In Vitro Repair of Fractured Fiber-Reinforced Cusp-Replacing Composite Restorations

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="2">Group</td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center"></td><td align="center" colspan="2">95% CI for mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center"><span style="width: 14.8375px;"><svg height="10.325" id="M10" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 14.8375 10.325" width="14.8375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,10.325)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.74)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.79)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑁</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg></span></td><td align="center">Mean</td><td align="center">SD</td><td align="center">Lower bound</td><td align="center">Upper bound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">(A) Woven FRC basing</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1261</td><td align="center">228</td><td align="center">1017</td><td align="center">1505</td></tr><tr><td align="left">(B) Unidirectional FRC basing</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1127</td><td align="center">242</td><td align="center">920</td><td align="center">1335</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td>
              *Data original restorations: woven FRC basing 2202 (SD 200 N), unidirectional FRC basing 2426 (SD 333 N). <br/>CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.<br/></td></tr></table>

Fracture loads of repaired specimens in newton.*

International Journal of Dentistry

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: In Vitro Repair of Fractured Fiber-Reinforced Cusp-Replacing Composite Restorations 