Research Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Static Frictional Resistance Using Various Methods of Ligation at Different Time Intervals: An In Vitro Study

Table 4

Comparison of mean static friction found in other studies quoted and results obtained in the present study. A comparative evaluation of static frictional resistance.

AuthorType of bracket-wire used in the study and method of ligature placementType of ligationDry or wet medium Mean static friction

Stannard et al. [7], 1986Stainless steel or Teflon coated brackets with 0.017 × 0.025′′ SS, TMA, NiTi, and Co-Cr wires 
Placement of ligature not mentioned
Stainless Steel ligaturesBoth Dry
739 g SS
Wet
855 g SS

Baker et al. [5], 1987 PAE SS Brackets with 0.018′′, 0.020′′, and 0.018 × 0.025′′ SS wires Placement of ligature not mentioned0.010′′ polyurethane ligaturesBoth 142 g in saliva 
170 g in dry 
166 g in glycerine

Dowling et al., 1998Standard twin and mini twin brackets with 0.018 × 0.025′′ wire Placement of ligature with an Orthopli 018R forceps Elastomeric modules round A-grey, B-clear,   C-orange, D-fluoride impregnated, rectangular E-greyBoth Dry
A-1.05 N 
B-1.06 N 
C-0.91 N 
D-1.16 N 
E-1.46 N
Wet
A-1.25 N 
B-0.80 N 
C-1.22 N 
D-1.07 N 
E- 1.15 N

Khambay et al. [9],   2005Self-ligating Damon II and PAE SS brackets with 0.017 × 0.025 SS and TMA and 0.019 × 0.025′′ SS and TMA 
Placement of ligature with straight shooter gun
Elastomeric modules-, purple, grey, Alastik or Super Slick, and 0.09′′ SS ligatureWet 0.019 × 0.025′′  bracket
SS ligature-0.45 N 
Alastik-0.50  N 
Purple-0.56 N 
Grey-0.84 N 
Super Slick-0.98 N

Chimenti et al. [10], 20050.022′′ PAE SS brackets with 0.019 × 0.025′′ SS wire Placement of ligature not mentionedElastic modules (small, medium, large, clear lubricated, and grey lubricated) Dry Small modules: 533.16 g 
Medium modules: 508.80 g 
Large modules: 611.14 g 
Clear lubricated: 392.44 g 
Gray lubricated: 350.38 g

Hain et al. [11], 2006Victory, speed, and Damon II brackets with 0.019 × 0.025′′ SS wire  
Placement of ligature not mentioned
Regular uncoated,  
Super Slick,  
conventional silver, Alastik,  
Sili-Ties
Wet Regular uncoated: 2 N 
Super Slick: 0.96 N 
Conventional silver: 2.80 N 
Alastik: 1.87 N 
Sili-Ties: 1.81 N

Gandini et al. [12], 2008SmartClip and conventional SS bracket with 0.014′′ NiTi and 0.019 × 0.025′′ SS wire 
Placement of ligature not mentioned
Conventional elastomeric ligature (CEL) and unconventional elastomeric ligature (UEL)Dry0.019 × 0.025′′  SS
CEL-177.4 g 
UEL-1.2 g

Present study, 20140.022′′ PAE SS bracket with 0.019 × 0.025′′ SS wire 
Placement of ligature with artery forceps
Grp. I: Alastik Easy to Tie
Grp. II: Super Slick Mini Stix 
Grp. IIII: Power “O” modules 
Grp. IV: 0.009′′ Stainless Steel ligature
Both dry and wet mediums at different time intervalsDry
Grp. I: 270 g 
Grp. II: 443 g 
Grp. III: 526 g 
Grp. IV: 646 g
Wet
Grp. I: 343 g 
Grp. II: 464 g 
Grp. III: 678 g 
Grp. IV: 775 g