Research Article
Frequency and Influencing Factors of Rubber Dam Usage in Tianjin: A Questionnaire Survey
Table 2
Respondents’ years of working experience and rubber dam usage.
| | | Total | Internship | Work ≤ 1 year | 1 year < work ≤ 5 years | 5 years < work ≤ 10 years | 10 years < work ≤ 20 years | Work > 20 years |
| | Have used rubber dam | | | | | | | | | Yes | 145 (63.3%) | 10 (55.6%) | 8 (72.7%) | 26 (57.8%) | 45 (76.3%) | 31 (63.3%) | 25 (53.2%) | | No | 84 (36.7%) | 8 (44.4%) | 3 (27.3%) | 19 (42.2%) | 14 (23.7%) | 18 (36.7%) | 22 (46.8%) |
| | Use rubber dam in caries filling | | | | | | | | | Never use | 104 (45.4%) | 10 (55.6%) | 3 (27.3%) | 22 (48.9%) | 19 (32.2%) | 24 (49.0%) | 26 (55.3%) | | Occasionally use | 86 (37.6%) | 8 (44.4%) | 7 (63.6%) | 19 (42.9%) | 25 (42.4%) | 15 (30.6%) | 12 (25.5%) | | Often use | 38 (16.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (9.1%) | 4 (8.9%) | 15 (25.4%) | 10 (20.1%) | 8 (17.0%) | | Always use | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.1%) |
| | Use rubber dam in root canal treatment | | | | | | | | | Never use | 91 (39.7%) | 9 (50.0%) | 4 (36.4%) | 18 (40.0%) | 14 (23.7%) | 23 (46.9%) | 23 (48.9%) | | Occasionally use | 77 (33.6%) | 8 (44.4%) | 5 (45.5%) | 17 (37.8%) | 20 (33.9%) | 13 (26.5%) | 14 (29.8%) | | Often use | 54 (23.6%) | 1 (5.6%) | 2 (18.2%) | 10 (22.2%) | 22 (37.3%) | 11 (22.4%) | 8 (17.0%) | | Always use | 7 (3.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (5.1%) | 2 (4.1%) | 2 (4.3%) |
| | Mastery degree of rubber dam usage | | | | | | | | | Level 0 | 32 (14.0%) | 2 (11.1%) | 1 (9.1%) | 6 (13.3%) | 7 (11.9%) | 5 (10.2%) | 11 (23.4%) | | Level 1 | 93 (40.6%) | 13 (72.2%) | 8 (72.7%) | 18 (40.0%) | 14 (23.7%) | 22 (444.9%) | 18 (38.3%) | | Level 2 | 80 (34.9%) | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (18.2%) | 17 (37.8%) | 29 (49.2%) | 16 (32.7%) | 14 (29.8%) | | Level 3 | 24 (10.5%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (8.9%) | 9 (15.3%) | 6 (12.2%) | 4 (8.5%) |
| | Total | 229 | 18 | 11 | 45 | 59 | 49 | 47 |
|
|
