Frequency-matched case-control study Prognostic study, Level II
311 RCR cases versus 993 controls
(53–77)
BMI
OR: 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1–2.2) for males and 2.4 (1.4–4.2) for females with BMI ≥ 35. OR: 3.1 (95% CI: 1.3–7.6) for males and 3.5 (1.8–6.9) for females with BMI ≥ 35. Risk directly correlated with the grade of obesity for both men () and women ()
Retrospective case-control, treatment study Level III
5,000 cases of RC disease versus 5,000 controls (BMI calculated in 3,385 of cases (67.7%) and 3,050 (61.0%) of controls)
55 (interquartile range 44–65)
BMI
BMI 25.1–30 (overweight) and RC disease OR: 1.23 (1.10–1.38) BMI 30.1–40 (obese) and RC disease OR: 1.25 (1.09–1.44) BMI > 40 (morbidly obese) no increased risk After adjustment for consultation rate, the effect persisted only in the BMI 25.1–30 (overweight) group OR: 1.15 (1.02–1.31)
Significant association only for patients who are slightly overweight (BMI 25–30) Impossible to differentiate comorbid factors such as diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, and hyperlipidemia
699 workers with no symptoms at baseline. At 36 months: 48 suffered from medial or lateral epicondylitis (6.9%), 34 from lateral epicondylitis (4.9%), 30 from medial epicondylitis (4.3%), and 16 from both
38.1 ± 9.3 (20–66)
BMI
BMI > 30 and lateral epicondylitis: univariate analyses OR: 2.4 (1.2–4.8), multivariate analyses OR: 1.8 (0.8–3.9). No association for medial epicondylitis
Obesity is associated only with lateral epicondylitis
4,783 of the initial 5,871 (81.5%) 67 with lateral epicondylitis (1.3%) and 19 with medial epicondylitis (0.4%)
46.3 ± 9.6 (30–64)
BMI, waist circumference
Only in women WC > 100 cm and medial epicondylitis OR: 2.7 (1.2–6.0) BMI > 30 kg/m2 and medial epicondylitis OR: 1.9 (1.0–2.7) No association for lateral epicondylitis
123 (65.4%) of the overweight/obese subjects had a diagnosis of tendinitis compared to 65 (34.6%) normal subjects. BMI > 25 and tendinitis OR: 1.923 (1.39–2.66)
Being overweight or obese significantly increased the chances of tendinitis
298 cases (127 men, 171 women) asymptomatic Achilles tendinopathy in 17 men (13%) and 8 women (5%) ().
Men 38.3 ± 12.2 Women 36.5 ± 10.5
Fat distribution (android/gynoid fat mass ratio and upper body/lower body fat mass ratio) determined using WC, WHR, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Men with Achilles tendinopathy had greater WHR (0.926 ± 0.091, 0.875 ± 0.065, ), higher android/gynoid fat mass ratio (0.616 ± 0.186, 0.519 ± 0.142, ), and higher upper body/lower body fat mass ratio (2.346 ± 0.630, 2.022 ± 0.467, ). Women with tendinopathy had less total fat (17196 ± 3173 g, 21626 ± 7882 g, ), trunk fat (7367 ± 1662 g, 10087 ± 4152 g, ), and android fat (1117 ± 324 g, 1616 ± 811 g, ). They had lower central/peripheral fat mass ratios (0.711 ± 0.321 g, 0.922 ± 0.194 g, ) than women with normal tendons
Men with Achilles tendinopathy had a central fat distribution. Women had a peripheral fat distribution.
OR: 2.60, 95% CI = 1.87–3.61; 3.81, 95% CI = 2.57–5.63; 3.77, 95% CI = 2.24–6.34; 6.56, 95% CI = 3.18–13.55 For BMI: 25.0–29.9, 30.0–34.9, 35.0–39.9, and >40.0, respectively
BMI plays a role in the development of Achilles tendinopathy