Mathematical Modeling in Virology by Differential EquationsView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Khalid Hattaf, Noura Yousfi, "Qualitative Analysis of a Generalized Virus Dynamics Model with Both Modes of Transmission and Distributed Delays", International Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2018, Article ID 9818372, 7 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9818372
Qualitative Analysis of a Generalized Virus Dynamics Model with Both Modes of Transmission and Distributed Delays
We propose a generalized virus dynamics model with distributed delays and both modes of transmission, one by virus-to-cell infection and the other by cell-to-cell transfer. In the proposed model, the distributed delays describe (i) the time needed for infected cells to produce new virions and (ii) the time necessary for the newly produced virions to become mature and infectious. In addition, the infection transmission process is modeled by general incidence functions for both modes. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis of the model is rigorously established and many known viral infection models with discrete and distributed delays are extended and improved.
Viruses are microscopic organisms that need to penetrate into a cell of their host to duplicate and multiply. Many human infections and diseases are caused by viruses such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that is responsible for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), Ebola that can cause an often fatal illness called Ebola hemorrhagic fever, and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) that can lead to chronic infection, cirrhosis, or liver cancer.
In viral dynamics, infection processes and virus production are not instantaneous. In reality, there are two kinds of delays: one in cell infection and the other in virus production. In the literature, these delays are modeled by discrete time delays [1–6], by finite distributed delays [7–9], and by infinite distributed delays [9–12]. The delay in cell infection can be modeled by an explicit class of latently infected cells (see, e.g., [13–15]).
On the other hand, viruses can spread by two fundamental modes, one by virus-to-cell infection through the extracellular space and the other by cell-to-cell transfer involving direct cell-to-cell contact [16–19]. For these reasons, we propose the following generalized virus dynamics model with both modes of transmission and distributed delays: where , , and are the concentrations of uninfected cells, infected cells, and free virus particles at time , respectively. The uninfected cells are produced at rate , die at rate , and become infected either by free virus at rate or by direct contact with an infected cell at rate . Hence, the term denotes the total infection rate of uninfected cells. The parameters and are, respectively, the death rates of infected cells and free virus. is the production rate of free virus by an infected cell. In this proposed model, we assume that the virus or infected cell contacts an uninfected target cell at time , and the cell becomes infected at time , where is a random variable taken from a probability distribution . The term represents the probability of surviving from time to time , where is the death rate for infected but not yet virus-producing cells. Similarly, we assume that the time necessary for the newly produced virions to become mature and infectious is a random variable with a probability distribution . The term denotes the probability of surviving the immature virions during the delay period, where is the average life time of an immature virus. Therefore, the integral describes the mature viral particles produced at time .
As in , the incidence functions and for the two modes are continuously differentiable and satisfy the following hypotheses:(), for all ; (or is a strictly monotone increasing function with respect to when ) and , for all and .(), for all and .() is a strictly monotone increasing function with respect to (or when is a strictly monotone increasing function with respect to ), for any fixed and .() is a monotone decreasing function with respect to and .
Biologically, the four hypotheses are reasonable and consistent with the reality. For more details on the biological significance of these four hypotheses, we refer the reader to the works [20–22]. Further, the general incidence functions and include various types of incidence rates existing in the literature.
The probability distribution functions and are assumed to satisfy and for . When and , where is the Dirac delta function, system (1) becomes a model with two discrete time delays and which is the generalization of the models presented in [2–6]. When and , where is the virus-to-cell infection rate, we get the HIV infection model with distributed intracellular delays investigated by Xu . On the other hand, the model proposed by Lai and Zou  is a special case of our model (1) when , , and , where is the cell-to-cell transmission rate. It is important to note that the model studied by Nelson and Perelson in  is a particular case of .
The main objective of this work is to investigate the dynamical behavior of system (1). For this end, we start with the existence, the positivity, and boundedness of solutions, which implies that our model is well posed. After that, we determine the basic reproduction number and steady states of the model. The global stability of the disease-free equilibrium and the chronic infection equilibrium is established in Sections 3 and 4 by constructing appropriate Lyapunov functionals. An application of our results is presented in Section 5. Finally, the conclusion is summarized in Section 6.
2. Well-Posedness and Equilibria
For biological reasons, we suppose that the initial conditions of system (1) satisfy Define the Banach space for fading memory type as follows: where is a positive constant and .
Proof. By the fundamental theory of functional differential equations [24–26], system (1) with initial condition has a unique local solution on , where is the maximal existence time for solution of system (1).
First, we prove that for all . In fact, supposing the contrary, let be the first time such that and . From the first equation of system (1), we have which is a contradiction. Then for all .
From the second and third equations of system (1), we get which implies that and are nonnegative for all .
Now, we prove the boundedness of the solutions. From the first equation of (1), we have which implies that Then is bounded. Let Since is bounded and , the integral in is well defined and differentiable with respect to . Hence, where and Thus, , which implies that is bounded.
It remains to prove that is bounded. By third equation of system (1) and the boundedness of , we deduce that Then . Therefore, is also bounded. We have proved that all variables of system (1) are bounded which implies that and the solution exists globally.
If in addition to (2) we assume that for all , we easily obtain the following result.
Obviously, system (1) has always one disease-free equilibrium of the form . Therefore, the basic reproduction of system (1) can be defined by As in , can be rewritten as , where is the basic reproduction number corresponding to virus-to-cell infection mode and is the basic reproduction number corresponding to cell-to-cell transmission mode.
Theorem 3. (i)If , then system (1) has a unique disease-free equilibrium of the form .(ii)If , the disease-free equilibrium is still present and system (1) has a unique chronic infection equilibrium of the form with , , and .
Proof. It is clear that is the unique steady state of system (1) when . To find the other equilibria, we resolve the following system: From (11), we obtain the equation We have , which implies that . Thus, there is no biological equilibrium when .
Define the function on the interval by Clearly, , , and Hence, if , there exists another biologically meaningful equilibrium with , , and . This completes the proof.
3. Stability of the Disease-Free Equilibrium
In this section, we establish the stability of the disease-free equilibrium.
Theorem 4. The disease-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when and becomes unstable when .
Proof. To study the global stability of , we consider the following Lyapunov functional: Calculating the time derivative of along the positive solution of system (1), we get We have lim , which implies that all omega limit points satisfy . Thus, it is sufficient to consider solutions for which . By (10) and –, we obtain Therefore, when . In addition, it is not hard to verify that the largest compact invariant set in is the singleton . From LaSalle invariance principle , we deduce that the disease-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when .
On the other hand, the characteristic equation at is given by where . Define a function on by We have and , which implies that has a positive real root. Consequently, is unstable for .
4. Stability of the Chronic Infection Equilibrium
In this section, we investigate the global stability of the chronic infection equilibrium by assuming that and the functions and satisfy, for all , the following hypothesis: Therefore, we get the following result.
Proof. We define a Lyapunov functional as follows: where , . Clearly, attains its strict global minimum at and . Hence, . Further, the functional is nonnegative.
In order to simplify the presentation, we will use the following notations: and for any . The time derivative of along the positive solution of system (1) is given by Applying and , we obtain Hence, Since the function is strictly monotonically increasing with respect to , we have From , we have Since for , we have with equality if and only if , , and . It follows from LaSalle invariance principle that is globally asymptotically stable.
In this section, we consider the following HIV infection model with distributed delays: where and are nonnegative constants that measure the saturation effect. The parameters and are the virus-to-cell infection rate and the cell-to-cell transmission rate, respectively. The other parameters have the same biological meanings as in model (1). Further, system (26) is a special case of (1) with and . Notice that the HIV infection model presented by Lai and Zou  is a particular case of our model (26), it suffices to take and . In addition, system (26) always has a disease-free equilibrium and a unique chronic infection equilibrium when .
Corollary 6. (i)If , then the disease-free equilibrium of system (26) is globally asymptotically stable.(ii)If , then the disease-free equilibrium becomes unstable and the chronic infection equilibrium of (26) is globally asymptotically stable.
In this work, we have proposed a mathematical model that describes the dynamics of viral infections, such as HIV and HBV, and takes into account the two modes of transmission and the two kinds of delays, one in cell infection and the other in virus production. The transmission process for both modes is modeled by two general incidence functions that include many types of incidence rates existing in the literature. Further, the two delays are modeled by infinite distributed delays. Under some assumptions on the general incidence functions, we have proved that the global stability of the proposed model is fully determined by one threshold parameter that is the basic reproduction number . In addition, the viral infection models with infinite distributed delays and the corresponding results presented in several previous studies are extended and generalized.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- A. V. M. Herz, S. Bonhoeffer, R. M. Anderson, R. M. May, and M. A. Nowak, “Viral dynamics in vivo: limitations on estimates of intracellular delay and virus decay,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 14, pp. 7247–7251, 1996.
- D. Li and W. Ma, “Asymptotic properties of a HIV-1 infection model with time delay,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 683–691, 2007.
- H. Zhu and X. Zou, “Impact of delays in cell infection and virus production on HIV-1 dynamics,” Mathematical Medicine and Biology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99–112, 2008.
- G. Huang, W. Ma, and Y. Takeuchi, “Global analysis for delay virus dynamics model with BeddingtonDeAngelis functional response,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1199–1203, 2011.
- K. Hattaf, N. Yousfi, and A. Tridane, “A delay virus dynamics model with general incidence rate,” Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 181–190, 2014.
- K. Hattaf, N. Yousfi, and A. Tridane, “Stability analysis of a virus dynamics model with general incidence rate and two delays,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 221, pp. 514–521, 2013.
- Y. Nakata, “Global dynamics of a cell mediated immunity in viral infection models with distributed delays,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 375, no. 1, pp. 14–27, 2011.
- A. M. Elaiw and N. H. Alshamrani, “Global analysis for a delay-distributed viral infection model with antibodies and general nonlinear incidence rate,” Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 317–335, 2014.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “A class of delayed viral infection models with general incidence rate and adaptive immune response,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 254–265, 2016.
- P. W. Nelson and A. S. Perelson, “Mathematical analysis of delay differential equation models of HIV-1 infection,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 73–94, 2002.
- R. Xu, “Global dynamics of an HIV-1 infection model with distributed intracellular delays,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2799–2805, 2011.
- Y. Yang, H. Wang, Z. Hu, and F. Liao, “Global stability of in-host viral model with humoral immunity and Beddington-Deangelis functional response,” International Journal of Life Science and Medical Research, vol. 3, pp. 200–209, 2013.
- L. Rong and A. S. Perelson, “Asymmetric division of activated latently infected cells may explain the decay kinetics of the HIV-1 latent reservoir and intermittent viral blips,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2009.
- C. Selinger and M. G. Katze, “Mathematical models of viral latency,” Current Opinion in Virology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 402–407, 2013.
- S. Pankavich, “The effects of latent infection on the dynamics of HIV,” Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 281–303, 2016.
- M. Marsh and A. Helenius, “Virus entry: open sesame,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 729–740, 2006.
- W. Mothes, N. M. Sherer, J. Jin, and P. Zhong, “Virus cell-to-cell transmission,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 17, pp. 8360–8368, 2010.
- Q. Sattentau, “Avoiding the void: cell-to-cell spread of human viruses,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 815–826, 2008.
- P. Zhong, L. M. Agosto, J. B. Munro, and W. Mothes, “Cell-to-cell transmission of viruses,” Current Opinion in Virology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2013.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “A generalized virus dynamics model with cell-to-cell transmission and cure rate,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2016, no. 1, article 174, 2016.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “A numerical method for a delayed viral infection model with general incidence rate,” Journal of King Saud University - Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 368–374, 2016.
- X.-Y. Wang, K. Hattaf, H.-F. Huo, and H. Xiang, “Stability analysis of a delayed social epidemics model with general contact rate and its optimal control,” Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1267–1285, 2016.
- X. Lai and X. Zou, “Modeling HIV-1 virus dynamics with both virus-to-cell infection and cell-to-cell transmission,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 898–917, 2014.
- J. K. Hale and J. Kato, “Phase space for retarded equations with infinite delay,” Funkcialaj Ekvacioj. Serio Internacia, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 11–41, 1978.
- Y. Hino, S. Murakami, and T. Naito, Functional-Differential Equations with Infinite Delay, vol. 1473 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991.
- Y. Kuang, Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
- J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn Lunel, Introduction to Functional-Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993.
- W. Wang and W. Ma, “Hepatitis C virus infection is blocked by HMGB1: A new nonlocal and time-delayed reaction--diffusion model,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 320, pp. 633–653, 2018.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “Global dynamics of a delay reaction-diffusion model for viral infection with specific functional response,” Computational & Applied Mathematics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 807–818, 2015.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “A generalized HBV model with diffusion and two delays,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2015.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “A numerical method for delayed partial differential equations describing infectious diseases,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2741–2750, 2016.
- K. Hattaf and N. Yousfi, “Global stability for reaction-diffusion equations in biology,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1488–1497, 2013.
Copyright © 2018 Khalid Hattaf and Noura Yousfi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.