Review Article
Zinc, Copper, and Iron in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
Table 2
Zn/Cu ratios calculated from different studies.
| Reference | Biomarker | Controls | OSMF | Total sample | Difference in Zn/Cu (OSMF-control) |
| Gupta et al. [12] | Serum | 0.87 | 0.72 | 50 | −0.15 | Varghese et al. [50] | Serum | 0.92 | 0.85 | 100 | −0.07 | Nayak et al. [65] | Serum | 0.88 | 0.92 | 40 | 0.04 | Balpande and Sathawane [23] | Serum | 1.72 | 1.09 | 60 | −0.63 | Ayinamudi and Narsimhan [63] | Serum | 0.05 | 0.04 | 21 | −0.01 | Shettar [31] | Serum | 0.96 | 0.76 | 60 | −0.2 | Neethi et al. [55] | Serum | 0.73 | 0.7 | 60 | −0.03 | Khanna et al. [34] | Serum | 1.47 | 1.32 | 60 | −0.15 | Kode and Karjodkar [28] | Serum | 1.48 | 2.05 | 45 | 0.57 | Kode and Karjodkar [28] | Saliva | 13.23 | 14.7 | 45 | 1.47 | Hosthor et al. [29] | Serum | 0.77 | 0.19 | 60 | −0.58 | Shetty et al. [30] | Saliva | 0.78 | 0.28 | 100 | −0.5 | Yadav et al. [35] | Saliva | 1.19 | 0.47 | 100 | −0.72 | More and Patel [26] | Serum | 2.92 | 0.86 | 60 | −2.06 |
|
|