Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals

Table 2

Mean canal transportation and centering ratio of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix files at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex.

File	Parameter	1 mm (mean ± SD)	3 mm (mean ± SD)	5 mm (mean ± SD)	7 mm (mean ± SD)
One-G	Transportation	0.014 ± 0.066^a	0.007 ± 0.047^a	0.029 ± 0.069^a	0.017 ± 0.044^a
	Centering ratio	0.461 ± 0.287^a	0.614 ± 0.294^a	0.443 ± 0.212^a	0.673 ± 0.174^a
EdgeGlidePath	Transportation	0.002 ± 0.032^a	0.011 ± 0.06^a	0.07 ± 0.197^a	0.019 ± 0.055^a
	Centering ratio	0.459 ± 0.352^a	0.493 ± 0.229^a	0.643 ± 0.305^a	0.639 ± 0.349^a
Neolix	Transportation	0.019 ± 0.052^a	0.004 ± 0.051^a	0.03 ± 0.086^a	0.03 ± 0.068^a
	Centering ratio	0.537 ± 0.269^a	0.487 ± 0.283^a	0.381 ± 0.265^a	0.434 ± 0.281^a

Different superscripted letters indicate a significant difference between the groups ().