Research Article

Screening of Pure ILs and DESs for CO2 Separation, N2O Separation, and H2S Separation Processes

Table 3

The optimal condition (Ts, Pa), the absorbents amounts (mabs), and the energy consumption (Qtot) of the screened absorbents.

AbsorbentsCO2 streamsTs (K)Pa (bar)mabs (g∙gX−1)Qtot (GJ∙tonX−1)

[Bmim][DCA]Effluent gases299.15–323.1522.21–178.58188.41–12.371.95–3.16
Kiln gas299.15–323.1512.33–94.60150.01–10.630.99–1.68
Biomass syngas299.15–323.1510.88–97.35137.70–7.800.85–1.39
Biogas [11]299.15–323.158.75–64.34124.21–8.640.73–1.04

[Eeim][Ac]Effluent gases303.15–345.1529.43–137.9642.31–8.102.48–3.70
Kiln gas299.15–345.157.81–74.44141.14–7.331.18–2.27
Biomass syngas300.15–345.158.46–123.3767.36–5.011.10–1.92
Biogas [11]299.15–345.154.30–59.99108.11–6.930.84–1.82

[Omim][PF6]High-sulfur natural gas299.15–323.153.97–14.74290.77–14.721.05–1.44

[P66614][FAP]Adipic acid off-gas299.15–323.156.40–22.71107.13–6.420.65–0.95

[Omim][BF4]Synthetic ammonia purge [13]299.15–319.153.31–11.0620.12–257.051.05–1.91