Research Article

In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins

Table 2

Comparison of microhardness of nanohybrid composite resins according to mouthrinses and time.

MouthrinsesNanohybrid composite resins (media ± SD)
Filtek Z350XTTetric EvoCeramPolofil NHT
Baseline14 days21 daysBaseline14 days21 daysBaseline14 days21 days

Artificial saliva80.91 ± 5.62Aa70.83 ± 7.69ABb66.30 ± 8.18Bb45.63 ± 2.24Aa40.59 ± 2.18Aab36.56 ± 2.36Ab80.61 ± 4.39Aa70.16 ± 4.09Bb64.63 ± 4.62Bc
CHX al 0.12%78.87 ± 6.50Aa70.25 ± 4.73ABb63.41 ± 3.37BCc43.53 ± 2.95Aa40.21 ± 2.72Aa37.61 ± 2.75Aa85.71 ± 0.92Aa69.48 ± 4.91Bb63.26 ± 4.87Bc
CPC al 0.075%76.11 ± 3.86Aa66.51 ± 4.21Bb57.16 ± 6.56Cc42.88 ± 2.39Aa40.34 ± 2.33Aa38.63 ± 1.88Aa83.08 ± 6.32Aa70.46 ± 7.90Bb62.38 ± 6.40Bc
CHX 0.12% + CPC 0.05%77.78 ± 4.00Aa78.29 ± 1.83Aa75.44 ± 3.15Aa43.65 ± 1.24Aa40.50 ± 2.31Aa40.06 ± 2.35Aa87.64 ± 5.64Aa85.56 ± 5.71Aa83.06 ± 4.34Aa

Note: Different capital letters indicate significant differences by columns. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences by rows (separate composite resins).