Research Article

Association between the Anatomy of the Mandibular Canal and Facial Types: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis

Table 3

Analysis of the association between the prevalence of anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and facial type (independent of side).

VariableFacial type value
TotalBrachyfacialMesofacialDolichofacial
(%) (%) (%) (%)

Location: independent of side1169 (48.7)68 (65.4)98 (55.4)3 (4.5)<0.0001
2116 (33.4)15 (14.4)56 (31.6)45 (68.2)
362 (17.9)21 (20.2)23 (13.0)18 (27.3)

Bifid type: independent of sideI38 (11.0)18 (17.3)12 (6.8)8 (12.1)0.0032
II19 (5.5)3 (2.9)7 (4.0)9 (13.6)
III.3 (0.9)0 (0.0)3 (1.7)0 (0.0)
IV2 (0.6)0 (0.0)1 (0.6)1 (1.5)
Absent285 (82.1)83 (79.8)154 (87.0)48 (72.7)

Anterior loop type: independent of sideA155 (44.7)46 (44.2)78 (44.1)31 (47.0)0.7553
B98 (28.2)26 (25.0)56 (31.6)16 (24.2)
C85 (24.5)30 (28.8)38 (21.5)17 (25.8)
Absent9 (2.6)2 (1.9)5 (2.8)2 (3.0)