Research Article

Body Fat Equations and Electrical Bioimpedance Values in Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Eutrophic and Overweight Adolescents

Table 1

Body fat and fat-free mass anthropometric equations.

ReferenceSexEquationEquation number

Masc.a = 1.1533 – 0.0643 [log4 skinfold thicknesses]
Durnin and Rahaman (1967) [7]Fem.a = 1.1369 – 0.0598 [log4 skinfold thicknesses]
% BF = [(4.95/ ) – 4.50] 100(1)
Masc.b = 1.1620 – 0.063 [log4 skinfold thicknesses]
Durnin and Womersley (1974) [8]Fem.b = 1.1549 – 0.0678 [log4 skinfold thicknesses]
% BF = [(4.95/ ) – 4.50] 100

Masc.% BF = 1.35 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] – 0.012
Boileau et al. (1985) [9]     [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)]2 – 4.4(2)
Fem.% BF = 1.35 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] – 0.012
     [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)]2 – 2.4

Masc.
Fem.
% BF = 0.735 [triceps (mm) + calf (mm)] + 1.0
% BF = 0.610 [triceps (mm) + calf (mm)] + 5.1
(3)
Masc.c% BF = 1.21 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] – 0.008
Slaughter et al. (1988) [10]     [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)]2 +   
Fem.c% BF = 1.33 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] – 0.013 (4)
     [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)]2 – 2.5
Masc.d
Fem.d
% BF = 0.783 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] + 1.6
% BF = 0.546 [triceps (mm) + subscapular (mm)] + 9.7

Weststrate and Deurenberg (1989) [11]Masc.
Fem.
% BF =   
% BF =
(5)

Masc.FFM = 0.646 (Wt) – 0.116 [lateral calf (mm)] – 0.375
Guo et al. (1989) [12]     [midaxillary (mm)] + 0.475 [arm muscle
    circumference (cm)] + 0.156 (Ht2/ ) – 2.932
(6)
Fem.FFM = 0.682 (Wt) – 0.185 [lateral calf (mm)] – 0.244
  [triceps (mm)] – 0.202 [subscapular (mm)] + 0.182 (Ht2/ ) + 4.338

Deurenberg et al. (1990) [13]Masc.
Fem.
% BF = 18.88 [log (4 skinfold thicknesses)] – 15.58
% BF = 39.02 [log (4 skinfold thicknesses)] – 43.49
(7)

Deurenberg et al. (1991) [14] Masc./Fem.e
Masc. /Fem.f
% BF = 1.51 (BMI) – 0.70 ( ) – 3.6 ( ) + 1.4
% BF = 1.2 (BMI) + 0.23 ( ) – 10.8 ( ) −5.4
(8)

Houtkooper et al. (1992) [15]Masc./Fem.FFM = 0.61 (Ht2/ ) + 0.25 (Wt) + 1.31(9)

Ellis (1997) [16] and Ellis et al. (1997) [17]Masc.g
Masc.h
Fem.g
Fem.h
= 0.534 (Wt) – 1.59 ( ) + 3.03
= 0.594 (Wt) – 0.381 (Ht) + 36.0
= 0.642 (Wt) – 0.120 (Ht) – 0.606 ( ) + 8.98
= 0.653 (Wt) – 0.163 (Ht) – 0.298 ( ) + 10.7
(10)

aEquation for adolescents aged 15-16 years; bequation for adolescents aged 17-18 years; c for a sum of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses <35 mm; dfor a sum of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses >35 mm; eequation for adolescents aged ≤15 years; fequation for adolescents aged ≥16 years; gequations for white individuals; hequations for black individuals; log4 skinfold thicknesses = logarithm sum of bicipital, tricipital, suprailiacal, subscapular skinfold thicknesses (mm); for boys aged 2–18 y: = and for girls aged 11–18 y: = ; Eq: equation; Fem: feminine sex; Masc.: masculine sex; : density (g/L); % BF: percentage of body fat; FFM: fat free mass (kg), : resistance (Ω); : age (years); : fat (kg); BMI: body mass index (kg/m2); : sex (masculine = 1 and feminine = 0); Wt: body weight (kg); Ht: height (cm); : intercept in males varies for maturation level and racial group as follows: for black males: prepubescent = − 3.5; pubescent = − 5.2; postpubescent and adult = − 6.8. For white males: prepubescent = − 1.7; pubescent = − 3.4; postpubescent and adult = − 5.5.