Research Article

Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants

Table 9

Analyses of implant survival.

VariableGroupsImplantsImplant failuresCSR (%)Significance test
PlacedOverallEarly/late

Age10–1970100(1)
20–2970100
30–397022/097.1
40–4918621/198.9
50–5924095/496.3
60–6919270/796.4
70–79380100
80–8930100

GenderFemale434135/897.0(2)
Male30173/497.7

JawMaxilla368147/796.2(2)
Mandible37761/598.4

PositionAnterior17273/495.9(2)
Posterior572135/897.7

IndicationSingle16551/497.0(1)
Post hoc test(3):
Full ≠ partial:
Partial45275/298.5
Full12682/693.7

Bone quantityA300100(1)
B32054/198.4
C365134/996.4
D2720/292.6
E00

Bone quality1370100(1)
2392114/797.2
326384/497.0
45010/198.0

Implant diameter3.5 mm15572/595.5(1)
4.0 mm447106/497.8
4.5 mm12220/298.4
5.0 mm30100
5.5 mm1510/193.3

Implant length7 mm3110/196.8(1)
9 mm17672/596.0
11 mm20241/398.0
13 mm19874/396.5
15 mm12811/099.2
17 mm70100

ISQ at insertion<50711/085.7(1)
Post hoc test(3):
60–69 ≠ 80–89:
50–593210/196.9
60–6911281/792.9
70–7934695/497.4
80–891580100

ISQ at loading<50000/0(1)
Post hoc test(3):
60–69 ≠ 80–89:
50–59600/0100
60–699570/792.6
70–7926740/498.5
80–8916110/199.4

(1)Pearson chi-square; (2)Fisher’s exact test; (3)pairwise Fisher’s exact tests (Bonferroni-corrected significance levels).