Research Article
Supplied Food Consistency and Oral Functions of Institutionalized Elderly
Table 2
Sensitivity and specificity of oral function tests to detect the subjects who were supplied processed food.
| | Cutoff point | Raw data by measuring device | Standardized criteria | Sensitivity | Specificity | Likelihood ratio | AUR | Sensitivity | Specificity | Likelihood ratio | AUR |
| Xerostomia | | | | | | 0.667 | 0.222 | 0.857 | 0.444 | Oral hygiene status (TCI) | 53.0 | 0.593 | 0.538 | 1.284 | 0.571 | 0.630 | 0.222 | 0.810 | 0.426 | Oral hygiene status | 2.8 | 0.556 | 0.577 | 1.313 | 0.593 | | | | | Occlusal force | 585.8 | 0.407 | 0.423 | 0.706 | 0.498 | 0.333 | 0.519 | 0.692 | 0.426 | Tongue and labium function | 3.4 | 0.556 | 0.577 | 1.313 | 0.585 | 0.963 | 0.000 | 0.963 | 0.481 | Tongue pressure | 13.6 | 0.556 | 0.538 | 1.204 | 0.585 | 0.963 | 0.148 | 1.130 | 0.556 | Masticatory function | 60.0 | 0.593 | 0.615 | 1.541 | 0.613 | 0.778 | 0.333 | 1.167 | 0.556 | Swallowing function | 0.1 | 0.556 | 0.538 | 1.204 | 0.538 | 0.074 | 0.963 | 2.000 | 0.519 |
|
|