In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins
Table 2
Comparison of microhardness of nanohybrid composite resins according to mouthrinses and time.
Mouthrinses
Nanohybrid composite resins (media ± SD)
Filtek Z350XT
Tetric EvoCeram
Polofil NHT
Baseline
14 days
21 days
Baseline
14 days
21 days
Baseline
14 days
21 days
Artificial saliva
80.91 ± 5.62Aa
70.83 ± 7.69ABb
66.30 ± 8.18Bb
45.63 ± 2.24Aa
40.59 ± 2.18Aab
36.56 ± 2.36Ab
80.61 ± 4.39Aa
70.16 ± 4.09Bb
64.63 ± 4.62Bc
CHX al 0.12%
78.87 ± 6.50Aa
70.25 ± 4.73ABb
63.41 ± 3.37BCc
43.53 ± 2.95Aa
40.21 ± 2.72Aa
37.61 ± 2.75Aa
85.71 ± 0.92Aa
69.48 ± 4.91Bb
63.26 ± 4.87Bc
CPC al 0.075%
76.11 ± 3.86Aa
66.51 ± 4.21Bb
57.16 ± 6.56Cc
42.88 ± 2.39Aa
40.34 ± 2.33Aa
38.63 ± 1.88Aa
83.08 ± 6.32Aa
70.46 ± 7.90Bb
62.38 ± 6.40Bc
CHX 0.12% + CPC 0.05%
77.78 ± 4.00Aa
78.29 ± 1.83Aa
75.44 ± 3.15Aa
43.65 ± 1.24Aa
40.50 ± 2.31Aa
40.06 ± 2.35Aa
87.64 ± 5.64Aa
85.56 ± 5.71Aa
83.06 ± 4.34Aa
Note: Different capital letters indicate significant differences by columns. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences by rows (separate composite resins).