gujar, S. J. Wagh, and V. G. Gaikar, “Experimental and modeling studies on microwave-assisted extraction of thymol from seeds of Trachyspermum ammi (TA),” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 257–264, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. M. Poojary and P. Passamonti, “Extraction of lycopene from tomato processing waste: kinetics and modelling,” Food Chemistry, vol. 173, pp. 943–950, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. M. Patil and K. G. Akamanchi, “Ultrasound-assisted rapid extraction and kinetic modelling of influential factors: extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 37, pp. 582–591, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. J. Tušek, M. Benković, A. B. Cvitanović, D. Valinger, T. Jurina, and J. G. Kljusurić, “Kinetics and thermodynamics of the solid-liquid extraction process of total polyphenols, antioxidants and extraction yield from Asteraceae plants,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 91, pp. 205–214, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. M. Patil and K. G. Akamanchi, “Microwave assisted process intensification and kinetic modelling: extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 98, pp. 60–67, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. S. Duba, A. A. Casazza, H. B. Mohamed, P. Perego, and L. Fiori, “Extraction of polyphenols from grape skins and defatted grape seeds using subcritical water: experiments and modeling,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 94, pp. 29–38, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. N. F. Sejali and M. S. Anuar, “Effect of drying methods on phenolic contents of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder,” Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. G. Gujar, S. Chattopadhyay, S. J. Wagh, and V. G. Gaikar, “Experimental and modeling studies on extraction of catechin hydrate and epicatechin from Indian green tea leaves,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 232–240, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. S. Patil, A. Pathak, and V. K. Rathod, “Optimization and kinetic study of ultrasound assisted deep eutectic solvent based extraction: a greener route for extraction of curcuminoids from Curcuma longa,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 70, Article ID 105267, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. V. L. Singleton, R. Orthofer, and R. M. Lamuela-Raventós, “Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent,” Oxidants and Antioxidants Part A, vol. 299, pp. 152–178, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. Dong, F. Gu, F. Xu, and Q. Wang, “Comparison of four kinds of extraction techniques and kinetics of microwave-assisted extraction of vanillin from Vanilla planifolia Andrews,” Food Chemistry, vol. 149, pp. 54–61, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Peleg, “An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1216-1217, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Belwal, P. Dhyani, I. D. Bhatt, R. S. Rawal, and V. Pande, “Optimization extraction conditions for improving phenolic content and antioxidant activity in Berberis asiatica fruits using response surface methodology (RSM),” Food Chemistry, vol. 207, pp. 115–124, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Bouras, M. Chadni, F. J. Barba, N. Grimi, O. Bals, and E. Vorobiev, “Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Quercus bark,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 77, pp. 590–601, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Dahmoune, B. Nayak, K. Moussi, H. Remini, and K. Madani, “Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Myrtus communis L. leaves,” Food Chemistry, vol. 166, pp. 585–595, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. A. Jovanović, V. B. Đorđević, G. M. Zdunić et al., “Optimization of the extraction process of polyphenols from Thymus serpyllum L. herb using maceration, heat-and ultrasound-assisted techniques,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 179, pp. 369–380, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Costa, S. Gonçalves, P. Valentão, P. B. Andrade, N. Coelho, and A. Romano, “Thymus lotocephalus wild plants and in vitro cultures produce different profiles of phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 1253–1260, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. M. Goula, “Ultrasound-assisted extraction of pomegranate seed oil - kinetic modeling,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 492–498, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R.-E. Ghitescu, I. Volf, C. Carausu, A.-M. Bühlmann, I. A. Gilca, and V. I. Popa, “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Spruce wood bark,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 22, pp. 535–541, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Wang, B. Sun, Y. Cao, Y. Tian, and X. Li, “Optimisation of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat bran,” Food Chemistry, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 804–810, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Sunita S. Patil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1086
Downloads777
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.