Research Article
Influence of the Smile Line on Smile Attractiveness in Short and Long Face Individuals
Table 4
Pairwise comparisons (Mann–Whitney U test) between the three groups of scorers for the 10 smile types.
| | Lay people versus orthodontist | Laypeople versus general practitioner | Orthodontist versus general practitioner |
| Short face | +2 mm gingival display | 0.296 | 0.577 | 0.588 | −2 mm gingival display | 0.770 | 0.378 | 0.599 | 0 mm gingival display | 0.601 | 0.322 | 0.830 | +4 mm gingival display | 0.423 | 0.576 | 0.791 | −4 mm gingival display | 0.069 | 0.537 | 0.260 | Long face | +2 mm gingival display | 0.007 | 0.205 | 0.117 | −4 mm gingival display | 0.762 | 0.215 | 0.333 | 0 mm gingival display | 0.006 | 0.795 | 0.004 | −2 mm gingival display | 0.083 | 0.167 | 0.656 | +4 mm gingival display | 0.141 | 0.132 | 0.956 |
|
|