#### Abstract

We consider nonlinear impulsive differential equations with *ψ*-exponential and *ψ*-ordinary dichotomous linear part in a Banach space.
By the help of Banach’s fixed-point principle sufficient conditions are found for the existence
of *ψ*-bounded solutions of these equations on and .

#### 1. Introduction

Impulsive differential equations are an adequate mathematical apparatus for simulation of numerous processes and phenomena in biology, physics, chemistry, control theory, and so forth which during their evolutionary development are subject to short time perturbations in the form of impulses. The qualitative investigation of these processes began with the work of Mil’man and Myshkis [1]. For the first time such equations were considered in an arbitrary Banach space in [2–5].

The problem of -boundedness and -stability of the solutions of differential equations in finite dimensional Euclidean spaces, introduced for the first time by Akinyele [6], has been studied since then by many authors. A beautiful explanation about the benefits of such a use of weighted stability and boundedness can be found, for example, in [7]. Inspired by the famous monographs of Coppel [8], Daleckii and Krein [9], and Massera and Schaeffer [10], where the important notion of exponential and ordinary dichotomy for ordinary differential equations is considered in detail, Diamandescu [11–13] and Boi [14, 15] introduced and studied the -dichotomy for linear differential equations in a finite dimensional Euclidean space, where is a nonnegative continuous diagonal matrix function. The concept of -dichotomy for arbitrary Banach spaces was introduced and studied in [16, 17]. In this case is an arbitrary bounded invertible linear operator.

A weighted dichotomy for linear differential equations with impulse effect in arbitrary Banach spaces is considered in [18] for a -exponential dichotomy and in [19] for the particular case of -ordinary dichotomy.

This paper considers nonlinear perturbed impulsive differential equations with a -dichotomous liner part in an arbitrary Banach space. We will show that some properties of these equations will be influenced by the corresponding -dichotomous impulsive homogeneous linear equation. Sufficient conditions for existence of -bounded solutions of this equations on and in case of -exponential or -ordinary dichotomy are found.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Let be an arbitrary Banach space with norm and identity . By we will denote or and by either or .

We consider the nonlinear impulsive differential equationwhere is a finite or infinite sequence in . We will say that condition (H1) is satisfied if the following conditions hold:(H 1.1) is a continuous operator-valued function with values in the Banach space of all linear bounded operators acting in with the norm .(H 1.2).(H 1.3)The function is continuous with respect to .(H 1.4) are continuous operators.(H 1.5) and .

Consider the corresponding linear impulsive equation

*Definition 1. *By a solution of the impulsive equation (1), (2) (or (3), (4)) we will call a function which for satisfies (1) (or (3)) and for satisfies condition (2) (or (4)) and is continuous from the left.

As shown, for instance in [3, 4], if the operators have bounded inverse ones, then for the impulsive linear equation (3), (4) there exists a Cauchy operator by means of which each solution of (3), (4) for which has the form

Let be the subspace of all invertible operators in whose inverse operators are bounded too. Let be continuous with respect to operator function.

*Definition 2. *A function is said to be -bounded on if is bounded on .

Let be the space of all -bounded on functions with values in which are continuous for , have discontinuities of the first kind for , and are continuous from the left, which is a Banach space with the norm

*Definition 3. *The linear impulsive equation (3), (4) is said to have a -exponential dichotomy on if there exist a pair of mutually complementary projections and and positive constants such thatEquation (3), (4) is said to have a -ordinary dichotomy on if (7) hold with . In this case we denote .

*Remark 4. *For for all we obtain the notion exponential and ordinary dichotomy for impulsive differential equations considered in [3, 20, 21]. That is why our main results in this paper appear as a generalization of some results there.

Let us introduce the principal Green function of the nonhomogeneous equation corresponding to (3), (4) with the projections and from the definition for -exponential dichotomy

*Definition 5. *The nonnegative function is said to be integrally bounded on if for some the following inequality holds:

*Definition 6. *The sequence of nonnegative numbers is said to be integrally bounded if for some the following inequality holds:

For each integrable on function we introduce the notation and for each summable on sequence of nonnegative numbers the notation

*Definition 7. *Let be an arbitrary number. We will say that the function and the operators satisfy the condition (H2) with the operator function , if there exist positive functions and sequences of nonnegative numbers such that (H 2.1);(H 2.2);(H 2.3);(H 2.4).

*Definition 8. *We say that the function and the operators belong to the class if the condition (H2) is fulfilled with the operator function , the functions , are integrally bounded on and , , and the sequences and are integrally bounded and , .

*Definition 9. *We say that the function and the operators belong to the class if the condition (H2) is fulfilled with the operator function , the functions , are integrable on and , , and the sequences and are summable on and , .

#### 3. Main Results

Theorem 10. *Let the following conditions be fulfilled:*(1)*The linear impulsive differential equation (3), (4) (i.e., the linear part of (1), (2)) has -exponential dichotomy on with projections and .*(2)*Conditions (H1) and (H2) hold.*(3)*The function and the operators belong to the class .*(4)*The operators have bounded inverse ones.**Then for an arbitrary , for sufficient small values of , , , the impulsive equation (1), (2) has a unique solution , which is defined for and for which .*

*Proof. *Let . Consider in the space the operator defined by the formulawhere is defined by (8).

Now we will show that the ball is invariant with respect to and the operator is contracting.

First we will prove that the operator maps the ball into itself. One hasWe will estimate the addends in (15). For we obtainFrom the estimates (16) it follows that Hence by and we obtain Thus the operator maps the ball into it self.

Now we will prove that the operator is a contraction in the ball . Let . Using the same technique as above we obtainHenceThus by and the operator is a contraction in the ball .

From Banach’s fixed point principle, the existence of a unique fixed point of the operator follows.

It is not hard to verify that each solution of the impulsive differential equation (1), (2) which lies in the ball is also a solution of the equationand vice versa.

Corollary 11. *If the conditions of Theorem 10 are fulfilled and if, moreover, , then is a unique solution of (1), (2) in .*

Theorem 12. *Let the following conditions be fulfilled:*(1)*The linear impulsive differential equation (3), (4) (i.e., the linear part of (1), (2)) has -exponential dichotomy on with projections and .*(2)*Conditions (H1) and (H2) hold.*(3)*The function and the operators belong to the class .*(4)*The operators have bounded inverse ones.**Then for an arbitrary , for sufficient small values of , , , the impulsive equation (1), (2) has a unique solution , which is defined for and for which .*

*Proof. *Let . In the proof of Theorem 10 it was mentioned that each solution of the impulsive differential equation (1), (2) that remains for in the ball satisfies the equation and vice versa.

We consider again in the space the operator defined in (13). For we obtain the following estimate:Thus by sufficiently small and the operator maps the ball into it self.

Now we will prove that the operator is a contraction in the ball . Let . We obtainHence Thus by sufficiently small and the operator is a contraction in the ball .

From Banach’s fixed point principle follows the existence of a unique fixed point of the operator .

Theorem 13. *Let the following conditions be fulfilled:*(1)*The linear impulsive differential equation (3), (4) (i.e., the linear part of (1), (2)) has -exponential dichotomy on with projections and .*(2)*Conditions (H1) and (H2) hold.*(3)*The function and the operators belong to the class .*(4)*The operators have bounded inverse ones.**Then for any by sufficient small there exists such that the impulsive equation (1), (2) has for each with a unique solution on for which and .*

*Proof. *Let and be a solution of (1), (2) that remains for in the ball From the results obtained in [18, Theorem 1 and Remark 2] it follows that such satisfies the integral equationwhere . The converse is also true: a solution of the (26) satisfies the differential equation (1), (2) for .

Let and . We consider in the space the operator defined by the formulaFirst we will prove that the operator maps the ball into it self. Indeed one hasFor the first addend with we obtain Using the same technique as in the proof of Theorem 10 we obtain for the second addend the estimateHence by and we obtain Thus the operator maps the ball into it self.

Now we will prove that the operator is a contraction in the ball . Let . We obtain as in the proof of Theorem 10 the estimateBy and the operator is a contraction in the ball .

From Banach’s fixed point principle the existence of a unique fixed point of the operator follows.

Theorem 14. *Let the following conditions be fulfilled:*(1)*Conditions (H1) and (H2) hold.*(3)*The function and the operators belong to the class .*(4)*The operators have bounded inverse ones.**Then for any by sufficient small , , , there exists such that the impulsive equation (1), (2) has for each with a unique solution on for which and .*

*Proof. *Let , , and . We consider again in the space the operator defined by formula (27).

First we will prove that the operator maps the ball into it self. One hasFor the first addend with we obtain For the second addend with as in the proof of Theorem 12 one hasThus the operator maps the ball into it self.

Let . As in the proof of Theorem 12 we obtain the estimate Hence by the operator is a contraction in the ball .

From Banach’s fixed point principle the existence of a unique fixed point of the operator follows.

In the proof of Theorem 13 it was already mentioned that every solution of the impulsive differential equation (1), (2) which lies in the ball fulfills the equality and vice versa.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgment

This research has been partially supported by Plovdiv University NPD Grant NI15-FMI-004.