Research Article | Open Access

Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Decha Samana, Jessada Tariboon, "Periodic Boundary Value Problems for First-Order Impulsive Functional Integrodifferential Equations with Integral-Jump Conditions", *International Journal of Differential Equations*, vol. 2014, Article ID 791240, 12 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/791240

# Periodic Boundary Value Problems for First-Order Impulsive Functional Integrodifferential Equations with Integral-Jump Conditions

**Academic Editor:**Kanishka Perera

#### Abstract

By developing a new comparison result and using the monotone iterative technique, we are able to obtain existence of minimal and maximal solutions of periodic boundary value problems for first-order impulsive functional integrodifferential equations with integral-jump conditions. An example is also given to illustrate our results.

#### 1. Introduction

The theory of impulsive differential equations is now being recognized as not only being richer than the corresponding theory of differential equations without impulses, but also representing a more natural framework for mathematical modelling of many real world phenomena and applications; see [1â€“5] and the references therein. Monotone iterative technique coupled with the method of upper and lower solutions has provided an effective mechanism to prove constructive existence results for initial and boundary value problems for nonlinear differential equations; see [6]. However, many papers have studied applications of the monotone iterative technique to impulsive problems; see, for example, [7â€“15]. In those articles, the authors assumed that , that is, a short-term rapid change of the state (jump condition) at impulse point , depends on the left side of the limit of .

In [16â€“18] the authors discussed some classes of first-order impulsive problems with the impulsive integral conditions: where and , . Furthermore, Thaiprayoon et al. [19] have used such technique to investigate the existence criteria of extremal solutions of multipoint impulsive problems to include multipoint jump conditions for , . Recently, Thiramanus and Tariboon [20] have given some results on impulsive differential inequalities with integral-jump conditions of the form: where . We note that if , , , then the above inequalities mean that the bound of jump condition at is a functional of past states on the interval before the impulse point .

In spirit of the results from [20], this paper considers the periodic boundary value problem for first-order impulsive functional integrodifferential equation (PBVP) with integral-jump conditions: where , , , , , , , , , , and .

We first introduce a new concept of lower and upper solutions, then establish a new comparison principle, and discuss the existence and uniqueness of the solutions for first-order impulsive functional integrodifferential equations with integral-jump conditions. By using the method of upper and lower solutions and monotone iterative technique, we obtain the existence of extreme solution of PBVP (4). Finally, we give an example to illustrate the obtained results.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Let , , , and be continuous everywhere except for some , at which and exist and , , and let be continuous everywhere except for some at which and exist and , . Clearly, is a Banach space with the norm . Let . A function is called a solution of PBVP (4) if it satisfies (4).

*Definition 1. *We say that the functions , are lower and upper solutions of PBVP (4) if there exist , , , , , and such that
where
where

Denote . We prove the comparison principle by using the following lemma (see [20]).

Lemma 2. *Let , ,and, , , be constants and let , . If
**
then, for ,
*

Now we are in the position to establish a new comparison principle, which plays an important role in monotone iterative technique.

Lemma 3. *Assume that satisfies**
where constants , , , , , and , . If
**
where , , and are given by Definition 1 with and
**
then , .*

*Proof. **Case **1*. One has . Suppose that there exists such that and distinguish two cases.*Case (a)*. for all , ; then
so that is nondecreasing in , and then . Since , then is a constant function , which implies that
getting a contradiction.*Case (b)*. for some . Let ; then there exists , for some such that or . Without loss of generality, we only consider , and for the case the proof is similar.

From (11), it is easy to see that
We consider the inequalities
From Lemma 2, we have

Let in (18); then

so that

If , then (20) with , for all implies

This contradicts the condition (12).

Suppose that . If for , then Lemma 2 provides that
Since
and integrating (11) from into , we obtain
Hence,
We note that if , then .

Let in (25); then
From (26), we have
which gives
contradicting condition (12). For the case , the proof is similar.*Case **2*. One has . Set . It follows that , and for ,
and for , ,
In view of Case 1, we see that on , and therefore on . This completes the proof.

Corollary 4. *Assume that satisfies
**
where constants , , , , , and , . If
**
where
**
and , are given by Lemma 3, then , for .*

Corollary 5. *Assume that satisfies
**
where constants , , , , , and , , and condition (32) holds. Then , for .*

Let us consider the following linear problem of PBVP (4): where , , , , , , , ,â€‰â€‰, , and .

Lemma 6. *A function is a solution of (35) if and only if is a solution of the following impulsive integral equation:
**
where and
*

*Proof. *If is a solution of (35), by directly integrating, we obtain

If is a solution of the above-mentioned integral equation, then

The proof is complete.

Lemma 7. *Let , , , , , , , , , , and and assume that
**Then problem (35) has a unique solution in .*

*Proof. *We define the mapping by
for any and is given by Lemma 6. Then
The above result and condition (40) imply that is a contractive mapping, which completes the proof.

Corollary 8. *Let , , , , , , , , , , and and assume that
**
Then problem (35) has a unique solution in .*

#### 3. Main Results

In this section, we establish existence criteria for solutions of the PBVP (4) by the method of lower and upper solutions and monotone iterative technique. For , , we write if for all . In such a case, we denote , .

Theorem 9. *Assume the existence of lower and upper solutions for PBVP (4) and also suppose that the following conditions hold.** The function satisfies
**
where , , , and , , where , , , , and .** The functions satisfy
**
where , , where and , .**If inequalities (12) and (40) hold, then there exists a solution of PBVP (4) such that , for .*

*Proof. *We consider the following modified problem relative to PBVP (4):
where and
If is such that on , then is a solution of PBVP (4) if and only if is a solution of (46). We will show that (46) is solvable and that every solution of (46) satisfies on . Suppose that is a solution of (46). We will show that . Let . Then, we have since and
By Lemma 3, we get on ; that is, . Similar arguments show that .

It remains to prove that (46) possesses at least one solution. By Lemma 6, PBVP (46) is equivalent to the following impulsive integral equation:
where . For any , define a continuous compact operator by
Let , such that , , , and take the compact sets, , , , and . Since is continuous, then we can choose a constant , such that , . For , we see that any solution of
satisfies