Geometrical Approaches for the Accurate Identification of Normal Vertical Positions of Sella and Nasion Points in Cephalograms

Jena, Ashok Kumar; Nayyer, Nida; Sharan, Jitendra; Behera, Binod Kumar; Marya, Anand

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2705416

International Journal of Dentistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2705416 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2705416

Geometrical Approaches for the Accurate Identification of Normal Vertical Positions of Sella and Nasion Points in Cephalograms

Ashok Kumar Jena,¹Nida Nayyer,¹Jitendra Sharan,¹Binod Kumar Behera,²and Anand Marya^3,4

Academic Editor: Marco Farronato

Received17 Aug 2022

Revised31 Oct 2022

Accepted02 Nov 2022

Published23 Nov 2022

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study is to identify the normal vertical positions of sella (S) and nasion (N) points in subjects with a normal inclination of anterior cranial bases. Materials and Methods. Lateral cephalograms of 117 subjects who had a normal ∠SN-FH plane (7° ± 1°), ∠SN-palatal plane (9° ± 2°), ∠FH-palatal plane (1° ± 1°), and cranial base angles (131° ± 4°) were included in the study. Various linear and angular parameters and ratios were evaluated to determine the normal vertical positions of S and N points. An unpaired t-test was used to identify any significant differences between males and females. The value of 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results. Among subjects with the normal inclinations of SN, FH, and palatal planes and cranial base angle, the mean values of ∠Ar-S-Ptm, ∠S-Ptm-Ar, and ∠S-Ar-Ptm were 59.38° ± 3.52°, 59.70° ± 3.21°, and 60.84° ± 3.56°, respectively, forming an almost equilateral triangle between S, Ar, and Ptm points. The mean values of ∠Ba-S-PNS, ∠S-PNS-Ba, and ∠S-Ba-PNS were 59.56° ± 3.17°, 59.72° ± 3.47°, and 60.76° ± 3.11°, respectively, forming another approximate equilateral triangle between S, Ba, and PNS points. The mean S-FH to N-FH ratio was 0.67 ± 0.06% for the whole sample, but it was significantly greater in males (0.69 ± 0.07%) compared to females (0.65 ± 0.06%) (). Conclusions. Two approximate equilateral triangles were formed between S, Ar, and Ptm points; and S, Ba, and PNS points in subjects with normal inclinations of SN, FH, and palatal planes and cranial base angle. The S-FH to N-FH ratio was an excellent guide to locating the normal vertical position of S and N points.

1. Introduction

Identification of the accurate sagittal positions of the maxilla and mandible is an important aspect of correct diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. Many cephalometric analyses like ANB angle [1], Wit’s appraisal [2], W angle [3], Beta angle [4], Yen angle [5], anteroposterior dysplasia [6], AB plane angle [7], angle of convexity [7], Steiner analysis [8], AXD angle [9], anteroposterior Dysplasia Indicator [10], JYD angle [11], quadrilateral analysis [12], McNamara maxilla-mandibular differential [13], AF-BF distance [14], and APP-BPP distance [15] have been mentioned in the literature for the precise determination of maxillary and mandibular sagittal relationships. Since the introduction of SNA (angle between sella-nasion-point A) and SNB (angle between sella-nasion-point B) angles by Reidel [1], these angles have been the most commonly used and widely accepted cephalometric parameters for the determination of sagittal jaw relationships [16–18]. This is because the anterior cranial base (Sella-Nasion plane, SN plane) is considered to be a very stable reference plane [19, 20], and the identification of landmarks like Sella (S), Nasion (N), Point-A (A), and Point-B (B) is relatively easy and simple. However, the values of SNA, SNB, and ANB angles are affected to a great extent by the length and inclination of the SN plane, making these measurements less reliable in selected cases [21]. Thus, various cephalometric analyses such as Wit’s appraisal [2], W angle [3], Beta angle [4], Yen angle [5], anteroposterior dysplasia [6], AXD angle [9], anteroposterior dysplasia indicator [10], JYD angle [11], AF-BF distance [14], and APP-BPP distance [15] have been introduced to overcome these shortcomings. Further, many researchers like Freeman [16], Taylor [17], Mills [22], Camcı, et al. [23], Sadat-Khonsari et al. [24], Johnson [25], and Moore [26] have made an attempt to address the inaccuracies in the measurement of the original SNA, SNB, and ANB angles.

It is a well-established fact that the inclination of the SN plane can significantly affect the severity assessment of the malocclusion [21–23, 27]. The inclination of the SN plane is influenced by the changes in the vertical position of either S or N point or both. Although one study [23] attempted to identify the normal vertical positions of S and N points, it did not provide any systematic method to determine the correct vertical locations of these points. Thus, a well-defined method is needed to identify the true vertical position of S and N points accurately so that correct SNA, SNB, and ANB values can be obtained. The present study describes various geometrical methods to identify the normal vertical positions of S and N points among subjects with normal inclinations of anterior cranial bases.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC No. T/IM-NF/Dentistry/21/76) and was designed as per the STROBE statement guidelines. Orthodontic record files of 537 subjects who had either completed or were undergoing comprehensive orthodontic treatment between January, 2015, and July, 2021, were reviewed. Of 537 subjects, 117 (M = 54, F = 63) fulfilled the selection criteria. The inclusion criteria included the following:(i)Good quality pretreatment lateral cephalograms with adequate hard tissue details(ii)Age between 18–30 years(iii)Normal inclination of the SN plane to the Frankfort horizontal plane, (7° ± 1°) [28](iv)Normal inclination of the SN plane to the palatal plane, (9° ± 2°) [29](v)Normal angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the palatal plane, (1° ± 1°) [30](vi)Normal cranial base angle (basion-sella-nasion angle, 131° ± 4°) [31]

Subjects with a history of trauma to the maxillofacial region, comprehensive orthodontic treatment, functional jaw orthopedics, surgery for maxilla and mandible, congenital deformities like cleft lip and palate, facial asymmetry, and any systemic disease affecting craniofacial growth were excluded.

All cephalograms were recorded with the same machine (NewTom GiANO, Italy) with similar exposure parameters (80Kvp, 10 mAs, and 1.6 seconds). All subjects were positioned with the Frankfort horizontal plane (FH plane) parallel to the floor and teeth in centric occlusion while recording the lateral cephalograms. The heads of all the subjects were kept erect by voice commands. Nine hard tissue landmarks were identified on each cephalogram (Figure 1). The FH plane was considered a reference plane. Ten linear and 12 angular parameters and one ratio were used to establish the normal vertical positions of S and N points (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2

Linear parameters. (1) S-Ba, the linear distance between S and Ba; (2) Ba-Ptm, the linear distance between Ba and Ptm; (3) Ba-PNS, the linear distance between Ba and PNS; (4) S-Ar, the linear distance between S and Ar; (5) Ar-Ptm, the linear distance between Ar and Ptm; (6) Ar-PNS, the linear distance between Ar and PNS; (7) S-Ptm, the linear distance between S and Ptm; (8) S-PNS, the linear distance between S and PNS; (9) S-FH, the linear perpendicular distance from S to FH plane, (10) N-FH, the linear perpendicular distance from N to FH plane. S-FH: N-FH, the ratio of S-FH and N-FH distances in %.

Figure 3

Angular parameters. (1) ∠Ba-S-Ptm, the angle between Ba, S and Ptm; (2) ∠Ba-S-PNS, the angle between Ba, S and PNS; (3) ∠Ar-S-Ptm, the angle between Ar, S and Ptm; (4) ∠Ar-S-PNS, the angle between Ar, S and PNS; (5) ∠S-Ba-PNS, the angle between S, Ba, and PNS; (6) ∠S-Ba-Ptm, the angle between S, Ba, and Ptm; (7) ∠S-Ar-PNS, the angle between S, Ar and PNS; (8) ∠S-Ar-Ptm, the angle between S, Ar and Ptm; (9) ∠S-PNS-Ba, the angle between S, PNS and Ba; (10) ∠S-PNS-Ar, the angle between S, PNS and Ar; (11) ∠S-Ptm-Ba, the angle between S, Ptm and Ba; (12) ∠S-Ptm-Ar, the angle between S, Ptm and Ar.

All the lateral cephalograms were traced manually by the same evaluator. The linear magnification was corrected and calibrated according to the magnification factor, using the radio-opaque ruler (calibration marker). A digital caliper measured the linear parameters to the nearest 0.01 mm and the angular measurements were done using a protractor to the nearest 0.5°. The assessment of intraobserver errors and the reproducibility of landmark location and measurement errors were analyzed by retracing the 15 randomly selected cephalograms after 3 weeks. The intraobserver reliability of the measurements was calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the measurements obtained by the evaluator at both times.

2.1. Statistical Analyses

All the statistical analyses were performed in the SPSS software (for Windows 7, version 20, SPSS, Chicago, Ill). Descriptive statistics were used. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to examine the normality of the data. An unpaired t-test determined the significant differences between males and females. The value of 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

3. Results

The ICC for linear and angular measurements ranged from 0.89 to 0.95 and 0.93 to 0.97, respectively, showing excellent reliability between the measurements. The descriptive parameters are mentioned in Table 1. The mean age of the subjects was 22.21 ± 3.92 years. The mean angle between the FH and palatal plane (∠FH-PP), FH and SN plane (∠FH-SN), and palatal and SN plane (∠PP-SN) were 1.06° ± 0.84°, 7.18° ± 0.79°, and 8.26° ± 0.99° respectively. The mean cranial base angle (∠N-S-Ba) was 129.82° ± 2.35°.

Table 2 depicts the values of various linear parameters of all the subjects. All the linear parameters except N-FH distance were significantly greater among males compared to females. S-Ar, Ar-Ptm, and S-Ptm were of almost equal lengths while S-Ba, Ba-PNS, and S-PNS distances were nearly equal to each other. The mean S-Ar, Ar-Ptm, and S-Ptm values were 33.79 ± 3.18 mm, 33.92 ± 2.88 mm, and 34.52 ± 3.04 mm, respectively, thus forming almost an approximate equilateral triangle between the S, Ar, and Ptm points. Similarly, the mean values of S-Ba, Ba-PNS, and S-PNS were 44.10 ± 3.36 mm, 43.75 ± 5.07 mm, and 44.77 ± 3.38 mm, respectively, forming another approximate equilateral triangle between the S, Ba, and PNS points. The mean S-FH to N-FH ratio was 0.67 ± 0.06% for the whole sample, but it was significantly more in males 0.69 ± 0.07%, compared to females 0.65 ± 0.06% ( = 0.002).

The details of various angular parameters have been mentioned in Table 3. All the angular parameters were compared between males and females. The mean values of ∠Ar-S-Ptm, ∠S-Ptm-Ar, and ∠S-Ar-Ptm were 59.38° ± 3.52°, 59.70° ± 3.21°, and 60.84° ± 3.56°, respectively, thus forming almost an equilateral triangle between “S, Ar, and Ptm points.” The mean values of ∠Ba-S-PNS, ∠S-PNS-Ba, and ∠S-Ba-PNS were 59.56° ± 3.17°, 59.72° ± 3.47°, and 60.76° ± 3.11°, respectively, forming another approximate equilateral triangle between the S, Ba, and PNS points.

From the results of all linear and angular parameters, it was found that two equilateral triangles can be drawn across the normal craniofacial structure. The first approximate equilateral triangle was formed among the S, Ar, and Ptm points (named as the KUKU triangle) and another between the S, Ba, and PNS points (named as the PUCHU triangle). For both the triangles, the S point was the common vertex point, and we considered the “KUKU triangle” more stable and reliable compared to the “PUCHU triangle.” Hence, the “KUKU triangle” and S-FH to N-FH ratio (S-FH: N-FH) could be used as a reference triangle and ratio, respectively, for the identification of normal vertical positions of S and N points in subjects with aberrant anterior cranial bases.

4. Discussion

Effective orthodontic treatment always depends on the accurate diagnosis of malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms are one of the essential aids for the diagnosis of malocclusion. Identifying hard tissue landmarks like Sella (S), Nasion (N), Point-A, and Point-B is very easy. The anterior cranial base completes 90% of its growth in the first 5 years of life [32] and undergoes very minimal change during the growth period [27]; thus, the Sella-Nasion plane (SN plane) is used as a standard reference plane. For this reason, SNA, SNB, and ANB angles are the most accepted and widely used cephalometric parameters for assessing sagittal maxillary and mandibular relationships [16–18]. However, gradual shifting of S and N points takes place throughout the development of craniofacial structures [19], and also, the migration of N point continues for several years parallel to the craniofacial development [33]. To avoid the influence of growth on the inclination of the SN plane, we included the lateral cephalograms of subjects who had completed their craniofacial growths for the present study.

We observed in the present study that when the SN plane is normally inclined to FH and palatal planes, the cranial base angle is within normal limits; two approximately equilateral triangles are formed between S, Ar, and Ptm points (KUKU triangle) and S, Ba, and PNS points (PUCHU triangle) having S point as a common vertex. An important source of influence on the morphology of structures surrounding sella is the growth process of the posterior cranial base [34]. The deflection of the posterior cranial base (S-Ba) could result in a greater alteration in the position of the Ba point compared to the Ar point [34]. However, a compensatory mechanism exists to make up for the position of the glenoid fossa associated with cranial base flexure [34]. The posterior leg (S-Ba) of the cranial base angle (N-S-Ba) can be tipped anteriorly or posteriorly, and according to Andria et al. [35], these are compensated by variable lengths of the posterior cranial base, such as an acute posterior leg that places the mandible forward. This action is negated by a long posterior leg (S-Ba) that places both the mandible (Ar) and basion (Ba) posteriorly and vice-versa. Thus, we considered the KUKU triangle more stable and reliable than the PUCHU triangle for the identification of the normal vertical position of sella point. We also observed that the distance from the S point to the FH plane is approximately 69% and 65% of the distance from the N point to the FH plane among male and female subjects, respectively. Similar to our observation, Camcı and Salmanpour also reported a 69.62% S-FH to N-FH ratio among subjects with normal SN-FH angles [23].

A significant variation in the angle between SN and FH planes can mislead orthodontists in interpreting abnormal jaw positions, even if the jaws are normally positioned. Thus, one must be cognizant of the SN-FH angulation if the SN plane is used as a reference plane for cephalometric analyses. There has been no study so far in the literature assessing the normal relationships between points S, Ar, Ba, Ptm, and PNS. This is the first attempt at exploring these measurements of the craniofacial skeleton. The KUKU triangle and S-FH to N-FH ratio can be used as standard reference triangle and ratio to determine the normal vertical position of Sella and Nasion points among subjects with abnormal inclinations of anterior cranial bases.

4.1. Limitations and Future Recommendations

Although there are newer alternatives to the conventional methods of cephalometric analysis such as the use of reduced FOV CT, this study was an audit of existing records [36–39]. Hence, future studies can be planned to explore comparisons between newer methods and our proposed methods to establish reliability.

5. Conclusions

The following conclusions were drawn from the present study:(1)The triangles formed between S, Ar, and Ptm points and S, Ba, and PNS points were almost equilateral among subjects with normal inclinations of SN, FH, and palatal planes.(2)An almost equilateral triangle between S, Ar and Ptm points indicated the normal vertical position of the S point.(3)The vertical distance of the S point was nearly 67% of the vertical distance of the N point from the FH plane.

Data Availability

All data related to the study can be provided on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to patients KUKU and PUCHU, whose aberrant SN planes inspired us to do this study.

References

R. A. Riedel, “The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 142–145, 1952.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Jacobson, “The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Bhad, S. Nayak, and U. H. Doshi, “A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Baik and M. Ververidou, “A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the beta angle,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Neela, R. Mascarenhas, and A. Husain, “A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the yen angle,” World Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
W. L. Wylie, “The assessment of antero-posterior dysplasia,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 97–107, 1947.
View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Antoun, C. Cameron, W. Sew Hoy, P. Herbison, and M. Farella, “Evidence of secular trends in a collection of historical craniofacial growth studies,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Steiner, “Cephalometrics for you and me,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 729–755, 1953.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Beatty, “A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 303–315, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Kim and J. J. Vietas, “Antero-posterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 619–633, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jarvinen, “The JYD angle: a modified method of establishing sagittal apical base relationship,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 4, pp. 243–249, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. DiPaolo, C. Philip, A. Maganzini, and J. D. Hirce, “The quadrilateral analysis: an individualized skeletal assessment,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. McNamara Jr., “A method of cephalometric evaluation,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 449–469, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. T. Huanca Ghislanzoni, T. Baccetti, D. Toll, E. Defraia, J. A. McNamara Jr., and L. Franchi, “Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of class II malocclusion,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 394–400, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Nanda and R. M. Merill, “Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 328–344, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Freeman, “Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 162–171, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Taylor, “Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A and point B, and the effect upon ANB,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 143–163, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hussels and R. S. Nanda, “Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 411–423, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Afrand, C. P. Ling, S. Khosrotehrani, C. Flores-Mir, and M. O. Lagravère-Vich, “Anterior cranial-basetime-related changes: a systematic review,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 21–32.e6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. M. Arat, M. Rübendüz, and A. A. Akgül, “The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 374–380, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Patcas, D. B. Wiedemeier, G. Markic, P. Beit, and H. Keller, “Evidence of secular trend in mandibular pubertal growth,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 680–685, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. Bronfman, G. Janson, A. Pinzan, and T. L. Rocha, “Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 43–51, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Camcı and F. Salmanpour, “Cephalometric evaluation of anterior cranial base slope in patients with skeletal Class I malocclusion with low or high SNA and SNB angles,” Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 171–176, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sadat-Khonsari, H. Dathe, M. Knösel, W. Hahn, D. Kubein-Meesenburg, and O. Bauss, “Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle,” Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 152–158, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Johnson, “A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Moore, “Variation of the sella-nasion plane and its effect on SNA and SNB,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 24–26, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Kamaluddin, M. T. Cobourne, M. Sherriff, and D. Bister, “Does the Eastman correction over- or under-adjust ANB for positional changes of N?” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 719–723, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Wolfe, E. Araujo, R. G. Behrents, and P. H. Buschang, “Craniofacial growth of class III subjects six to sixteen years of age,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sathler, A. Pinzan, T. M. F. Fernandes, R. R. d Almeida, and J. F. C. Henriques, “Comparative study of dental cephalometric patterns of Japanese-Brazilian, Caucasian and mongoloid patients,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 50–57, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Ricketts, “Cephalometric synthesis: an exercise in stating objectives and planning treatment with tracings of the head roentgenogram,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 647–673, 1960.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. G. Barbosa, E. Araujo, R. G. Behrents, and P. H. Buschang, “Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with class II division 2 malocclusion,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 914–920, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Costello, R. D. Rivera, J. Shand, and M. Mooney, “Growth and development considerations for craniomaxillofacial surgery,” Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 377–396, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bastir, A. Rosas, and P. O’Higgins, “Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 209, no. 5, pp. 637–654, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Yoon and C. H. Chung, “Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated class I and class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 190–196, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Papageorgiou, V. Koretsi, and A. Jäger, “Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiological study,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 98–105, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Farronato, C. Maspero, A. Abate, C. Grippaudo, S. T. Connelly, and G. M. Tartaglia, “3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements,” European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 6295–6302, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Farronato, G. Baselli, B. Baldini, G. Favia, and G. M. Tartaglia, “3D cephalometric normality range: auto contractive maps (ACM) analysis in selected caucasian skeletal class I age groups,” Bioengineering, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 216, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vandekar, P. Kulkarni, and N. Vaid, “Role of cranial base morphology in determining skeletal anteroposterior relationship of the jaws,” Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 245–248, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Marya, “Are orthodontic decisions consistent?” Evidence-Based Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 120-121, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ashok Kumar Jena et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

519

Downloads

409

Citations