Research Article

Characterization of the Effects of a Six-Month Dancing as Approach for Successful Aging

Table 2

Subjects’ physical fitness parameters in pre- (T0) and postdance (T6) practice. Values are represented as mean ± SD.

Females (n=17)Males (n=8)Pooled (n=25)
T0T6T0T6T0T6

Balance (p.ti)4.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.0
CST (sec)7.79 ± 1.586.17 ± 1.477.71 ± 1.786.64 ± 2.037.77 ± 1.616.31 ± 1.64
GS (sec)4.92 ± 0.964.67 ± 0.865.26 ± 0.934.42 ± 1.045.03 ± 0.954.59 ± 0.91
SPPB (p.ti)11.5 ± 0.911.6 ± 0.611.4 ± 0.711.3 ± 0.711.4 ± 0.811.5 ± 0.65
30CST (n)22.6 ± 6.917.7 ± 5.317.6 ± 5.917.9 ± 4.121.0 ± 6.917.8 ± 4.85
TUG (sec)8.00 ± 1.107.50 ± 1.308.20 ± 1.207.70 ± 1.308.07 ± 1.147.59 ± 1.28
ST (step)110.0 ± 35.6129.3 ± 34.9126.3 ± 31.5126.0 ± 33.5115.3 ± 34.5128.3 ± 33.8
HG ()21.2 ± 4.221.3 ± 4.627.4 ± 7.529.3 ± 8.723.2 ± 6.123.8 ± 7.12

CST: Chair Stand test; GS: Gait Speed; SPPB: Short Physical Performance Battery; 30CST: 30s Sit-to-Stand test; TUG: Timed Up-and-Go test; ST: Step Test; and HG: Hand Grip. P≤0.05 vs. pre; P≤0.01 vs. pre; and P≤0.05 vs. females.