Research Article
Analyzing the Causes and Frequency of Early Dental Implant Failure among Iranians: An Epidemiological Study
Table 2
Frequency distribution of each of the variables related to implant and surgery mean ± N.
| Implant factors | N (%) | Early failure | p Value |
| Implant manufacturer | | | | Implantium | 249 (25.3%) | 9 (3.6) | | DIO | 304 (30.9%) | 9 (3) | | Dentis | 263 (26.8%) | 13 (4.9) | | ITI | 81 (8.2%) | 6 (7.4) | | Biohorizon | 30 (3.1%) | 0 (0) | | Zimmer | 6 (0.6%) | 0 (0) | | Biodenta | 9 (0.9%) | 3 (33.3) | | Swiss | 1 (0.1%) | 0 (0) | | Medentis | 26 (2.6%) | 2 (7.7) | | Peed Anyone | 9 (0.9%) | 0 (0) | | THOMMEN SPI | 1 (0.1%) | 0 (0) | | Biotem | 4 (0.4%) | 0 (0) | | Implant surface | | | | SLA | 864 (87.9) | 39 (4.5) | | SLA | 65 (6.6) | 12 (3.1) | | Active | 50 (5.1) | 1 (2.0) | | RBM | 4 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | | Level of implant placement | | | | Tissue level | 166 (16.9) | 10 (6.0) | | Bone level | 817 (83.1) | 32 (3.9) | |
|
|
RBM, resorbable blasting media; SLA, sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched.
|