Research Article

Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Table 3

The mean and percentage change (increase) in the distance between different maxillary posterior roots and MSF among age groups.

RootsGroups I and IIGroups II and III
Mean (SD)
(%)
Groups III and IV
Mean (SD)
(%)
Groups I and IV
Mean (SD)
(%)

B UFPMean (SD)0.03 (3.46)1.07 (4.02)0.24 (2.34)1.34 (3.68)
Percent (%)0.6322.294.0928.09

P UFPMean (SD)0.32 (2.74)0.88 (3.65)0.44 (3.71)1.64 (4.32)
Percent (%)7.5819.388.1238.86

USPMean (SD)0.31 (3.52)0.49 (3.82)0.24 (2.94)1.04 (3.34)
Percent (%)13.1418.357.5944.07

MB UFMMean (SD)0.27 (2.68)0.64 (2.69)0.6 (2.06)1.51 (3.96)
Percent (%)21.0941.2927.40117.97

DB UFMMean (SD)0.21 (3.12)0.3 (3.73)0.25 (3.25)0.76 (3.54)
Percent (%)16.6720.4114.1260.32

P UFMMean (SD)0.2 (1.49)0.36 (3.24)0.33 (2.83)0.89 (3.01)
Percent (%)21.0531.3021.8593.68

MB USMMean (SD)0.05 (2.51)0.19 (2.43)0.21 (3.26)0.45 (2.91)
Percent (%)8.0628.3624.4272.58

DB USMMean (SD)0.05 (1.58)0.17 (1.81)0.14 (2.04)0.36 (3.82)
Percent (%)5.1016.5011.6736.73

P USMMean (SD)0.37 (2.36)0.19 (2.96)0.74 (2.88)1.3 (3.27)
Percent (%)40.6614.8450.34142.86

MB UTMMean (SD)0.24 (1.80)0.28 (2.17)0.1 (2.12)0.62 (3.34)
Percent (%)17.0216.975.1843.97

DB UTMMean (SD)0.21 (2.49)0.1 (3.06)1.02 (4.35)1.33 (4.03)
Percent (%)16.286.6763.75103.10

P UTMMean (SD)0.21 ± 1.900.05 ± 2.040.09 ± 2.00.35 ± 2.86
Percent (%)12.732.694.7121.21