Research Article

The “Lipid Accumulation Product” Is Associated with 2-Hour Postload Glucose Outcomes in Overweight/Obese Subjects with Nondiabetic Fasting Glucose

Table 2

Features of female patients according to tertiles of waist circumference, LAP, and HOMA-IR.

Age (years)aBMI (kg/m2)aWaist (cm)aLAP (cm × mmol/L)bGlucose (mmol/L)bInsulin (U/dL)bHOMA-IR b2h-PG (mmol/L)b

Overall ()40.1 (12.1)36.9 (6.2)104.0 (13.0)56.9 [40.3–89.1] 5.1 (0.6)13.4 (7.8)3.1 (2.0)6.9 [5.8–8.4]
Waist tertiles
 I () 37.6 (11.7) 31.9 (2.8) 90.8 (4.3) 38.7 [24.6–49.8]4.9 (0.6)10.7 (4.5) 2.3 (1.1)5.3 [6.1–7.4]
 II ()41.4 (11.4) 36.3 (4.1)102.2 (3.4) 58.6 [46.0–85.3] 5.1 (0.7) 13.1 (6.6) 3.0 (1.7) 7.2 [6.1–8.7]
 III ()41.3 (12.6) 42.6 (5.7) 119.3 (8.1) 90.2 [65.2–124.5] 5.2 (0.6) 16.5 (10.1)3.9 (2.5)7.4 [6.3–8.8]
value*0.048<0.001<0.001<0.0010.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001
LAP tertiles
 I () 38.3 (11.9) 33.4 (4.5) 94.9 (9.2) 32.2 [24.4–40.3] 4.8 (0.5) 10.4 (5.7) 2.3 (1.4) 6.2 [5.2–7.0]
 II ()39.5 (12.4) 36.7 (4.9) 103.2 (10.1) 59.6 [49.6–68.7] 5.0 (0.6) 13.0 (7.7) 2.9 (1.8) 6.5 [5.7–7.9]
 III ()42.4 (11.5)40.8 (6.6) 114.1 (11.7) 105.0 [89.9–124.5] 5.3 (0.6)16.8 (8.4)4.0 (2.2)8.4 [7.3–10.5]
value*0.058<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001 <0.001<0.001<0.001
HOMA tertiles
 I () 40.1 (12.1)35.0 (5.8) 100.3 (12.7) 44.3 [32.0–66.2] 4.7 (0.5) 6.4 (2.0) 1.3 (0.4) 6.3 [5.2–7.6]
 II ()39.4 (11.7) 36.8 (5.6) 103.3 (11.9) 56.9 [40.4–88.0] 5.0 (0.6) 12.1 (2.1) 2.7 (0.4) 6.9 [5.7–8.4]
 III ()40.7 (12.3)38.9 (6.4)108.4 (13.0)83.0 [49.5–116.5] 5.4 (0.6)21.7 (7.6)5.2 (1.9) 7.7 [6.3–9.8]
value*0.659<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

Data are reported as mean (standard deviation)a or median [interquartile range, 25th–75th percentile]b or percentage. Percentages are calculated within groups.
BMI, body mass index; LAP, lipid accumulation product; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; 2h-PG, 2-hour oral post load glucose.
*According to ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test.
All the groups significantly different () to one another by post hoc comparisons of means.
versus the other groups by post hoc comparisons of means.
, 1st tertile versus 3rd tertile by post hoc comparisons of means.