Research Article
Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Guangzhou, Southern China: Focus on the Differences among Different Wagner’s Grades, IDSA/IWGDF Grades, and Ulcer Types
Table 3
Potential and alarming empirical regimens for different Wagner’s grades, IDSA/IWGDF grades, and types of diabetic foot infections.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
β-L-ase: β-lactam, β-lactamase inhibitor; β-L-ase 1: amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam; β-L-ase 2: ticarcillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam; group 1: carbapenem, ertapenem; group 2: carbapenem, imipenem, meropenem; ceph: cephalosporin; gen: generation; FQ: fluoroquinolone with good activity against aerobic Gram-positive cocci (e.g., levofloxacin or moxifloxacin); cipro: antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone, for example, ciprofloxacin; T/S; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; pen: penicilin. aAll the Staphylococcus aureus isolates were sensetive to teicoplanin, linezolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin; bthe agents whose resistant rates were <30%; cthe agents whose resistant rates were >70%. |