Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 513461, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/513461
Research Article

Rank Protein Immunolabeling during Bone-Implant Interface Healing Process

1Department of Surgery and General Clinical, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio 1190, Bloco 10A, Vila Mendonça, 16015-050 Araçatuba, Brazil
2Department of Dental Materials and Prothesis, São José dos Campos Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Brazil

Received 24 March 2010; Revised 18 June 2010; Accepted 18 June 2010

Academic Editor: A. B. M. Rabie

Copyright © 2010 Francisley Ávila Souza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. W. Higuchi, “Ortho-integration: the alliance between orthodontics and osseointegration,” in Orthodontic Application of Osseointegrated Implants 2000, K. W. Higuchi, Ed., pp. 1–20, Quintessence, Hong Kong, China, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. I. Bränemark, G. A. Zarb, and T . Albrektsson, Tissue Integrated Protheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, Quitenssence, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1985.
  3. J. Hollinger and M. E. K. Wong, “The integrated processes of hard tissue regeneration with special emphasis on fracture healing,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 594–606, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Ferguson, E. Alpern, T. Miclau, and J. A. Helms, “Does adult fracture repair recapitulate embryonic skeletal formation?” Mechanisms of Development, vol. 87, no. 1-2, pp. 57–66, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. E. Davies, Bone Engineering, Squared, Toronto, Canada, 2000.
  6. J. E. Davies, “Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 932–949, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. E. Roberts and L. P. Garetto, “Bone PHysiology and metabolism,” in Contemporary Implant Dentistry, C. E. Misch, Ed., pp. 225–237, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. S. P. Carvalho, S. B. Jaef, and M. G. Sanches, “Histological study in dogs of small diameter implants system TF,” JBC—Jornal Brasileiro de Clínica Odontológica Integrada, vol. 1, pp. 21–24, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. S. Faeda, H. S. Tavares, R. Sartori, A. C. Guastaldi, and E. Marcantonio Jr., “Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1706–1715, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Carlsson, T. Röstlund, B. Albrektsson, and T. Albrektsson, “Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. R. Klokkevold, R. D. Nishimura, M. Adachi, and A. Caputo, “Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface: a torque removal study in the rabbit,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 442–447, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Meirelles, F. Currie, M. Jacobsson, T. Albrektsson, and A. Wennerberg, “The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 641–647, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. L. Ma, R. L. Cain, D. L. Halladay et al., “Catabolic effects of continuous human PTH (1-38) in vivo is associated with sustained stimulation of RANKL and inhibition of osteoprotegerin and gene-associated bone formation,” Endocrinology, vol. 142, no. 9, pp. 4047–4054, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Khosla, “Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system,” Endocrinology, vol. 142, no. 12, pp. 5050–5055, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Stejskal, J. Bartek, R. Pastorková, V. Růzicka, I. Oral, and D. Horalík, “Osteoprotegerin, RANK, RANKL,” Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 61–64, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Suda, N. Takahashi, N. Udagawa, E. Jimi, M. T. Gillespie, and T. J. Martin, “Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 345–357, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Kaneda, T. Nojima, M. Nakagawa et al., “Endogenous production of TGF-β is essential for osteoclastogenesis induced by a combination of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 8, pp. 4254–4263, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Takahashi, N. Udagawa, and T. Suda, “A new member of tumor necrosis factor ligand family, ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL, regulates osteoclast differentiation and function,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 256, no. 3, pp. 449–455, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. National Research Council, “Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals,” DHHS Publication (NIH) 85–23, Department of Health and Human Services, NRC, Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Devlin, J. Hoyland, J. F. Newall, and S. Ayad, “Trabecular bone formation in the healing of the rodent molar tooth extraction socket,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2061–2067, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. B. Walter and I. C. Talbot, “Wound healing,” in Walter & Israel General Pathology 1996, pp. 65–180, Churchill Levingstone, New York, NY, USA, 7th edition, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. E. Davies, “Mechanisms of endosseous integration,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 391–401, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. S. P. Carvalho and D. Ponzoni, “Biological aspects of osseointegration,” in Dental Implants: Thechnique and Art 2002, L. A. Gomes, Ed., pp. 1–9, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. B. Brunski, “Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 775–787, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Watzak, W. Zechner, C. Ulm, S. Tangl, G. Tepper, and G. Watzek, “Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 408–416, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. Zechner, M. Kneissel, S. Kim, C. Ulm, G. Watzek, and H. Plenk Jr., “Histomorphometrical and clinical comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in dogs,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Zechner, S. Tangl, G. Fürst et al., “Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. B. Novaes Jr., S. L. S. Souza, P. T. de Oliveira, and A. M. M. S. Souza, “Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 377–383, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. L. Cochran, “A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1523–1539, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Hsu, D. L. Lacey, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 3540–3545, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Li, I. Sarosi, X.-Q. Yan et al., “RANK is the intrinsic hematopoietic cell surface receptor that controls osteoclastogenesis and regulation of bone mass and calcium metabolism,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1566–1571, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. R. Pettit, N. C. Walsh, C. Manning, S. R. Goldring, and E. M. Gravallese, “RANKL protein is expressed at the pannus-bone interface at sites of articular bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1068–1076, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus