Research Article
Tooth Decay in Alcohol Abusers Compared to Alcohol and Drug Abusers
Table 3
Factors associated with decayed teeth and filled teeth (bivariate analyses at 10% level of significance and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
| Bivariate analyses | OR | 95% CI | |
| Decayed teeth (0 versus >0): | | | | White versus other | 2.38 | 1.22–4.64 | .01 | “Alcohol and drugs” abuse versus “alcohol only” | 1.34 | 0.98–1.82 | .07 | Units of alcohol per week | 1.001 | 1.000–1.003 | .04 | Filled teeth (0–8 versus >8): | | | | Male | 0.63 | 0.44–0.91 | .013 | Higher social class | 2.16 | 1.57–2.98 | <.001 | Beer drinking versus no beer drinking | 0.69 | 0.49–0.97 | .031 | Wine drinking versus no wine drinking | 2.11 | 1.34–3.33 | <.001 | Multivariate analyses | | | | Decayed teeth (0 versus >0): | | | | White versus other | 2.26 | 1.15–4.45 | .018 | “Alcohol and drugs” abuse versus “alcohol Only” | 1.38 | 1.01–1.89 | .049 | Filled teeth (0–8 versus >8): | | | | Male | 1.30 | 0.89–1.91 | .18 | Higher social class | 1.98 | 1.43–2.75 | <.001 | Beer drinking versus no beer drinking | 0.83 | 0.58–1.19 | .31 | Wine drinking versus no wine drinking | 1.85 | 1.16–2.96 | <.05 |
|
|
Decayed teeth cut-off median of 0 versus >0 and filled teeth cut-off median of 8 versus > 8.
|