Table 3: Results of adjustment randomized comparisons.

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)P value

Mean intima-media thickness
Model 12.29 (1.17–4.47)0.015
Model 22.27 (1.16–4.44)0.016
Model 32.48 (1.24–4.93)0.010
Model 42.60 (1.29–5.28)0.008
Model 52.89 (1.34–6.24)0.007
Right maximum intima-media thickness
Model 11.77 (1.00–3.13)0.049
Model 21.78 (1.00–3.14)0.049
Model 31.87 (1.04–3.34)0.036
Model 41.88 (1.05–3.40)0.035
Model 52.15 (1.12–4.14)0.022
Left maximum intima-media thickness
Model 12.22 (1.25–3.92)0.006
Model 22.24 (1.26–3.98)0.006
Model 32.33 (1.28–4.22)0.006
Model 42.43 (1.32–4.48)0.004
Model 52.46 (1.28–4.73)0.007

Multiple logistic regression analysis included the treatment group, age, gender, and baseline IMT (model 1); model 1 plus body mass index and current smoking (model 2); model 2 plus HbA1c, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and systolic blood pressure (model 3); model 3 plus eGFR, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin II receptor blocker, use of statin, and use of antiplatelets (model 4); model 4 plus the use of oral hypoglycemic agents (model 5).