Research Article

The Blocking on the Cathepsin B and Fibronectin Accumulation in Kidney Glomeruli of Diabetic Rats

Table 3

The values of body weight and kidney weight and ratio of kidney weight/body weight and FN concentrations and cathepsin B activity in homogenates of glomeruli and the content of fibronectin within the glomerulus identified by immunohistochemistry.

GroupsGlomerular homogenatesImmunohistochemistry
Kidney weight/body weight %Protein/DNAFN/proteinFN/DNACathepsin B/proteinCathepsin B/DNAFN score
μg/μgng/μgng/μgμIU/μgμIU/μg

DM
 Mean ± SD0.60 ± 0.0623.2 ± 6.500.054 ± 0.0200.95 ± 0.281.36 ± 0.37#$30.60 ± 9.65#2.33 ± 0.52$
 Median (range)0.6 (0.53–0.68)23.94 (14.64–32.89)0.05 (0.029–0.088)0.89 (0.68–1.48)1.31 (0.92–1.79)28.37 (21.09–50.96)2.00 (2.00-3.00)
EN
 Mean ± SD0.61 ± 0.0318.1 ± 6.000.034 ± 0.0180.50 ± 0.281.5 ± 0.78#$25.99 ± 16.75#$2.0 ± 0.82$
 Median (range)0.6 (0.58–0.66)16.85 (9.10–27.30)0.031 (0.012–0.069)0.42 (0.16–1.02)1.43 (0.58–2.46)19.14 (12.53–59.90)2.00 (1.00–3.00)
LOS
 Mean ± SD0.64 ± 0.05$15.68 ± 5.710.056 ± 0.0220.75 ± 0.301.39 ± 0.72#$21.71 ± 14.32#$1.60 ± 1.07
 Median (range)0.64 (0.57–0.75)15.27 (7.75–25.19)0.055 (0.016–0.09)0.79 (0.24–1.10)1.21 (0.49–2.97)17.98 (10.71–49.64)2.00 (0.00–3.00)
EN + LOS
 Mean ± SD0.65 ± 0.1117.65 ± 5.990.058 ± 0.0160.81 ± 0.333.11 ± 1.3651.79 ± 20.372.30 ± 0.67$
 Median (range)0.61 (0.57–0.92)17.73 (10.82–30.62)0.058 (0.036–0.086)0.80 (0.50–1.54)2.78 (1.04–5.32)53.96 (21.49–80.01)2.00 (1.00–3.00)
SPIR
 Mean ± SD0.59 ± 0.0617.31 ± 4.200.058 ± 0.0220.72 ± 0.272.58 ± 1.1944.88 ± 23.130.90 ± 0.99
 Median (range)0.59 (0.47–0.67)16.64 (11.58–24.49)0.057 (0.021–0.091)0.70 (0.33–1.13)2.78 (1.04–4.09)49.28 (16.59–83.64)1.00 (0.00–3.00)
DIH
 Mean ± SD0.54 ± 0.0518.57 ± 3.900.062 ± 0.0220.81 ± 0.381.17 ± 0.64#$22.70 ± 14.97#$1.70 ± 0.95
 Median (range)0.56 (0.47–0.6)19.45 (12.91–22.77)0.054 (0.04–0.097)0.62 (0.45–1.50)0.96 (0.52–2.29)16.02 (7.66–51.97)1.50 (1.00–4.00)

Results are shown as mean ± SD and median (range). Statistically significant differences between the groups have been shown, the levels of significance in the 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance with the DM group; #statistical significance with the EN + LOS group; $statistical significance with the SPIR group; statistical significance with the DIH group.
Kidney weight/body weight value: DM versus DIH = 0.01; DIH versus EN = 0.01; DIH versus LOS = 0.0001; DIH versus EN + LOS = 0.01; DIH versus SPIR = 0.04; SPIR versus LOS = 0.03.
Protein/DNA value: DM versus LOS = 0.01; DM versus SPIR = 0.045.
Cathepsin B/protein value: DM versus EN + LOS = 0.001; DM versus SPIR = 0.02; EN + LOS versus EN = 0.002; EN + LOS versus LOS = 0.001; EN + LOS versus DIH = 0.0004; SPIR versus EN = 0.03; SPIR versus LOS = 0.02; SPIR versus DIH = 0.009.
Cathepsin B/DNA value: DM versus EN + LOS = 0.04; EN + LOS versus EN = 0.01; EN + LOS versus LOS = 0.01; EN + LOS versus DIH = 0.01; SPIR versus EN = 0.05; SPIR versus LOS = 0.02; SPIR versus DIH = 0.03.
FN by immunohistochemistry -value: DM versus SPIR = 0.003; SPIR versus EN = 0.02; SPIR versus EN + LOS = 0.003.