Research Article
Implementation of TAGE Method Using Seikkala Derivatives Applied to Two-Point Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems
Table 5
Comparison of three parameters between GS, AGE, and TAGE methods at
.
| | | Methods | n | | | 512 | 1024 | 2048 | 4096 | 8192 |
| Problem | Number of iterations | GS | 683426 | 2438784 | 8576162 | 29590144 | 99505380 | AGE | 96956 | 355282 | 1283208 | 4563320 | 15938400 | TAGE | 77538 | 280098 | 878054 | 2885812 | 10416768 | Execution time | GS | 49.45 | 210.66 | 809.53 | 5758.67 | 32519.13 | AGE | 9.00 | 39.00 | 202.00 | 1313.00 | 8221.00 | TAGE | 7.00 | 31.00 | 141.00 | 817.00 | 5383.00 | Hausdorff distance | GS | | | | | | AGE | | | | | | TAGE | | | | | |
| Problem | Number of iterations | GS | 476706 | 1697208 | 5950370 | 20447642 | 68375230 | AGE | 67786 | 248034 | 894086 | 3171216 | 11036748 | TAGE | 53606 | 187674 | 673146 | 2127768 | 7526132 | Execution time | GS | 35.43 | 155.72 | 755.20 | 4615.31 | 25815.45 | AGE | 6.00 | 27.00 | 141.00 | 915.00 | 5662.00 | TAGE | 4.00 | 21.00 | 107.00 | 613.00 | 3941.00 | Hausdorff distance | GS | | | | | | AGE | | | | | | TAGE | | | | | |
|
|