Research Article  Open Access
Jing Gao, Takashi Iida, Hiroyuki Mizutani, Sadanori Sakaguchi, Shuji Murakami, Atsushi Shimizu, Tomohisa Wada, "The Implementation of a 2/4/8 Antennas Configurable Diversity OFDM Receiver for Mobile HDTV Application", International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, vol. 2009, Article ID 303627, 9 pages, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/303627
The Implementation of a 2/4/8 Antennas Configurable Diversity OFDM Receiver for Mobile HDTV Application
Abstract
Two preFFT adaptive array (AA) antenna combiners and a postFFT carrier diversity (CD) combiner are integrated with a Japan Terrestrial digital TV (ISDBT) OFDM receiver using 90 nm 7M1P CMOS process. A 2/4/8antenna diversity receiver can be configured and a lowcost 4 antenna diversity reception system can be realized in one LSI by making use of the AACD twostage diversity combining method. Mobile reception performance is increased by 1.63 times using a denoise filter circuit and SPLINE interpolator under urban 6path Rayleigh fading (TU6) model with 2antenna postFFT carrier diversity (2CD) combing mode. The die area is 49 and the power consumption is 310 mW.
1. Introduction
TV broadcasting technology is rapidly shifting to the digital domain and the services are expanding not only to home TV but also to ubiquitous devices such as cellar phones, PCs, and automotive TVs. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is adopted as a modulation method for the terrestrial Integrated Services Digital Broadcasting (ISDBT) standard in Japan. OFDM is wellknown as a highspectral efficiency transmission method in a multipath environment [1].
When an OFDM receiver is used in an automobile, the Radio Frequency (RF) signal experiences a Doppler frequency shift as the automobile is moving as shown in Figure 1. The Doppler shift destroys the orthogonality between OFDM subcarrier signals and increases intercarrier interference (ICI). Therefore, it is a severe challenge to maintain the reception quality for a mobile ISDBT receiver that is acceptable for human vision.
One wellknown way to improve the performance of an OFDM receiver is to exploit spatial diversity by utilizing multiple antenna elements. In this paper, a mobile OFDM receiver LSI is described which includes two preFFT adaptive array (AA) antenna combiners and a postFFT carrier diversity (CD) combiner. Using the LSI, several combinations of AA and CD diversity systems can be used to tradeoff performance of the mobile ISDBT receiver with system cost. Additionally, directional antenna elements can be utilized to mitigate the Doppler shift. The performance of the proposed AACD scheme is evaluated by simulation and is validated in laboratory and field experiments.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, diversity receiver fundamentals are explained. The LSI chip architecture and circuits will be described in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. In Sections 5 and 6, simulation results and measurement results including field experiments will be shown. Finally, conclusions are given in Section 7.
2. Diversity Receiver Fundamentals
2.1. Use of Directional Antenna
Doppler shift () is given as
where and are speed of the automobile and light, respectively, is the carrier frequency, and is the Angle of Arrival (AOA) of the incoming signal. The maximum Doppler shift is determined as . When an automobile has one omnidirectional antenna on the roof as shown in Figure 2(a), the antenna receives all directional incoming RF waves, which is uniformly distributed within . The spectrum of the received signal is distributed over as shown in Figure 2(b).
(a)
(b)
Figure 3 shows a typical 4 space diversity antenna configuration for an automobile. Two antenna elements are set in the front and the two are set in the rear. However as the body of the automobile is made from metal, the two front antenna elements seemingly experience a similar Doppler shift, as do the two in the rear. It has been experimentally confirmed that the directional characteristic of the front antenna is obviously distorted and concentrates in the forward direction, while the rear antenna focuses to the rear direction of automobile [2]. Consequently, as illustrated in Figure 4, the received signal from the front antenna element predominantly experiences a positive Doppler shift randomly distributed within while that of rear antenna element predominantly experiences a negative Doppler shift randomly distributed within . In other words, the performance of a mobile ISDBT receiver is seemingly enhanced as the bandwidth of the Doppler spectrum is reduced by exploiting directional antenna elements.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
2.2. Two Types of Diversity Combining Methods
There are two approaches to utilize the array antenna for multicarrier transmission: preFFT adaptive array (AA) antenna and postFFT carrier diversity (CD) combining.
As shown in Figure 5(a), the AA scheme is a conventional method to employ the array antenna in which inputs from the array antenna are combined before OFDM demodulation [3–5]. Since this approach uses one set of coefficients such as for each OFDM symbol, it is an attractive solution due to low computation complexity. However, for good performance, received antenna signals should have high correlation.
(a)
(b)
On the other hand, the postFFT scheme is an advanced method to utilize the array antenna for a multicarrier system as shown in Figure 5(b). Instead of combining before OFDM demodulation, inputs are demodulated using multiple OFDM demodulations. Subcarriers are then combined accordingly in the frequency domain using the diversity combining method [6]. The PostFFT scheme therefore is an optimum approach in term of maximizing signaltonoise ratio (SNR) for each OFDM subcarrier. However, its computation complexity grows drastically as the number of antenna elements increases. The characteristics of the two diversity methods are summarized in Table 1.

3. Chip Architecture
Figure 6 shows the detailed block diagram of the receiver LSI. The UHF wireless signal is downconverted by tuners. A maximum of 4 tuner output signals are fed into one LSI and are converted to digital signals by ADCs. The first AA stage performs the array antenna signal processing and the second CD stage combines each OFDM subcarrier signal at the output of the Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT)/equalizers (EQ) processing. The twostage diversity combiners halve the number of FFT/EQ circuits from 4 to 2 but maintain equivalent mobile reception performance compared to the 4 FFT/EQs case. The number of logic gates is reduced by 39% through the using of the twostage architecture. To improve higher mobile performance, the equalizer introduces two new circuit blocks, the SPLINE interpolator and the super denoise filter, which will be explained in the following section.
4 types of diversity configurations are possible as shown in Figure 7. With each doubling of the number of antennas, SNR is improved by approximately 3 dB. For the 4antenna case, there are two possible configurations. The 4AA mode is a onechip solution that achieves the lowest cost and modest performance. The 4CD mode is a twochip solution with higher performance. Since the antenna placement on a car is usually on the front or rear windshield glass, each antenna has directional gain fluctuation due to the car body. The 4antenna system is preferable for compact to medium size cars to cover all signal angles of arrival.
4. Circuits
4.1. SPLINE Time Domain Interpolator
Figure 8 shows the newly introduced SPLINE interpolator. The subcarrier signals (see left) of FFT output are divided into two parts, data (white circle) and scattered pilots (SPs, circle with P). Those SPs are located every 12 subcarriers in one OFDM symbol and the position of the SP shifts by 3 subcarriers every OFDM symbol. In previous work [7], 2tap linear interpolation is performed by the two SPs in the linear interpolation zone. In this paper, the new SPLINE algorithm 4tap interpolation is applied. Although the SPLINE uses two more past SPs in the SPLINE interpolation zone (total 4 taps), the 3 symbols of filter latency (see symbol number ) is the same as the previous work. Then the higher interpolation accuracy is obtained without increasing the delay RAM size in the equalizer.
(a)
(b)
The 4tap FIR filter is implemented using a polyphase accumulator. Figure 9 shows a logical view of the 4tap polyphase FIR filter. The position of the I1, I2, and I3 points can be computed by changing the filter coefficients of C1, C2, C3, and C4. Those coefficients are computed using the mathematical SPLINE function. Actual coefficients of the 4tap SPLINE FIR filter are shown in Table 2.

4.2. Variable Bandwidth Super Denoise Filter
To reduce noise on the interpolated SP signals further, a variable bandwidth complex bandpass filter is introduced. The bandwidth and the center frequency are controlled by a delayprofile of the reception signal. To support fine control of the center frequency and a broad range of filter bandwidth, a twostage serially connected circuit is used as shown in Figure 10. Both stages are identical 41tap raised cosine Lowpass Filters (LPF). The bandpass position of each stage can be shifted using the complex rotation circuit, that is, complex multiplier at each input/output. Through the combination of the two stages, the complex filter bandwidth and center frequency can be controlled. The upper section of Figure 10 shows the example of a 1/4 bandwidth LPF. The shaded area is the complex bandpass filter bandwidth.
5. Simulation Results
In this section, the 4 operation modes (shown in Figure 7 above) 2CD, 4AA, 4CD, and 8AA are verified by computer simulation. To evaluate performance, directional characteristics of antenna elements are modeled based on [8]. Table 3 shows the system parameters. Mode 3 of the ISDBT standard using 64QAM modulation and Guard Interval (GI) duration is used for the simulation. Bit Error Rate (BER) is measured without Error correction. Table 4 shows the specification of the simulation parameters. 6 signals are received with different power and delay time. Since signal 2 at 30 degrees is the strongest, it is considered the desired signal while the others are considered undesired signals. The DU ratio (D/U) is the Desired to Undesired signal power ratio. Signal 1 at 0 degree is 5 dB lower power than 2.


Figure 11 shows BER performances versus SNR with Doppler shift Hz. BER performance improves with increasing number of antenna elements. 4CD shows slightly better performance than 4AA. In addition, BER performances versus Maximum Doppler shift with SNR of 30 dB are shown in Figure 12. Moving from 2CD to the other modes, there are significant Doppler performance improvements. 2CD only uses 2 front antennas and the other modes use both front and rear antennas. 8AA has 4 front antennas and 4 rear antennas.
6. Measurement Results
Figure 13 shows the measurement results with typical urban 6 path Rayleigh fading (TU6) in 2CD mode. Thanks to the newly introduced circuits, the maximum Doppler performance is improved from 41 Hz to 67 Hz (1.63 times). The 1.63 times improvement corresponds to the moving speed improvement from 73 km/h to 120 km/h at UHF35ch (605.143 MHz).
Mobile reception performance was measured in field experiments at three severe test courses in Osaka Japan. The experimental UHF channel is 13 which is broadcast from the top of Ikoma Mountain between Osaka and Nara prefecture. 64QAM, code rate of 3/4, 12segment HDTV broadcasting service is used. The three test courses are a suburban area 50 km from Ikoma broadcasting station (BS), a mountain area 40 km from the BS, and an urban area in the other side of a hill 20 km from the BS. Figure 14 shows the reception rate (error free reception duration to the total experiment duration) of those test courses. The onechip solution 4AA mode showed close performance to the twochip solution 4CD mode.
Figure 15 shows the die micrograph and the die features are summarized in Table 5. Two preFFT adaptive array (AA) antennas and a postFFT carrier diversity (CD) combiner are integrated with an ISDBT OFDM receiver in 90 nm 7M1P CMOS process occupying 49 m and dissipating 310 mW. The two stage diversity combiners result in a logic reduction of 39% over a conventional 4 FFT/EQs carrier diversity system. The total logic size and the memory size are 18 M gates and 18.4 M bits, respectively. The package is a 12 mm square 144 pin fine pitch ball grid array.

7. Conclusion
The LSI integrated two preFFT Adaptive Array (AA) and one postFFT carrier diversity (CD) combiners with an ISDBT compatible OFDM receiver in 90 nm 7M1P CMOS. A 2/4/8antenna diversity receiver can be configured. Two stage diversity methods reduce logic circuits by 39% over the 4FFT CD configuration. SPLINE interpolator and Super denoise filter circuits improve the Doppler performance by 1.63 times. This corresponds to a 73 km/h to 120 km/h increase at UHF 35ch in 2CD mode. The die area is 49 m and the power consumption is 310 mW. The LSI was successfully utilized in a real mobile TV system product in a Japan ISDBT application. Figure 16 shows a 2CD mode mobile TV reception demonstration using the product.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Takuya Koujiya for the field experiment support, and Kenichi Satou, Atsushi Suyama for the tuner device support, and Kunio Morimoto for module design.
References
 J. A. C. Bingham, “Multicarrier modulation for data transmission: an idea whose time has come,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5–14, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S.I. Matsuzawa, K. Sato, and K. Nishikawa, “Study of onglass mobile antennas for digital terrestrial television,” IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E88B, no. 7, pp. 3094–3096, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Sakaguchi, M. Hori, H. Asato et al., “An adaptive array direction control LSI for mobile digital HDTV receivers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE '05), pp. 299–300, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, January 2005, Session: 7.4 Acquisition Systems 7.43. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Asato, T. Tabata, D. H. Pham et al., “A softwareconfigurable adaptive array antenna system for ISDBT reception,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE '06), pp. 463–464, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, January 2006, Session: 11.2 Signal Processing for Multiple Ant., DVBT and DAPSK/DMT 11.21. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. H. Pham, T. Tabata, H. Asato, S. Hori, and T. Wada, “Joint hardwaresoftware implementation of adaptive array antenna for ISDBT reception,” IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E89B, no. 12, pp. 3215–3224, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Nakahara, H. Hamazumi, K. Shibuya, and M. Sasaki, “An application of diversity combination techniques to broadcasting wave relay station for ISDBT,” ITE Technical Report, vol. 25, no. 31, pp. 7–12, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Kamiyama, H. Mizutani, H. Toma et al., “A highspeed mobile OFDM receiver LSI with an iterative noisereduction filter to enhance channel estimation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE '05), pp. 193–194, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, January 2005, Session: 5.1 Digital TV Broadcast: DVB & ISDBT 5.13. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Fujimoto and T. Hori, “Effect of antenna element characteristics on antenna pattern control of array antenna,” Tech. Rep. RCS2004177, IEICE, October 2004. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Jing Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.