Review Article

Relevance of Variations in the Opposing Dentition for the Functionality of Fixed and Removable Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Studies evaluated—summary.

StudyIndicationInterventionComparative intervention Opposing dentitionObservationaSetting (outpatient)

Randomized controlled trials

Budtz-Jørgensen and Isidor, 1990 [12]Partially edentulous mandibleFixed partial dentureRemovable partial dentureCD1980-1981b  
1981–1986c
Aarhus, Denmark

Prospective interventional studies

Balshi et al., 1996 [13]Single-tooth gap in the molar area Implant-supported crown 
Implant-supported bridge
dNDn/aFort Washington, Pennsylvania, USA
Carlson and Yontchev, 1996 [14]Residual dentition of mandibular caninesFixed partial dentureCD1973–1975bGothenburg, Sweden
Esquivel-Upshaw et al., 2008 [15]Single-tooth gaps in posterior teethFixed partial dentureNDn/aFlorida, USA
Romeo et al., 2003 [16]Partially edentulous patientsImplant-supported bridgeND/CD/FPD/RPD1994–2001Milan, Italy
Ueda et al., 1993 [17]Partially edentulous and edentulous patientsImplant-supported bridge Implant-supported complete denture ND/RPD/IFPn/aNagoya, Japan
Wayler et al., 1984 [18]Dentures and
Intact dentition
Partial dentureComplete dentures and intact dentitionND/CD/RPDn/aBoston, USA

Retrospective interventional studies

Randow et al., 1986 [19]Partially edentulousFixed partial dentureND/CD/FPD/RPD1974–1976b  
1981–1983c
Malmö, Sweden
Studer et al., 1998 [20]Partially edentulous patientsFixed-removable reconstructionND/CD/FPD/RPD1976–1993bZurich, Switzerland
Yli-Urpo et al.,1985[21]Removable dentures in need of repairRemovable partial dentureRemovable partial dentureND/CD/RPD1978–1983b  
1983-1984e
Kuopio, Finland

Cross-sectional studies/questionnairesf

Frank et al.,1998 [22]Mandibular partial denturesPartial dentureND/CD/FPD/RPD1990–1995bSeattle, Washington, USA
Hummel et al., 2002 [23]Partial denturesPartial dentureND/CD/FPD/RPD1988–1994Overall pop., USA
Lassila et al., 1985 [24]Partial and complete denturesPartial dentureComplete dentureND/CD/RPDn/aTurku, Finland
Liedberg et al., 2005 [25](Complete) dentures, intact dentition Partial dentureComplete denture and intact dentitionND/CD/RPD1985–1987Malmö, Sweden
Ow et al., 1997 [26]Dentures, intact dentitionPartial dentureComplete denture and intact dentitionNDn/aSingapore
Tuominen et al., 1989 [27]Partial dentures, intact dentitionPartial dentureIntact dentitionND/FPD/RPDn/aOverall pop., Finland
Vallittu et al., 1993 [28]Removable dentures in need of repairRemovable partial dentureRemovable partial dentureND/CD/FPD/RPDn/aLathi/Kuopio, Finland

a The exact periods of observation, which may differ from the period the study was conducted, are listed separately in the summary tables.
bManufacture of prostheses.
cFollowup.
dIf not specified, there is no comparative intervention or no intervention evaluated.
eRepair of prostheses.
fNoninterventional inquiries by questionnaire.
CD: complete denture, FPD: fixed partial denture, IFP: implant-supported fixed prostheses, ND: natural dentition, RPD: removable partial denture, n/a: not available.