Research Article | Open Access

# Spatiotemporal Dynamics of an HIV Infection Model with Delay in Immune Response Activation

**Academic Editor:**Peiguang Wang

#### Abstract

We propose and analyse an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection model with spatial diffusion and delay in the immune response activation. In the proposed model, the immune response is presented by the cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) cells. We first prove that the model is well-posed by showing the global existence, positivity, and boundedness of solutions. The model has three equilibria, namely, the free-infection equilibrium, the immune-free infection equilibrium, and the chronic infection equilibrium. The global stability of the first two equilibria is fully characterized by two threshold parameters that are the basic reproduction number and the CTL immune response reproduction number . The stability of the last equilibrium depends on and as well as time delay in the CTL activation. We prove that the chronic infection equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when the time delay is sufficiently small, while it loses its stability and a Hopf bifurcation occurs when passes through a certain critical value.

#### 1. Introduction

HIV is a virus that attacks the CD4^{+} T cells and reduces their number in the body. It is known that when the number of these cells is less than 200 cells per , the patient enters the phase of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This phase is characterized by the appearance of opportunistic infections caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi or by the appearance of certain types of cancer. From the world health organization (WHO) [1], HIV continues to be a major global public health issue, having claimed more than 35 million lives so far. In 2016, 1 million people died from HIV-related causes globally. Also, there were approximately 36.7 million people living with HIV at the end of 2016 with 1.8 million people becoming newly infected in 2016 globally. Therefore, many mathematical models have been developed to better understand the dynamics of HIV infection. One of the earliest of these models was presented by Nowak and Bangham [2] that considers three populations: uninfected target cells, productive infected cells, and free viral particles. Rong et al. [3] extended the model of [2] by including the infected cells in eclipse stage (unproductive infected cells) and considered that a portion of these cells returns to the uninfected state. In 2014, Hu et al. [4] replaced the bilinear incidence rate in [3] by a saturated infection rate and they studied the global stability of equilibria. In 2015, Maziane et al. [5] improved the model of [4] by considering the Hattaf’s incidence rate [6] that includes the common types such as the bilinear incidence rate, the saturated incidence rate, the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response [7, 8] and the Crowley-Martin functional response [9].

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) cells are responsible for cellular immunity and they play an important role in antiviral defense by killing the productive infected cells. For this, Lv et al. [10] proposed an HIV model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and CTL immune response. In 2016, Maziane et al. [11] generalized and extended the model of Lv et al. [10] by considering the mobility of cells and virus. They assumed that the motion of virus follows the Fickian diffusion and proposed the following model: where , , , , and represent the densities of uninfected CD T cells, unproductive infected cells, productive infected cells, and free virus particles and CTL cells at location and time , respectively. The positive parameters , , , and are the production rate of uninfected cells, the rate at which infected cells in the eclipse stage become productive infected cells, the production rate of virions by infected cells, and the proliferation rate of CTL cells, respectively. The positive constants , , , , and are, respectively, the death rates of uninfected CD T cells, unproductive infected cells, productive infected cells, free virus, and CTL cells. The unproductive infected cells return to the uninfected cells at rate while the productive infected cells are killed by CTL at rate . In model (1), the infection transmission process is modeled by Hattaf’s incidence rate [6] of the form , where , , and are the saturation factors measuring the psychological or inhibitory effect and is the infection coefficient. Here is the Laplacian operator and is the diffusion coefficient of virus.

In the reality, the activation of the immune response is not instantaneous. When the virus invades the body, the immune system takes time to recognize and react to the virus. Therefore, system (1) becomes where denotes the time needed for the activation of the CTL immune response, namely, the immunological delay. The other parameters have the same biological meaning as system (1). In addition, we consider our model (2) with homogenous Neumann boundary condition and initial conditions where is a bounded domain in with smooth boundary , is Hölder continuous in , and is the outward normal derivative on .

The rest of the paper is outlined as follows. In the next section we investigate the well-posedness and equilibria for system (2)–(4). The stability analysis and the existence of Hopf bifurcation are studied in Section 3. Finally, a brief conclusion is given in Section 4.

#### 2. Well-Posedness and Equilibria

In this section, we establish the existence, positivity, and boundedness of solutions of problem (2)–(4) because this model describes the evolution of a cell population. Hence the densities of cells should remain nonnegative and bounded. In addition, we determine the basic reproduction number, the CTL immune response reproduction number, and equilibria of the model (2)–(4).

Before proceeding, we shall set some notations and terminology. will denote a Banach space over a real or complex field. will denote the Banach space of -valued functions on , with supremum norm, where . Here, . If is a continuous function from to and , then denotes the element of given by , .

Proposition 1. *For any initial conditions satisfying (4), there exists a unique solution of problem (2)–(4) defined on and this solution remains nonnegative and bounded for all .*

*Proof. *Let and . We define by Hence, system (2)–(4) can be written of the form where and . Obviously, is locally Lipschitz in . By [12–16], we deduce that system (2) admits a unique local solution on , where is the maximal existence time for solution of system (2). In addition, is a lower solution of each solution of system (2); then we deduce that , , , and .

Next, we prove the boundedness of solutions by considering the following function: From system (2), we obtain where . Thus, Then, , , , and are bounded.

To prove the boundedness of , from system (2), we get where .

Using the comparison principle [17], we have , where is the solution of the problem Since , , we have that is bounded.

Therefore, we have proved that , , , , and are bounded on . Hence, it follows from the standard theory for semilinear parabolic systems [18] that .

As in [11], the basic reproduction number of virus in the absence of spatial dependence is given byIn addition to , we define the CTL immune response reproduction number of our model by which represents the threshold level to activate the CTL cells response.

Theorem 2. (i)*If , system (2) has always an infection-free equilibrium of the form .*(ii)*If , system (2) has an immune-free equilibrium of the form with , , , and .*(iii)*If , system (2) has a chronic infection equilibrium of the form with , , , , and .*

#### 3. Stability Analysis and Hopf Bifurcation

First, we discuss the global stability of the infection-free equilibrium and the immune-free equilibrium .

Theorem 3. (i)*The infection-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable if .*(ii)*The immune-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable if and*

*Proof. *By using the method proposed by Hattaf and Yousfi [19], we propose the following Lyapunov functional for system (2)–(4) at :where . For convenience, we let and , for any . By calculation, we haveNoting that , the time derivative of along the positive solutions of system (2) satisfies Therefore, if . In addition, it is not hard to verify that the largest compact invariant set in is just the singleton . From LaSalle invariance principle [20], we deduce that is globally asymptotically stable.

Next, we construct the Lyapunov functional for system (2)–(4) at : where . Obviously, the function has a global minimum at 1 and satisfies . Calculating the time derivative of along the positive solutions of system (2) and applying , we obtain Using the arithmetic-geometric inequality, we get Therefore, if and .

Obviously, the condition is equivalent to In addition, if and only if , , , , and . Hence, the largest compact invariant set in is the singleton . This proves the global stability of by using LaSalle’s invariance principle [20].

From the above theorem, we deduce that the time delay in the activation of CTL immune response has no effect on the stability of and . Next we investigate the stability and existence of Hopf bifurcation at the chronic infection equilibrium .

When , system (2) becomes system (1). By Theorem 3 (iii) [11], we deduce the following result.

Theorem 4. *When , the chronic infection equilibrium with immune response is globally asymptotically stable if and *

Now, we study the existence of Hopf bifurcation by regarding time delay as the bifurcation parameter.

Let be the eigenvalues of on with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions, and for , let be the space of eigenfunctions corresponding to in . Let be an orthonormal basis of , and . Then, , .

The linearization of system (2) at the constant solution can be expressed by where , , and ,

Let . For each , is invariant under the operator , and is an eigenvalue of if and only if it is satisfying the characteristic equationThen, at , the associated characteristic equation of system (2) is given by where

For , we suppose that (26) has a purely imaginary root with . Substituting in (26) and separating the real and the imaginary parts, we get Squaring and adding the two equations of (28), we have where Letting we obtain

Denote

Suppose that (31) has positive roots , , where . From (28), we have Therefore Then are a pair of purely imaginary roots of (26) with .

Define

From Theorem 4 and by a similar argument as that in [21, 22], we have the following results.

Lemma 5. *Suppose that and (22) hold. *(i)*If one of the following holds: (a) ; (b) , , , and or and there exist such that and ; (c) , , , , or and there exist such that and ; (d) , , , , , and , then all the roots of (26) have negative real parts when .*(ii)*If all the conditions (a)–(d) of (i) are not satisfied, then all roots of (26) have negative real parts for all .*

We consider to be a root of (26) satisfying and . Differentiating the two sides of (26) with respect to and noticing that is a function of , then From (28) we obtain