Skeleton and Glucose Metabolism: A Bone-Pancreas Loop

Faienza, Maria Felicia; Luce, Vincenza; Ventura, Annamaria; Colaianni, Graziana; Colucci, Silvia; Cavallo, Luciano; Grano, Maria; Brunetti, Giacomina

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/758148

International Journal of Endocrinology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Endocrine Role of the Skeleton

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 758148 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/758148

Skeleton and Glucose Metabolism: A Bone-Pancreas Loop

Maria Felicia Faienza,¹Vincenza Luce,¹Annamaria Ventura,¹Graziana Colaianni,²Silvia Colucci,²Luciano Cavallo,¹Maria Grano,²and Giacomina Brunetti²

Academic Editor: Andrea Del Fattore

Received06 Aug 2014

Revised11 Nov 2014

Accepted02 Dec 2014

Published19 Mar 2015

Abstract

Bone has been considered a structure essential for mobility, calcium homeostasis, and hematopoietic function. Recent advances in bone biology have highlighted the importance of skeleton as an endocrine organ which regulates some metabolic pathways, in particular, insulin signaling and glucose tolerance. This review will point out the role of bone as an endocrine “gland” and, specifically, of bone-specific proteins, as the osteocalcin (Ocn), and proteins involved in bone remodeling, as osteoprotegerin, in the regulation of insulin function and glucose metabolism.

1. Introduction

Bone is a dynamic structure that is constantly subject to remodeling by specialized cells, the osteoclasts (OCs), osteoblasts (OBs), and osteocytes. Bone remodeling consists of removal of mineralized bone tissue by OCs, to leave a resorptive cavity filled by the migration of OB precursors which differentiate into mature OBs. Osteocytes regulate both remodeling and mineralization processes and represent the terminal stage of the OB lineage embedded in the bone matrix. Osteocytes are also the source of molecules which control the production and activity of OCs, such as osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) [1].

Recently, bone has emerged as an endocrine “gland,” and some key mediators of this alternative function have been identified.

This review focuses on the role of the skeleton as endocrine organ, its modulation of glucose tolerance by secretion of bone-specific proteins, in particular the osteocalcin (Ocn), and how proteins involved in bone remodeling, like OPG, are associated with impairment of insulin function.

2. The Role of Insulin in Regulating the Functions of Bone Cells

The regulation of glucose metabolism occurs through the interplay of multiple hormones which operate in many target organs. Insulin plays an important role in glucose regulation by promoting glucose uptake in adipose tissue and muscle and by suppressing gluconeogenesis in liver. To perform these functions, insulin binds to its receptor (InsR), a tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocytes, adipocytes, myoblasts, and OBs.

However, deletion of the InsR in muscle, the most important site of glucose uptake, does not affect blood glucose levels, insulin concentration, and glucose tolerance, suggesting that other tissues, like bone, could be involved in glucose regulation [2, 3].

Insulin has been demonstrated to be an osteogenic hormone both in vitro and in vivo. OBs express abundant insulin receptors and respond to insulin treatment [4–6] by increasing cell proliferation [7, 8], collagen synthesis [5, 9–11], and glucose uptake [12, 13]. Mice knocked out for InsR in their OBs have decreased trabecular bone volume due to reduced bone formation and poor numbers of OBs [3, 14]. In addition, these mutant mice show the reduction of OC erosion depth and low serum levels of cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX) which indicate a decline of OC activity. Moreover, the treatment with insulin has been shown to be effective in determining the reversibility of skeletal alterations of rodent model with type 1 diabetes and also favoring the healing of fractures [15–19]. Based on these data, there are emerging studies which regard the skeleton as an important regulator of energy metabolism.

3. Osteocalcin and Glucose Metabolism: The Bone-Pancreas Loop

Recent investigations, particularly from the Karsenty group, have identified a crucial role for the Ocn in regulating insulin metabolism in a hormonal way [14]. Ocn is the major noncollagen protein secreted by the OBs and it is stored in the extracellular matrix of bone. Before its secretion, Ocn is carboxylated at the level of three Gla residues. This process of carboxylation confers high-affinity binding to hydroxyapatite, the mineral present in bone, and the attachment of carboxylated Ocn to the bone matrix [20]. Instead, when Ocn is uncarboxylated, its binding to hydroxyapatite is reduced, promoting the passage of Ocn into circulation. The involvement of undercarboxylated form of Ocn in a bone-pancreas loop has been demonstrated by previous studies. Ocn-deficient mice show few β cells, great fat mass, and decreased insulin sensitivity [21]. Conversely, the subcutaneous infusion of recombinant Ocn into wild-type mice enhances glucose tolerance and improves insulin sensitivity [22].

The decarboxylation of Ocn is dependent on bone resorption: insulin signaling in OBs favors the differentiation of OCs and the formation of resorption lacunae by inhibiting the expression of OPG [14]. The low pH present within these lacunae promotes the decarboxylation of Ocn and consequently its activation [14] (Figure 1). Conversely, a tyrosine phosphatase produced by Esp (Ptprv) gene blocks Ocn decarboxylation and decreases serum levels of active form of Ocn [21]. The human ortholog of Esp (OST-PTP, also called osteotesticular protein tyrosine phosphatase) is not active in humans but recent studies have shown that there are additional tyrosine phosphatases, such as TC-PTP1, expressed in OBs [21–24]. These phosphatases can regulate Ocn activity and glucose homeostasis by acting on the insulin signaling pathway in the OBs [21, 23, 24].

3.1. Uncarboxylated Osteocalcin Functions

The regulation of systemic glucose metabolism and insulin resistance by Ocn occurs in a hormonal manner [25].

Firstly, Ocn stimulates insulin secretion by β-cells both directly [26, 27] and indirectly promoting the secretion of gut glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) [28] (Figure 1). The effects of Ocn on activating ERK and insulin secretion are mediated by Ocn receptor, an orphan receptor belonging to the C family of GPCRs, highly expressed in the mouse pancreatic β-cell line [29]. The Ocn-GPRC6A network has strong physiological effects in the mouse, but the clinical relevance of this endocrine pathway in humans is less certain. Up till now, no mutations or polymorphisms of Osteocalcin or GPRC6A genes have been reported in humans [27]. Secondly, Ocn promotes β-cell proliferation by increasing Ccnd2 and Cdk4 expression in β-cells [22]. Thirdly, Ocn increases insulin sensitivity in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue (Figure 1) by upregulation of adiponectin gene expression in adipocytes [21].

InsR signaling in OBs has a double and positive action on Ocn. On one side, InsR induces Osteocalcin gene expression in OBs by blocking the negative activity of the nuclear factor Twist2 on Runx2, the master gene of OB differentiation and Ocn expression [30]. Furthermore, InsR signal decreases the ability of FOXO1 to activate the OPG promoter (Figure 1), thus reducing the secretion of this inhibitor of OC function by OBs [31].

3.2. Clinical Relevance of Osteocalcin Glucose Regulation

A number of studies have established that numerous aspects of Ocn biology are similar in rodents and humans. There are several data indicating that serum levels of uncarboxylated Ocn negatively correlate with insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes, or markers of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) [32–35]. Interestingly, important weight loss causes a decrease of insulin resistance as well as an increase in Ocn levels in obese children [36], and acute aerobic exercise could increase serum uncarboxylated Ocn in obese subjects [37]. Furthermore, serum Ocn has also been positively correlated with improved glucose control in subjects with type 2 diabetes [38]. Women with gestational diabetes show high Ocn levels which correlate with insulin secretion parameters and return to normal values postpartum [39]. This raising of serum Ocn levels could represent an adaptive process to counteract glucose intolerance during gestational diabetes.

4. Osteoprotegerin

OPG is a soluble glycoprotein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily which decreases bone resorption by inhibiting the differentiation and activation of OCs [40]. It acts as a decoy soluble receptor for RANKL, thus preventing RANKL binding with its receptor RANK on OCs, thus inhibiting osteoclastogenesis [41]. RANKL/RANK/OPG system mediates important and complex relations between the vascular, skeletal, and immune systems [42, 43]. OPG is mainly secreted by bone but it is produced also by different tissues, including endothelial and smooth muscle cells [43]. OPG improves endothelial cells survival but it may induce endothelial inflammation and proliferation of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, thus promoting atherogenesis. OPG knockout mice show osteoporosis and vascular calcification, reintroducing the hypothesis that metabolic bone diseases and vascular diseases, for example, arterial calcification, share common pathways [44, 45]. OPG administration prevents calcification induced by Warfarin or high doses of vitamin D in rats, but the effects of OPG in humans are different from those in rodents [46]. In humans, high OPG levels have been found in patients with type 2 diabetes, coronary artery diseases, hypothyroidism, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity, as well as in aging men [47–51]. A population-based study has demonstrated that high serum OPG represents an independent risk factor for the progression of atherosclerosis, as well as of vascular mortality [52]. On the other hand, results of experimental studies suggest that OPG has also vasoprotective properties through reduction of vascular calcification [53]. Recent data have indicated a role of OPG as metabolic biomarker [54]. In obese subjects, OPG has been found to be positively associated with insulin resistance [55, 56]. Furthermore, high OPG levels have been associated with risk of metabolic syndrome and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes patients [57].

5. Other Regulators of Bone-Pancreas Loop

5.1. Vitamin D

Vitamin D is recognized as a key regulator of bone and mineral metabolism. Vitamin D signaling is mediated by binding of the physiologically active form 1α,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) to its intracellular receptor (VDR) which, after translocation to the nucleus, binds to vitamin D response elements (VDREs) of target genes involved in different pathways (cell proliferation, differentiation, and immunomodulation) [58].

1,25D3 has an indirect effect on bone formation through intestinal and renal regulation of calcium levels. However, the presence of VDRs in OBs suggests a direct role of vitamin D in bone metabolism, supported by gene expression profiling studies examining mRNA in OBs treated with 1,25D3 [59–62]. Moreover, data from in vitro and in vivo models have shown that 1,25D3 can exert catabolic or anabolic actions on bone, depending on species and/or environmental context, in order to control the plasma calcium homeostasis [63]. In particular, 1,25D3 showed stimulatory effects on human and rat OBs and inhibitory effects on murine OBs. Generally, in condition of negative calcium balance, VDR signaling in OBs enhances bone resorption stimulating the expression of RANKL [64] and suppresses bone mineralization by inducing expression of Ocn and osteopontin [65, 66].

The identification of VDRs in different organs and tissues including the prostate, brain, colon, breast, immune cells, and pancreas underlines the extra skeletal effects of vitamin D [67]. In particular, vitamin D regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin secretion by binding to its VDR in pancreatic β-cells [68]. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects and with a reduced insulin production in type 2 diabetics [69].

The role of vitamin D in regulation of insulin production by pancreatic β-cells is supported by the presence of VDREs in the human InsR gene promoter [70]. Moreover, several studies have shown that polymorphisms of VDR gene may affect insulin release and insulin sensitivity [71, 72]. In addition, pancreatic β-cells express a plasma membrane VDR, which seems to mediate an insulinotropic rapid effect of vitamin D, independent of mRNA transcription and protein translation [73].

5.2. Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP)

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is a 42-amino-acid hormone, secreted from K cells of duodenum and proximal jejunum. The main function of GIP is the stimulation of the postprandial insulin secretion from the pancreatic islets [74]. GIP exerts its effects by binding to the GIP receptor (GIPR) and stimulates insulin secretion by β-cells in a glucose-dependent manner [75]. GIPRs are present on OBs, OCs, osteocytes, and chondrocytes [76, 77] and GIP signaling has an anabolic action on bone. In fact, several studies using in vitro and animal models demonstrated an antiapoptotic and stimulating effect on OBs [76, 78, 79] and a direct antiresorptive activity probably mediated by cAMP. [77]. GIP is designed as a member of the “entero-osseous axis,” responsible for the postprandial reduction of bone resorption [78, 80]. This is supported by a recent study of Nissen et al. showing a reduction of CTX plasma levels after infusion with GIP, both during euglycemia and hyperglycemia [81].

5.3. Adiponectin

Adiponectin is a 28 kDa protein produced by differentiated adipocytes and is abundantly present in plasma [82–84]. The biological actions of adiponectin are mediated through the two adiponectin receptors (AdipoR) 1 and 2 and comprise regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammation, and energy balance [85].

Adiponectin controls glucose homeostasis by enhancing insulin sensitivity and maintaining a functional β-cell mass [86]. In particular, adiponectin stimulates muscle glucose utilization [87, 88] and exerts a cytoprotective and antiapoptotic effect on β-cells [89]. Moreover, adiponectin influences bone metabolism, even if the mechanisms mediating this effect are controversial. In vitro experiments showed that adiponectin promotes proliferation of OBs in human [90] and inhibits osteoclastogenesis, increasing bone mass [91].

Conversely, Shinoda et al. [92] demonstrated that high level of circulating adiponectin represents a risk factor for fractures independent of body composition and BMD [92].

This effect could be the consequence of the stimulation of RANKL and inhibition of OPG expression by adiponectin in OBs [93].

Moreover, a recent study has shown that adiponectin inhibits OB proliferation and induces OB apoptosis in young animals, whereas in older animals it increases the bone mass [94]. Thus, according to this study, adiponectin has opposite influences on bone mass, a local negative action on OBs (inhibition of OB proliferation and induction of OB apoptosis), and an indirect effect through a central signaling that decreases sympathetic tone, leading to increase of bone formation and bone mass [94].

6. Conclusions

Recent advances highlighted the role of the bone in modulating metabolic functions. The identification of Ocn as a hormone that stimulates insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues and insulin secretion by the pancreas has opened the way for new fields of research. Nevertheless, the interactions between bone, pancreas, and probably other organs need to be further explored. There are conflicting results on the effects of antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, on glucose metabolism. Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduce circulating levels of total Ocn and in particular of the undercarboxylated, active form. However, although in mouse models the suppression of bone turnover with antiresorptive drugs determines important effects on fasting glucose, weight, and diabetes incidence, randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that the reduction of bone turnover and low levels of undercarboxylated Ocn are not involved in the regulation of insulin sensitivity in humans. Thus, patients receiving such osteoporosis treatments would not be at risk of impaired glucose metabolism or diabetes.

These observations suggest that the bone pancreas loop is more complex than currently known and additional studies will be necessary to evaluate the impact of the connection between the skeleton and metabolism in humans.

Development of new drugs that simultaneously target the skeleton, the glucose metabolism, and the adipose tissue are certain to be considered a future perspective.

Insulin signaling in OBs decreases the expression of OPG, inhibiting FOXO1, and induces Ocn expression, blocking the negative activity of Twist2 on Runx2. Reduction of OPG favors the differentiation of OCs and the low pH of resorption lacunae promotes the decarboxylation of Ocn and consequently its activation. The undercarboxylated Ocn was released into the circulation and stimulates β-cells insulin secretion both directly and indirectly by promoting the secretion of gut GLP-1. Moreover, active Ocn increases insulin sensitivity in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

G. Brunetti, A. Di Benedetto, and G. Mori, “Bone remodeling,” in Imaging of Prosthetic Joints—A Combined Radiological and Clinical Perspective, C. Albanese and C. Faletti, Eds., pp. 27–37, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Brüning, M. D. Michael, J. N. Winnay et al., “A muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibits features of the metabolic syndrome of NIDDM without altering glucose tolerance,” Molecular Cell, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 559–569, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Fulzele, R. C. Riddle, D. J. DiGirolamo et al., “Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Levy, E. Murray, S. Manolagas, and J. M. Olefsky, “Demonstration of insulin receptors and modulation of alkaline phosphatase activity by insulin in rat osteoblastic cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 1786–1792, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Pun, P. Lau, and P. W. M. Ho, “The characterization, regulation, and function of insulin receptors on osteoblast-like clonal osteosarcoma cell line,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 853–862, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
D. M. Thomas, D. K. Hards, S. D. Rogers, K. W. Ng, and J. D. Best, “Insulin receptor expression in bone,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1312–1320, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Hashizume and M. Yamaguchi, “Stimulatory effect of β-alanyl-L-histidinato zinc on cell proliferation is dependent on protein synthesis in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Wergedal and D. J. Baylink, “Characterization of cells isolated and cultured from human bone,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Canalis, J. W. Dietrich, D. M. Maina, and L. G. Raisz, “Hormonal control of bone collagen synthesis in vitro. Effects of insulin and glucagon,” Endocrinology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 668–674, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Rosen and R. A. Luben, “Multiple hormonal mechanisms for the control of collagen synthesis in an osteoblast-like cell line, MMB-1,” Endocrinology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 992–999, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Kream, M. D. Smith, E. Canalis, and L. G. Raisz, “Characterization of the effect of insulin on collagen synthesis in fetal rat bone,” Endocrinology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 296–302, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Hahn, S. L. Westbrook, T. L. Sullivan, W. G. Goodman, and L. R. Halstead, “Glucose transport in osteoblast-enriched bone explants: characterization and insulin regulation,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 359–365, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Ituarte, L. R. Halstead, A. Iida-Klein, H. G. Ituarte, and T. J. Hahn, “Glucose transport system in UMR-106-01 osteoblastic osteosarcoma cells: regulation by insulin,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ferron, J. Wei, T. Yoshizawa et al., “Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 296–308, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Follak, I. Klöting, and H. Merk, “Influence of diabetic metabolic state on fracture healing in spontaneously diabetic rats,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 288–296, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Follak, I. Klöting, E. Wolf, and H. Merk, “Delayed remodelling in the early period of fracture healing in spontaneously diabetic BB/OK rats depending on the diabetic metabolic state,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 473–486, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C.-H. Hou, R. F. Zernicke, and R. J. Barnard, “Effects of severe diabetes and insulin on the femoral neck of the immature rat,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 263–271, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Thrailkill, L. Liu, E. C. Wahl et al., “Bone formation is impaired in a model of type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2875–2881, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gandhi, H. A. Beam, J. P. O'Connor, J. R. Parsons, and S. S. Lin, “The effects of local insulin delivery on diabetic fracture healing,” Bone, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 482–490, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. V. Hauschka, J. B. Lian, D. E. Cole, and C. M. Gundberg, “Osteocalcin and matrix Gla protein: vitamin K-dependent proteins in bone,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 990–1047, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
N. K. Lee, H. Sowa, E. Hinoi et al., “Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton,” Cell, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 456–469, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ferron, E. Hinoi, G. Karsenty, and P. Ducy, “Osteocalcin differentially regulates beta cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 13, pp. 5266–5270, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Cousin, A. Courseaux, A. Ladoux, C. Dani, and P. Peraldi, “Cloning of hOST-PTP: the only example of a protein-tyrosine-phosphatase the function of which has been lost between rodent and human,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 259–265, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zee, C. Settembre, R. L. Levine, and G. Karsenty, “T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase regulates bone resorption and whole-body insulin sensitivity through its expression in osteoblasts,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1080–1088, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pi and L. D. Quarles, “Novel bone endocrine networks integrating mineral and energy metabolism,” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 391–399, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hinoi, N. Gao, D. Y. Jung et al., “The sympathetic tone mediates leptin's inhibition of insulin secretion by modulating osteocalcin bioactivity,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 1235–1242, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pi, Y. Wu, and L. D. Quarles, “GPRC6A mediates responses to osteocalcin in beta-cells in vitro and pancreas in vivo,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1680–1683, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mizokami, Y. Yasutake, J. Gao et al., “Osteocalcin induces release of glucagon-like peptide-1 and thereby stimulates insulin secretion in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e57375, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pi, L. Chen, M.-Z. Huang et al., “GPRC6A null mice exhibit osteopenia, feminization and metabolic syndrome,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 12, Article ID e3858, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ducy, R. Zhang, V. Geoffroy, A. L. Ridall, and G. Karsenty, “Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation,” Cell, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 747–754, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Puigserver, J. Rhee, J. Donovan et al., “Insulin-regulated hepatic gluconeogenesis through FOXO1-PGC-1α interaction,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6939, pp. 550–555, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Kindblom, C. Ohlsson, O. Ljunggren et al., “Plasma osteocalcin is inversely related to fat mass and plasma glucose in elderly Swedish men,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 785–791, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhou, X. Ma, H. Li et al., “Serum osteocalcin concentrations in relation to glucose and lipid metabolism in Chinese individuals,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 723–729, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Pittas, S. S. Harris, M. Eliades, P. Stark, and B. Dawson-Hughes, “Association between serum osteocalcin and markers of metabolic phenotype,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 827–832, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Kanazawa, T. Yamaguchi, M. Yamamoto et al., “Serum osteocalcin level is associated with glucose metabolism and atherosclerosis parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Reinehr and C. L. Roth, “A new link between skeleton, obesity and insulin resistance: relationships between osteocalcin, leptin and insulin resistance in obese children before and after weight loss,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 852–858, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Levinger, R. Zebaze, G. Jerums, D. L. Hare, S. Selig, and E. Seeman, “The effect of acute exercise on undercarboxylated osteocalcin in obese men,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1621–1626, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Q. Bao, M. Zhou, J. Zhou et al., “Relationship between serum osteocalcin and glycaemic variability in Type 2 diabetes,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Winhofer, A. Handisurya, A. Tura et al., “Osteocalcin is related to enhanced insulin secretion in gestational diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 139–143, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mori, P. D'Amelio, R. Faccio, and G. Brunetti, “The interplay between the bone and the immune system,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 720504, 16 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. C. Hofbauerand and A. E. Heufelder, “The role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand and osteoprotegerin in the pathogenesis and treatment of metabolic bone diseases,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 2355–2363, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
U. M. Malyankar, M. Scatena, K. L. Suchland, T. J. Yun, E. A. Clark, and C. M. Giachelli, “Osteoprotegerin is an alpha vbeta 3-induced, NF-kappa B-dependent survival factor for endothelial cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 28, pp. 20959–20962, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Collin-Osdoby, L. Rothe, F. Anderson, M. Nelson, and W. Maloney, “Receptor activator of NF-B and osteoprotegerin expression by human microvascular endothelial cells, regulation by inflammatory cytokines, and role in human osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 23, pp. 20659–20672, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Bucay, I. Sarosi, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification,” Genes & Development, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1260–1268, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Min, Y. M. Kim, E. C. Kim et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulates expression of receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) in endothelial cells. Concomitant increase of angiogenic responses to rank ligand,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 41, pp. 39548–39557, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Price, H. H. June, J. R. Buckley, and M. K. Williamson, “Osteoprotegerin inhibits artery calcification induced by warfarin and by vitamin D,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1610–1616, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Browner, L.-Y. Lui, and S. R. Cummings, “Associations of serum osteoprotegerin levels with diabetes, stroke, bone density, fractures, and mortality in elderly women,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 631–637, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schoppet, A. M. Sattler, J. R. Schaefer, M. Herzum, B. Maisch, and L. Hofbauer, “Increased osteoprotegerin serum levels in men with coronary artery disease,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1024–1028, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jono, Y. Ikari, A. Shioi et al., “Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1192–1194, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schoppet, J. R. Schaefer, and L. C. Hofbauer, “Low serum levels of soluble RANK ligand are associated with the presence of coronary artery disease in men,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 11, article e76, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Rasmussen and T. Ledet, “Osteoprotegerin and diabetic macroangiopathy,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kiechl, G. Schett, G. Wenning et al., “Osteoprotegerin is a risk factor for progressive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 18, pp. 2175–2180, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Morony, Y. Tintut, Z. Zhang et al., “Osteoprotegerin inhibits vascular calcification without affecting atherosclerosis in ldlr^(−/−) mice,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 411–420, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Pepene, I. R. Ilie, I. Marian, and I. Duncea, “Circulating osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand in polycystic ovary syndrome: relationships to insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-H. Gannagé-Yared, C. Yaghi, B. Habre et al., “Osteoprotegerin in relation to body weight, lipid parameters insulin sensitivity, adipocytokines, and C-reactive protein in obese and non-obese young individuals: results from both cross-sectional and interventional study,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 353–359, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Suliburska, P. Bogdanski, E. Gajewska, G. Kalmus, M. Sobieska, and W. Samborski, “The association of insulin resistance with serum osteoprotegerin in obese adolescents,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 847–853, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tavintharan, L. T. Pek, J. J. Liu et al., “Osteoprotegerin is independently associated with metabolic syndrome and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 359–362, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Haussler, G. K. Whitfield, C. A. Haussler et al., “The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325–349, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Lisse, R. F. Chun, S. Rieger, J. S. Adams, and M. Hewison, “Vitamin D activation of functionally distinct regulatory miRNAs in primary human osteoblasts,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1478–1488, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tarroni, I. Villa, E. Mrak et al., “Microarray analysis of 1,25(OH)₂D₃ regulated gene expression in human primary osteoblasts,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 640–649, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Meyer, P. D. Goetsch, and J. W. Pike, “Genome-wide analysis of the VDR/RXR cistrome in osteoblast cells provides new mechanistic insight into the actions of the vitamin D hormone,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 121, no. 1-2, pp. 136–141, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Woeckel, R. D. A. M. Alves, S. M. A. Swagemakers et al., “1α,25-(OH)₂D₃ acts in the early phase of osteoblast differentiation to enhance mineralization via accelerated production of mature matrix vesicles,” The Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 593–600, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Morris, “Vitamin D activities for health outcomes,” Annals of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 181–186, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lieben and G. Carmeliet, “Vitamin D signaling in osteocytes: effects on bone and mineral homeostasis,” Bone, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 237–243, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lieben, R. Masuyama, S. Torrekens et al., “Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D-induced inhibition of bone mineralization,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 1803–1815, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Noda, R. L. Vogel, A. M. Craig, J. Prahl, H. F. Deluca, and D. T. Denhardt, “Identification of a DNA sequence responsible for binding of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin enhancement of mouse secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP-1 or osteopontin) gene expression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 24, pp. 9995–9999, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bouvard, C. Annweiler, A. Sallé et al., “Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D: facts, uncertainties, and controversies,” Joint, Bone, Spine: Revue du Rhumatisme, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Norman, B. J. Frankel, A. M. Heldt, and G. M. Grodsky, “Vitamin D deficiency inhibits pancreatic secretion of insulin,” Science, vol. 209, no. 4458, pp. 823–825, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Esteghamati, Z. Aryan, A. Esteghamati, and M. Nakhjavani, “Vitamin D deficiency is associated with insulin resistance in nondiabetics and reduced insulin production in type 2 diabetics,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Maestro, N. Dávila, M. C. Carranza, and C. Calle, “Identification of a Vitamin D response element in the human insulin receptor gene promoter,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 84, no. 2-3, pp. 223–230, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-Y. Oh and E. Barrett-Connor, “Association between vitamin D receptor polymorphism and type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling older adults: the Rancho Bernardo study,” Metabolism, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 356–359, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Malecki, J. Frey, D. Moczulski, T. Klupa, E. Kozek, and J. Sieradzki, “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and association with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Polish population,” Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 505–509, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kajikawa, H. Ishida, S. Fujimoto et al., “An insulinotropic effect of vitamin D analog with increasing intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration in pancreatic β-cells through nongenomic signal transduction,” Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 4706–4712, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Baggio and D. J. Drucker, “Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 2131–2157, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Drucker, “The biology of incretin hormones,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 153–165, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Bollag, Q. Zhong, P. Phillips et al., “Osteoblast-derived cells express functional glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide receptors,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 1228–1235, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhong, T. Itokawa, S. Sridhar et al., “Effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide on osteoclast function,” American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. E543–E548, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tsukiyama, Y. Yamada, C. Yamada et al., “Gastric inhibitory polypeptide as an endogenous factor promoting new bone formation after food ingestion,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1644–1651, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhong, K.-H. Ding, A. L. Mulloy, R. J. Bollag, and C. M. Isales, “Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide stimulates proliferation and TGF-β release from MG-63 cells,” Peptides, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 611–616, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Bjarnason, E. E. G. Henriksen, P. Alexandersen, S. Christgau, D. B. Henriksen, and C. Christiansen, “Mechanism of circadian variation in bone resorption,” Bone, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 307–313, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nissen, M. Christensen, F. K. Knop, T. Vilsbøll, J. J. Holst, and B. Hartmann, “Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide inhibits bone resorption in humans,” Journal Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. E2325–E2329, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Scherer, S. Williams, M. Fogliano, G. Baldini, and H. F. Lodish, “A novel serum protein similar to C1q, produced exclusively in adipocytes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 45, pp. 26746–26749, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Maeda, K. Okubo, I. Shimomura, T. Funahashi, Y. Matsuzawa, and K. Matsubara, “cDNA cloning and expression of a novel adipose specific collagen-like factor, apM1 (adipose most abundant gene transcript 1),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 286–289, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nakano, T. Tobe, N.-H. Choi-Miura, T. Mazda, and M. Tomita, “Isolation and characterization of GBP28, a novel gelatin-binding protein purified from human plasma,” The Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 803–812, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ye and P. E. Scherer, “Adiponectin, driver or passenger on the road to insulin sensitivity?” Molecular Metabolism, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 133–141, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tao, A. Sifuentes, and W. L. Holland, “Regulation of glucose and lipid homeostasis by adiponectin: effects on hepatocytes, pancreatic β cells and adipocytes,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Nawrocki, M. W. Rajala, E. Tomas et al., “Mice lacking adiponectin show decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity and reduced responsiveness to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 5, pp. 2654–2660, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yamauchi, J. Kamon, Y. Minokoshi et al., “Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1288–1295, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Holland, R. A. Miller, Z. V. Wang et al., “Receptor-mediated activation of ceramidase activity initiates the pleiotropic actions of adiponectin,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-H. Luo, L.-J. Guo, L.-Q. Yuan et al., “Adiponectin stimulates human osteoblasts proliferation and differentiation via the MAPK signaling pathway,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 309, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Oshima, A. Nampei, M. Matsuda et al., “Adiponectin increases bone mass by suppressing osteoclast and activating osteoblast,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 520–526, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shinoda, M. Yamaguchi, N. Ogata et al., “Regulation of bone formation by adiponectin through autocrine/paracrine and endocrine pathways,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 196–208, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. H. Luo, L. J. Guo, H. Xie et al., “Adiponectin stimulates RANKL and inhibits OPG expression in human osteoblasts through the MAPK signaling pathway,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1648–1656, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kajimura, H. W. Lee, K. J. Riley et al., “Adiponectin regulates bone mass via opposite central and peripheral mechanisms through FoxO1,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 901–915, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Maria Felicia Faienza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3179

Downloads

1435

Citations