Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Guangzhou, Southern China: Focus on the Differences among Different Wagner’s Grades, IDSA/IWGDF Grades, and Ulcer Types
Table 1
Characteristics of DFIs of varying Wagner’s grades, IDSA/IWGDF grades, and DFU types.
Clinical characteristic
Wagner’s grades
IDSA/IWGDF grades
DFU types
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
IFU
NFU
N-IFU
Number of patients (n)
7
34
44
32
1
54
53
9
53
5
59
Mean age (years, y)a
66.7 ± 14.8
64.7 ± 9.7
64.0 ± 11.0
66.1 ± 11.6
63.4
65.9 ± 11.2
65.0 ± 11.6
62.2 ± 11.5
64.8 ± 11.5
63.4 ± 14.0
65.5 ± 11.0
Male/female (n)
2/5
20/14
30/14
20/12
1/0
34/20
32/21
5/4
35/18
2/3
35/24
Duration of diabetes
1.5 (59.0)
2.5 (23.0)
18.6 (24.5)
4.2 (7.6)
1.8
2.7 (23.9)
6.5 (23.5)
2.8 (13.6)
4 (23.0)
24 (31.3)
6.8 (10.5)
(months, m)b
BMIa
24.5 ± 6.0
24.5 ± 5.6
23.4 ± 2.7
27.0 ± 2.1
25.9
24.0 ± 4.4
27.7 ± 2.1
23.3 ± 2.2
28.3 ± 2.1
24.9 ± 3.9
23.4 ± 3.8
HbA1c (%)a
6.5 ± 1.4
8.9 ± 2.0
8.0 ± 2.3
8.8 ± 2.9
7.9
8.6 ± 2.4
7.9 ± 2.1
9.9 ± 3.2
8.6 ± 2.2
9.6 ± 2.8
8.3 ± 2.6
CRP (mg/L)b
19.7 (76.3)
22 (46.5)
25.5 (72.8)
91.9 (226.9)
11
21.8 (47.5)
49.3 (117.9)
197.6 (231.4)
22.7 (69.5)
10.9 (129.0)
70 (82.7)
PCT (mmol/L)b
0.2 (0.1)
0.2 (0.3)
1.0 (0.3)
2.5 (0.6)
0
0.2 (0.2)
0.7 (0.1)
2.4 (0.4)
0.2 (0.1)
0.1 (0.0)
0.7 (0.2)
Newly diagnosedc
1 (14.3)
11 (32.4)
7 (15.9)
12 (37.5)
0 (0.0)
21 (38.8)
8 (15.1)
2 (22.2)
11 (20.75)
0 (0.0)
20 (33.8)
Polymicrobial infectionc
4 (57.1)
22 (64.7%)
24 (54.5%)
20 (62.5%)
0 (0.0)
38 (70.4%)
27 (50.9%)
6 (66.7%)
28 (52.8%)
1 (20.0%)
41 (69.5%)
aExpressed as mean ± SD; bexpressed as media (interquartile range); cexpressed as number (percentage); BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reaction protein; PCT: procalcitonin. , compared between different groups.
