International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2012 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 157940 | 8 pages |

Factors Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Academic Editor: Anil K. Agarwal
Received06 Mar 2012
Accepted07 May 2012
Published10 Jul 2012


Objective. To investigate the risk factors of DR in Chinese T2DM patients. Methods. 2009 patients with T2DM were included in this cross-sectional study. All patients underwent eye examination, and the DR stage was defined by an ophthalmologist. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relation between DR and clinical variables. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk for those factors associated with DR. Results. A total of 597 T2DM patients (29.7%) had DR, of which 548 (27.3%) were nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and 49 (2.4%) were proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Positive correlations were found between DR and duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, glycated albumin, 24 hurinary albumin excretion, peripheral atherosclerosis (PA), diabetes nephropathy (DN), diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and anemia. Negative correlations were found between DR and C-peptide and glomerular filtration rate. Logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of diabetes, SBP, DN, anemia, PA, and C-peptide were each independent risk factors of DR. Conclusion. The duration of diabetes, SBP, DN, anemia, and PA are positively associated with DR in Chinese T2DM patients, while C-peptide is negatively associated with DR. Monitoring and evaluation of these related factors will likely contribute to the prevention and treatment of DR.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the fastest growing diseases in China and has become a major public health challenge. The most common complication of T2DM is diabetic retinopathy (DR), which is a leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It has been estimated that diabetic individuals are 25 times more likely than their nondiabetic counterparts to suffer severe, permanent vision loss [1]. Although the pathogenesis of DR is still not fully understood, a number of large, multicenter studies in Western populations have identified risk factors of disease onset and progression [26]. The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle study (AusDiab) identified duration of diabetes, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) as risk factors of DR [6]. The US-Based Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) demonstrated that reducing elevated blood lipids and treating anemia in T2DM patients could slow the progression of retinopathy [7]. In addition, many cross-sectional and prospective studies have been carried out in Caucasian populations, which have identified several risk factors of DR, including duration of diabetes, SBP, glycemic control, and urinary albumin [4, 6, 8, 9]. Other factors, including body mass index (BMI), serum lipids, and C-peptide, have shown varying results [4, 8, 10]. Since the current estimates of the prevalence and risk factors for DR have mostly been derived from studies of non-Asian populations, the reliability and utility of these factors in Chinese populations remain unconfirmed. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine whether the most recognized DR risk factors in the literature are similar to those in Chinese T2DM patients. These data will not only provide insights into the common and distinctive features of DR in Chinese and Caucasian populations but also identify clinically relevant factors, which may be monitored or therapeutically manipulated to reduce the frequency and severity of DR.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was performed in T2DM patients who had been admitted to the Endocrinology Department of Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital from January 2008 to December 2009. All of the patients had been admitted specifically for management of their diabetes. Diagnosis of diabetes was performed according to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria. Patients were excluded according to the presence of type 1 diabetes mellitus, any other non-type 2 diabetes (such as gestational diabetes), poor general condition, severe infection, acute cerebrovascular disease, recent surgery, impaired cardiac function (III-IV degree according to NYHA classification), or severely impaired hepatic or renal function.

2.2. Determination of Variables

Clinical data was extracted from the departments medical records for each patient and included age, gender, duration of diabetes, and previous history of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Patients’ medical examinations on the day of admission had included measurements of height, body weight, and blood pressure. BMI was calculated as kg/m2. Hypertension was defined as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, or self-reported use of antihypertensive medication. Dyslipidemia was defined as an elevation of total cholesterol (TC) ≥ 6.1 mmol/L and/or of triacylglycerol (TG) ≥ 2.26 mmol/L, or an elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 4.14 mmol/L or a decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 1.0 mmol/L, according to the American National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Panel III) [11]. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was considered to be present if the patient had an ischemic history or ECG abnormality. Cerebral vascular disease (CVD) was diagnosed based on history of ischemic attack or strokes. As a method to diagnose peripheral atherosclerosis (PA), ultrasonography of carotid or lower limb arteries was performed to detect the presence of thickening or plaque on the wall of those blood vessels. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) was diagnosed by electromyogram (EMG). Diabetic nephropathy (DN) was indicated by both microalbuminuria (24 h urinary albumin excretion between 30 and 300 mg) and macroalbuminuria (>300 mg in at least two of three measurements). Hyperuricemia/gout was indicated by explicit history or measurements obtained from plasma uric acid (Ua) assay. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by radionuclide renal dynamic imaging, after intravenous injection of 99mTc-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA). The 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging (modified Gate’s method) was measured by a Siemens Signature SPECT (General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA). Anemia was defined according to Chinese anemia sex-based criteria, which is hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of <12 g/dL for men and <11 g/dL for women. In addition, the patients with anemia were further subdivided into two groups: mild anemia (Hb ≥ 9 g/dL) and moderate and severe anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL).

2.3. Laboratory Assays

Fasting blood samples were drawn before breakfast on the second day of hospitalization for measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, glycated albumin (GA), C-peptide, Ua, TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C. The 2 h postprandial glucose (2 h PG) levels were drawn after a mixed meal. The plasma glucose concentration was measured using a glucose oxidase method (Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer; Beckman Coulter, USA). Serum lipids and renal function indices were determined by enzymatic procedures using an autoanalyzer (7600-020; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Serum C-peptide was determined by radioimmunoassay (Linco, USA). HbA1c was estimated by high-performance liquid chromatography using the HLC-723G7 analyzer (Tosoh Corporation, Japan). GA was measured by a liquid enzymatic assay kit (Lucica GA-L; Asahi Kasei Pharma, Japan). The 24 h urinary albumin concentration was determined by nephelometry using an N antiserum to Human Albumin Assay and BN II analyzer (Dade-Behring, USA). Hb was measured using an automated blood analyzer (XE-5000; Sysmex Corp., Japan).

2.4. Detection of DR

Fundus photographic imaging was carried out by following a standardized protocol. Both eyes of each participant were photographed with a 45-degree 6.3-megapixel digital nonmydriatic camera (Canon CR6-45NM, Lake Success, NY, USA). According to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Disease Severity Scales [12], the severity of DR was treated as an ordinal variable: 0: no findings of diabetic retinopathy (NDR); 1: nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR, including mild, moderate, and severe NPDR); and 2: proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Patients whose fundus diseases were of unequal severity in both eyes were staged according to the more severe one. NPDR and PDR were, respectively, considered as the early and late stage of DR; thus, in this analysis the two categories were combined as a single group (DR group) for both 2-group comparison and logistic regression.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Numerical variables of normal distribution were expressed as mean ± SD, while those of nonnormal distribution were expressed as median (quartile). One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed to compare means of normally distributed variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate nonnormally distributed variables. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was also used to examine the association of clinical variables with DR. Chi-square (χ2) test was used to analyze categorical variables. Trend χ2 test was used to compare proportions among groups. The significance level for the above statistical analyses was set as α = 0.05, and a P value < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered as statistically significant.

In this study, binary logistic regression was primarily used to estimate the association of independent factors and DR by Wald and P value, for which <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The ability of each independent factor to relate to DR was determined by partial regression coefficient (B) and odds ratio (OR = EXP(B)), along with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). OR above 1 represented positive correlation, and OR below 1 represented negative correlation.

3. Results

3.1. Subjects’ Clinical Characteristics and Comorbidities

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria mentioned above, a total of 2009 T2DM patients were included in this analysis. There were 1145 (57%) males and 864 (43%) females, with mean age of 59.69 ± 12.28 years and diabetic duration of 8.05 ± 6.71 years. Of all the subjects, 597 (29.7%) were diagnosed with DR, of which 548 (27.3%) had NPDR and 49 (2.4%) had PDR. Comparisons between the two groups (NDR versus DR) revealed a significantly higher prevalence of anemia, hypertension, DN, DPN, and PA in the DR group. In contrast, no differences were found between the two groups for dyslipidemia, CHD, CVD, and hyperuricemia/gout. PA, DN, DPN, hypertension, and anemia were positively correlated with DR (Table 1).


2009 (100)1412 (100)597 (100)
Male1145 (57)832 (58.9)313 (52.4)0.007−0.060
Female864 (43)580 (41.1)284 (47.6)
Dyslipidemia1503 (74.8)1063 (75.3)440 (73.7)0.564−0.017
Hypertension1166 (58)778 (55.1)388 (65)0.0000.092
Anemia164 (8.2)86 (6.1)78 (13.1)0.0000.116
CHD122 (6.1)90 (6.4)32 (5.4)0.385−0.019
CVD108 (5.4)78 (5.5)30 (5.0)0.650−0.100
PA1334 (66.4)912 (64.6)422 (70.7)0.0080.059
DN497 (24.7)283 (20.0)214 (35.8)0.0000.167
DPN866 (43.1)541 (38.3)325 (54.4)0.0000.149
208 (10.4)151 (10.7)57 (9.5)0.441−0.017

* Univariate relation of DR with clinical comorbidities was determined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
3.2. Comparisons of Clinical Parameters

Comparisons of clinical parameters according to the retinopathy status are shown in Table 2. Patients with DR were found to have significantly longer duration of diabetes and elevated SBP and DBP, but significantly lower levels of Hb and GFR. No differences were observed in serum lipids, including TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C. Patients with DR (NPDR or PDR) tended to have higher HbA1c and GA levels, which reflected the status of blood glucose control, while C-peptide levels were significantly lower than those of the NDR group. The duration of diabetes, SBP, DBP, HbA1c, and GA levels were found to be positively correlated with DR; Hb, HDL, GFR, C-peptide, and GFR were negatively correlated.


Age, years59.69 ± 12.2859.89 ± 12.8159.21 ± 10.930.227−0.032
Duration, years8.05 ± 6.716.99 ± 6.2910.58 ± 6.98 <0.0010.255
BMI, kg/m224.77 ± 3.5124.84 ± 3.5324.61 ± 3.450.174−0.028
SBP, mmHg131.40 ± 17.39129.53 ± 16.55135.79 ± 18.51<0.0010.164
DBP, mmHg79.61 ± 9.6879.18 ± 9.4880.62 ± 10.080.0020.068
Hb, g/L135 (125~145)136 (126~146)132 (122~143)<0.001−0.105
TC, mmol/L4.75 ± 1.134.72 ± 1.104.81 ± 1.200.1490.034
TG, mmol/L1.86 ± 1.651.88 ± 1.761.79 ± 1.360.269−0.035
HDL-C, mmol/L1.11 ± 0.321.10 ± 0.321.13 ± 0.310.0560.052
LDL-C, mmol/L3.22 ± 1.03.21 ± 0.983.25 ± 1.030.5150.008
FPG, mmol/L8.32 ± 2.848.29 ± 2.738.39 ± 3.090.480−0.007
2 hPG, mmol/L14.06 ± 4.6714.05 ± 4.6414.09 ± 4.760.8270.005
HbA1c, %8.7 (7.2~10.5)8.5 (7.1~10.4)9.1 (7.5~10.7)0.0030.068
GA, %24 (19~30)24 (19~30)25 (20~31)<0.0010.09
C-peptide, ng/mL1.59 (1.0~2.28)1.70 (1.11~2.41)1.35 (0.85~2.04)<0.001−0.157
IMT, mm0.94 ± 0.710.92 ± 0.620.99 ± 0.870.0470.049
24 h-urinary albumin, mg10.92 (5.72~30.62)9.37 (5.32~23.15)18.66 (7.25~77.60)<0.0010.213
GFR, mL/min92.47 ± 25.2893.60 ± 25.1789.66 ± 25.370.003−0.069

Data are mean ± SD or mean (quartile).
* Univariate relation of DR with clinical parameters were determined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
, .
3.3. Regression Analyses of DR

Age, gender, duration of diabetes, BMI, dyslipidemia, HbA1c, SBP, DBP, C-peptide, anemia, DN, DPN, and PA were entered into a logistic regression model. The results of the logistic regression analyses are displayed in Table 3. There were strong significant associations between the development of DR and duration (OR = 1.083, 95% CI 1.061–1.105), SBP (OR = 1.013, 95% CI 1.006–1.021), presence of DN (OR = 1.614, 95% CI 1.217–2.142), presence of anemia (OR = 1.857, 95% CI 1.225–2.815), and presence of PA (OR = 1.589, 95% CI 1.161–2.176). C-peptide (OR = 0.761, 95% CI 0.669–0.867) was negatively associated with DR.

Items S.E.Wald OR95% CI of OR
Lower boundaryUpper boundary


3.4. Relationship between Each Related Factor and the Severity of DR

The relationship between each independent factor associated with DR and the severity of retinopathy was examined. The prevalence of NPDR and PDR was much higher in patients with longer duration of diabetes, higher level of SBP, increased severity of DN, more severe anemia, presence of PA, and lower serum C-peptide quartile (all P < 0.01) (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

The results of this clinic-based study suggest that independent factors associated with DR in Chinese patients include duration of diabetes, SBP, C-peptide, DN, PA, and anemia. In particular, the severity of DR was found to be increased in conditions of lower C-peptide levels and elevated levels of the other independent factors.

In our study, the duration of diabetes was found to be significantly higher in patients with DR than in those without, and the longer the duration of diabetes the higher the prevalence of retinopathy. Our findings agree with those from previously published studies in populations of other ethnic groups that also identified duration of diabetes to be an independent risk factor for retinopathy [1315]. It is presumed that duration of diabetes reflects total glycemic control and risk factor exposure over time.

HbA1c and GA were found to be significantly higher in DR patients from our Chinese study population. However, they did not retain significance in the final logistic regression analysis. This was different from the results of previous studies [4, 1619]. This difference may be a result of most of the patients in our study having been admitted to the hospital to treat severely poor glycemic control, and the long-term control of blood glucose might not have been reflected through the levels of HbA1c and GA detected at admission. The large United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (known as the UKPDS) found that every 1% decrease in HbA1c was accompanied by a 24% reduction in the risk of developing DR [20]. Therefore, glycemic control in patients with T2DM was confirmed as very important to lowering a patient’s risk for developing DR.

The current study in Chinese patients showed that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in subjects with DR than in those without, and the study found that SBP was positively associated with DR. The UKPDS also found that the incidence of retinopathy was associated with SBP in their largely Caucasian population; specifically, the relative risk for DR was found in the UKPDS to be 1.5 for systolic pressures between 125 and 139 mmHg and 2.8 for systolic pressures higher than 140 mmHg [15]. It is known that DR can be affected by the hemodynamic changes induced by hypertension, such as impaired autoregulation and hyperperfusion [21]. In addition, hypertension independent of hyperglycemia is known to upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in retinal endothelial cells and ocular fluids, which can promote DR [22].

Dyslipidemia was not shown in our study population to be associated with retinopathy, which was consistent with the reported results from some of the other studies in the literature [6, 23]. However, this was different from the results of two large prospective studies, the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study [24] and the Wisconsin Epidemiological study [25]. Both of these found a statistically significant association between elevated serum total cholesterol and LDL-C cholesterol and the severity of retinal hard exudation in patients with DR. Furthermore, subsequent evidence proved the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in ameliorating DR progression [26, 27]. Regression analyses in our study did not find any influence of dyslipidemia on DR, likely due to the poorly controlled lipid levels upon admission of our patients, on which our data was based.

Albuminuria excretion was significantly higher in our patient population with DR than in those without, and GFR was negatively correlated to DR. Further analysis showed that DN was observed to be an independent risk factor for the development of DR, with odds of 1.614 times. Moreover, the severity of DR in patients with T2DM appeared to be aggravated with an increasing severity of DN. Higher risk of concomitant DR might be predicted in patients with DN or renal dysfunction. This could be explained by the fact that both nephropathy and retinopathy are related to endothelial dysfunction-mediated microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). A number of previous studies have published evidence to support the suggestion that DR and DN progress in a parallel manner; thus, the presence of one is believed to predict the development of the other [10, 28, 29]. Therefore, all patients with DN should be regarded as a high-risk group for their increased risk of developing and the progression of DR, and close monitoring for DR is recommended to prevent irreversible visual loss.

C-peptide was negatively correlated with DR in our study, indicating it as a protective factor against DR. Our results were consistent with a previous study that also found reduced serum C-peptide to be associated with a higher prevalence of retinopathy in T2DM [23]. Considering the numerous studies that have been conducted on the structure, membrane binding, and biological functions of C-peptide, it seems likely that this protein may indeed play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of DM and its associated complications [30]. Even slightly preserved function of the insulin-producing cells has been shown to have beneficial effects on glucose disposal and metabolic control, thereby decreasing the occurrence of subsequent microvascular complications [31]. C-peptide has also been proven to be an active peptide hormone with potentially important physiological effects [3235]. For example, C-peptide can stimulate Na+-K+-ATPase, endothelial nitric oxide synthase activities [3537], and nuclear factor-κB activation of endothelial cells, all of which are enzyme systems of significant benefit in the prevention and treatment of DR. Furthermore, an experimental study has shown that C-peptide is involved in regulating extracellular matrix (ECM) protein composition, which is one of the characteristic features of DR [38].

In agreement with findings of previous studies [39, 40], we also identified a close relationship of PA and DR in diabetic patients. Atherosclerotic changes in the carotid or lower limb arteries generally reflect systemic atherosclerosis. In addition, vascular endomembrane damage and endothelial dysfunction are considered to be the common initial factors and pathological mechanisms of both macro- and microvascular complications [41].

Anemia was found in our study to be another risk factor of DR in Chinese patients, perhaps because of anemia-induced retinal hypoxia. Individuals with anemia were 1.857 times more likely to develop DR than individuals without anemia. Moreover, the prevalence of PDR was significantly increased in patients with moderate-severe anemia than those with absolutely no detectable anemia. These results are consistent with those reported in the ETDRS, in which low hematocrit was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of high-risk PDR and visual impairment [7]. Another large cross-sectional study showed that the odds ratio of having any retinopathy was twofold higher for individuals with an Hb level of <12 g/dL, as compared with those having an Hb level ≥12 g/dL. In addition, DR patients with low hemoglobin levels had over fivefold increased risk of severe retinopathy, as compared to those with higher hemoglobin levels [42]. These results suggested that subjects with low Hb levels tended to have an increased risk of retinopathy, especially that of the severe form. Other studies have corroborated this finding and have also found evidence of improvement in the DR status following correction of anemia [4345]. Although much attention has been given to anemia in diabetes in recent years, particularly as it relates to kidney disease [4650], little attention has been given to low Hb levels as a risk factor for the development or worsening of DR.

There were several limitations to the present study that should be noted here, as they may affect the generalization of our findings. Because this was a cross-sectional study, the results do not provide definite information on a cause-and-effect relationship. In addition, because our study population was composed solely of patients from a single center, there was unavoidable bias of selection, information, and confounding variables. Prospective and larger studies are required to overcome these limitations.


The authers would like to express their appreciation to the study participants and research associates who made it possible to complete this research project. This work was funded by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30670989) and the National 973 Program (no. 2011CB504001).


  1. R. Khandekar and A. J. Mohammed, “Visual disabilities among diabetics in Oman,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 836–841, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. E. M. Kohner, S. J. Aldington, I. M. Stratton et al., “United kingdom prospective diabetes study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 297–303, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, S. E. Moss, and K. J. Cruickshanks, “The wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy: XVII. The 14- year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 105, no. 10, pp. 1801–1815, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. I. M. Stratton, E. M. Kohner, S. J. Aldington et al., “UKPDS 50: risk factors for incidence and progression of retinopathy in Type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis,” Diabetologia, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 156–163, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. M. Stratton, A. I. Adler, H. A. W. Neil et al., “Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7258, pp. 405–412, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. J. Tapp, J. E. Shaw, C. A. Harper et al., “The prevalence of and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian population,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1731–1737, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. D. Davis, M. R. Fisher, R. E. Gangnon et al., “Risk factors for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and severe visual loss: early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report 18,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 233–252, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. K. Dowse, A. R. G. Humphrey, V. R. Collins et al., “Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in the multiethnic population of Mauritius,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 448–457, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. I. Harris, R. Klein, C. C. Cowie, M. Rowland, and D. D. Byrd-Holt, “Is the risk of diabetic retinopathy greater in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites with type 2 diabetes? A U.S. population study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1230–1235, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. R. Manaviat, M. Afkhami, and M. R. Shoja, “Retinopathy and microalbuminuria in type II diabetic patients,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 4, article no. 9, pp. 1–4, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. I. Cleeman, “Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III),” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 19, pp. 2486–2497, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  12. C. P. Wilkinson, F. L. Ferris, R. E. Klein et al., “Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales,” Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1677–1682, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Bamashmus, A. Gunaid, and R. Khandekar, “Diabetic retinopathy, visual impairment and ocular status among patients with diabetes mellitus in Yemen: a hospital-based study,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 293–298, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. K. Rani, R. Raman, A. Chandrakantan, S. S. Pal, G. M. Perumal, and T. Sharma, “Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in self-reported rural population with diabetes,” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Pradeepa, B. Anitha, V. Mohan, A. Ganesan, and M. Rema, “Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in a South Indian type 2 diabetic population—the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES) eye study 4,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 536–542, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Esteves, C. M. da Rosa, C. K. Kramer, L. E. Osowski, S. Milano, and L. H. Canani, “Absence of diabetic retinopathy in a patient who has had diabetes mellitus for 69 years, and inadequate glycemic control: case presentation,” Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 13, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, S. E. Moss, and K. J. Cruickshanks, “The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy: XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1217–1228, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. Turner, “Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34),” Lancet, vol. 352, no. 9131, pp. 854–865, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. C. Looker, J. Krakoff, W. C. Knowler, P. H. Bennett, R. Klein, and R. L. Hanson, “Longitudinal studies of incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy assessed by retinal photography in Pima Indians,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 320–326, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. M. Molyneaux, M. I. Constantino, M. McGill, R. Zilkens, and D. K. Yue, “Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Fuchsjäger-Mayrl, K. Polak, A. Luksch et al., “Retinal blood flow and systemic blood pressure in healthy young subjects,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 239, no. 9, pp. 673–677, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. I. Suzuma, Y. Hata, A. Clermont et al., “Cyclic stretch and hypertension induce retinal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: potential mechanisms for exacerbation of diabetic retinopathy by hypertension,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 444–454, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  23. W. Zheng, “Factor analysis of diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 244–252, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. L. Ferris, E. Y. Chew, and B. J. Hoogwerf, “Serum lipids and diabetic retinopathy,” Diabetes Care, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1291–1293, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  25. B. E. K. Klein, S. E. Moss, R. Klein, and T. S. Surawicz, “The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy XIII. Relationship of serum cholesterol to retinopathy and hard exudate,” Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1261–1265, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. Y. Chew, W. T. Ambrosius, M. D. Davis et al., “Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 3, pp. 233–244, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Keech, P. Mitchell, P. Summanen et al., “Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9600, pp. 1687–1697, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Girach and L. Vignati, “Diabetic microvascular complications-can the presence of one predict the development of another?” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 228–237, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. C. Boelter, J. L. Gross, L. H. Canani et al., “Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is associated with microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1033–1039, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  30. C. E. Hills and N. J. Brunskill, “Cellular and physiological effects of C-peptide,” Clinical Science, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 565–574, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Wilhelm, P. Kann, and A. Pfützner, “Influence of C-peptide on glucose utilisation,” Experimental Diabetes Research, vol. 2008, Article ID 769483, 3 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Johansson, K. Ekberg, J. Shafqat et al., “Molecular effects of proinsulin C-peptide,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 295, no. 5, pp. 1035–1040, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. E. Hills, N. J. Brunskill, and P. E. Squires, “C-peptide as a therapeutic tool in diabetic nephropathy,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 389–397, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. S. Mughal, J. L. Scragg, P. Lister et al., “Cellular mechanisms by which proinsulin C-peptide prevents insulin-induced neointima formation in human saphenous vein,” Diabetologia, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1761–1771, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Wahren, K. Ekberg, J. Johansson et al., “Role of C-peptide in human physiology,” American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 278, no. 5, pp. E759–E768, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. A. Cotter, K. Ekberg, J. Wahren, and N. E. Cameron, “Effects of proinsulin C-peptide in experimental diabetic neuropathy: vascular actions and modulation by nitric oxide synthase inhibition,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1812–1817, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  37. P. Luppi, V. Cifarelli, H. Tse, J. Piganelli, and M. Trucco, “Human C-peptide antagonises high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction through the nuclear factor-κB pathway,” Diabetologia, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1534–1543, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Chakrabarti, Z. Ali Khan, M. Cukiernik, and W. Zhang, “C-peptide and retinal microangiopathy in diabetes,” Experimental Diabesity Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Kawamoto, H. Tomita, Y. Oka, and N. Ohtsuka, “Association between risk factors and carotid enlargement,” Internal Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 503–509, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Klein, A. R. Sharrett, B. E. K. Klein et al., “The association of atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors, and retinopathy in adults with diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1225–1234, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. I. Adler, I. M. Stratton, H. A. W. Neil et al., “Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7258, pp. 412–419, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. Q. Qiao, S. Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, and E. Läärä, “The relationship between hemoglobin levels and diabetic retinopathy,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. K. Rani, R. Raman, S. R. Rachepalli et al., “Anemia and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Association of Physicians of India, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 91–94, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  44. V. Ajoy Mohan, S. Nithyanandam, and J. Idiculla, “Microalbuminuria and low hemoglobin as risk factors for the occurrence and increasing severity of diabetic retinopathy,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 207–210, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. Singh, V. Gupta, A. Gupta, and A. Bhansali, “Spontaneous closure of microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy with treatment of co-existing anaemia,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 248–249, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. J. Craig, J. D. Williams, S. G. Riley et al., “Anemia and diabetes in the absence of nephropathy,” Diabetes Care, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1118–1123, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. C. Thomas, R. J. MacIsaac, C. Tsalamandris et al., “Anemia in patients with Type 1 diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 4359–4363, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. C. Thomas, R. J. MacIsaac, C. Tsalamandris, D. Power, and G. Jerums, “Unrecognized anemia in patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional survey,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1164–1169, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Thomas and M. Rampersad, “Anaemia in diabetes,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. S13–S17, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Cusick, E. Y. Chew, B. Hoogwerf et al., “Risk factors for renal replacement therapy in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report No. 26,” Kidney International, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1173–1179, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Bin-Bin He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2375 Views | 1062 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.