International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2020 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8601796 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8601796

Yan-Jun He, Chong-Ge You, "The Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in the Prevention and Treatment of Lipid Metabolism Disorders", International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2020, Article ID 8601796, 9 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8601796

The Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in the Prevention and Treatment of Lipid Metabolism Disorders

Academic Editor: Dario Acu a Castroviejo
Received09 May 2020
Revised24 Aug 2020
Accepted03 Sep 2020
Published14 Sep 2020

Abstract

Due to changes in lifestyle, diet structure, and aging worldwide, the incidence of metabolic syndromes such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity is increasing. Metabolic syndrome is considered to be closely related to cardiovascular disease and severely affects human health. In recent years, researchers have revealed that the gut microbiota, through its own or interacting metabolites, has a positive role in regulating metabolic syndrome. Therefore, the gut microbiota has been a new “organ” for the treatment of metabolic syndrome. The role has not been clarified, and more research is necessary to prove the specific role of specific strains. Probiotics are also believed to regulate metabolic syndromes by regulating the gut microbiota and are expected to become a new preparation for treating metabolic syndromes. This review focuses on the regulation of lipid metabolism disorders by the gut microbiota through the effects of bile acids (BA), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile salt hydrolase (BSH), and genes such as ABCG5 and ABCG8, FXR, NPC1L, and LDL-R.

1. Introduction

With the aging of the population, the incidence of metabolic syndromes such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes has progressively increased. Metabolic diseases are associated with an increased risk of mortality in the elderly, and in particular, hyperlipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease [1], leading to cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, which seriously endanger health. Yusuf et al. [2] conducted large standardized case-control studies in 52 countries around the world and found that the incidence of dyslipidemia, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, abdominal obesity, and psychosocial factors is associated with an increased risk of heart disease in all regions of the world, but edible fruits and vegetables, regular physical exercise, and avoiding smoking can reduce the relative risk of myocardial infarction, among which smoking and dyslipidemia are the two most important risk factors. Previous studies have found that some Lactic Acid Bacteria can reduce cholesterol in high-fat diet animals [3], improve insulin resistance and obesity [4], and alleviate the damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier [5]. In the case of abnormal lipid metabolism, improving the structure of the gut microbiota may affect the physiological state of the host.

Gut microbiota, the normal flora of the human intestinal tract, are numerous and abundant. Bifidobacterium genus and Lactobacillus genus can synthesize vitamins and essential amino acids that are necessary for human growth and development, and participate in the metabolism of sugars and proteins, which have an important role in human health. Gut microbes are a vast and complex system of the human body that contain 100 times more genes than in the human body [6]. The gut microbiota is mainly composed of four phyla, namely, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria [7]. Among them, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Eubacteria, Clostridium, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, and Rumenococcus are predominant, and Escherichia, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Lactobacillus, and Proteus are subdominant genus [8].

The way microorganisms affect human metabolism depends not only on their quantity but also the metabolites that interact with the host or themselves [9]. For example, Lactobacillus paracei and Escherichia coli inhibit lipid secretion by enterocytes increasing intracellular fat storage and enhancing lipid catabolism, respectively [10]. Lactobacillus rhamnosus can enhance the presence of another Lactic Acid Bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus, and the symbiotic relationship between the two and their production of metabolites (such as SCFA) enables the host intestinal cells to more efficiently use lipids in the diet, thereby reducing lipid content [11]. A recent study showed that feeding high-fat mice with Lactobacillus plantarum LC27 and Bifidobacterium longum LC67 can regulate the activation of NF-κB and AMPK by inhibiting the production of lipopolysaccharides from the intestinal microbial flora, reducing liver steatosis, obesity, and colitis [12]. Early studies have shown that changes in the structure of the gut microbiota are related to some abnormal lipid metabolism, such as atherosclerosis, obesity, and diabetes [58]. In this review, we mainly introduce the role of gut microbes in regulating dyslipidemia and the underlying mechanism of this regulation and propose a microbial pathway for the treatment of lipid metabolism disorders.

2. Relationship between Gut Microbiota, Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Hyperlipidemia

2.1. Gut Microbiota and Hyperlipidemia

Gut microbiota is closely associated with disorders of lipid metabolism and even affect the occurrence of cardiovascular disease. In a six-year follow-up experiment by Framingham Study, a longitudinal prospective study of coronary heart disease, elevated serum cholesterol levels were considered to be bound up with the development of coronary heart disease [13]. The intestinal microbiome is a biomarker for cardiac metabolic disorders. Prevotella, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Faecalibacterium show characteristic changes in patients with lipid metabolism disorders [9]. Kazuyuki et al. [14] found that plasma and liver cholesterol levels of Apo-E-deficient mice lacking intestinal microbiota were significantly increased, but the formation of atherosclerotic lesions was markedly reduced, which may be related to the weakening of the lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammatory response, and the gut microbiota may promote atherosclerosis. Martinez-Guryn et al. [15] found that the small intestinal microflora affect the absorption of lipids in the intestine and regulates lipid metabolism by regulating the digestion and absorption process of intestinal epithelial cells and this process is related to the action of specific bacterial strains. This evidence further correlates the gut microbiota with lipid metabolism.

Diet is a key factor in the formation of the gut microbiota [16] and the intestinal microbiota can quickly respond to changing diets [17], affecting lipid absorption. High-fat diets lead to elevated serum and liver TG levels, which may be related to increased levels of de novo fat production and TG synthesis and decreased expression of genes related to fatty acid oxidation [18], and high-cholesterol diets can reduce the diversity of gut microbiota [19]. In addition, aging can cause changes in the composition of the gut microbiota [15]. Zeng et al [20] were the first to demonstrate that short-term (2 months) dietary restrictions in elderly mice can restore the elderly dysfunctional gut microbiota to young levels. This finding helps to improve the incidence of age-related diseases. Gender differences in fat metabolism have also been reported to be related to the composition of the intestinal microbiota. After oral probiotics, female serum TG and LDL-C decreased more markedly than in men [21, 22]. Haro et al. [23] found a correlation between gut microbiota and gender and body mass index in a prospective, randomized, open, and controlled trial. Jingyuan Fu et al. [24] studied 893 subjects from the Life Lines-DEEP population cohort and found that 34 bacterial groups are related to body mass index and blood lipids. Intestinal microbes may play an important role in the changes in body mass index and blood lipid levels, which is independent of age, sex, and host genetics. A meta-analysis found that, in terms of BMI, the reduction in TC and LDL-C was almost the same between normal and obese people. However, compared with short-term (4 weeks) intervention, long-term (>4 weeks) probiotic intervention can effectively reduce serum LDL-C and triglycerides [25].

It can be seen that the role of the gut microbiota is closely related to age, gender, body mass index, intervention time, and dosage. These contradictory results propose that we should individualize the treatment of lipid metabolism through the gut microbiota. In short, these observations provide novel avenues and insights for validation and follow-up research, while revealing the importance of holding a healthy diet to prevent the development of lifestyle-related diseases.

2.2. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Hyperlipidemia

For the intervention of lipid metabolism in the body, many people have gradually realized the harm of long-term drug treatment, so they have paid more attention to the intervention of lifestyle. The diet is regarded as the basis to treat dyslipidemia, and exercise is also an important first-line intervention for dyslipidemia. Recent studies have shown that edible probiotics have a potential effect on lipid metabolism.

Probiotics are living microorganisms that, when given in sufficient amounts, have a beneficial effect on the host by altering the balance of known flora in the intestine [26]. Probiotics are increasingly important for health benefits, but one obstacle to using new probiotic cultures is their safety [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly check the biosafety and health benefits of probiotics before using them. Human probiotic microorganisms belong mostly to the following genera: Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus [27]. At present, the most used probiotics mainly include Bifidobacteria and/or lactobacilli, as well as other Lactic Acid Bacteria, such as lactococci and streptococci [28].

Probiotics can increase the peristalsis of the intestine [29], reduce the residence time of feces in the intestine, and prevent harmful substances from getting into the body from the intestine. Most studies have shown that the intake of probiotics can reduce serum TC and TG [11, 12, 21, 22, 2934], and only a small part can decrease LDL [12, 21, 30, 32, 3437] and increase HDL [12, 16, 32, 34, 35, 37]. The intake of probiotics will also change the structure of the gut microbiota. Most of them can increase the proportion of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [11, 2931, 33, 35, 38, 39] (Table 1). The gut microbiota is mainly controlled by Firmicutes and Bacteroides [9]; therefore increases in one almost always imply reductions in the other. In patients with mild hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia, one week after oral administration of Bifidobacterium bifidum TMC 3115 strain, the level of the Firmicutes phylum increased and that of the Bacteroides phylum decreased [21].


Author, yearModel (human/animal)GenderProbioticsDosage and durationChanges in gut microbiotaLipid changes

Falcinelli et al., 2015 [11]ZebrafishFemale and maleLactobacillus rhamnosus1 × 106 CFU/ml 18 hoursIncreased Firmicutes, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus thermophilus; reduced ActinomycesReduced TC and TG
In Kim et al., 2019 [12]C57BL/6 miceMaleLactobacillus plantarumLC27, Bifidobacterium longumLC671 × 109 CFU/ml 4 weeksReduced Firmicutes and ProteobacteriaReduced TC and LDL-C; increased HDL-C
Wang et al., 2018 [21]HumanNo descriptionBifidobacterium bifidum TMC31153 × 1010 CFU/mL 3 weeksIncreased Firmicutes; reduced BacteroidesReduced TC and LDL-C
Costabile et al., 2017 [22]Human34 females, 15 malesLactobacillus plantarum ECGC 131104022 × 109 CFU/ml 12 weeksNo significant differencesReduced TC and TG; increased HDL-C
Shin et al., 2018 [30]Sprague Dawley ratsMaleA probiotic formulation containing 2 Lactobacillus strains, 3 Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST31 × 107 CFU/ml 8 weeksIncreased Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium; reduced FirmicutesReduced TC, TG, and LDL-C
Salazar et al., 2019 [31]C57BL/6 miceMaleB. animalis IPLA R1 strain5 × 108 CFU/ml 10 daysIncreased BifidobacteriumReduced TG
wang et al., 2017 [32]ChicksMaleLactobacillus johnsonii1 × 106 CFU/ml 42 daysIncreased Bacteroides and Lactobacillus; reduced Escherichia coliReduced TG and LDL-C increased HDL-C
Chen et al., 2015 [29]Wistar ratsMaleLactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301109 CFU/ml 28 daysIncreased Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and Enterococcus; reduced Escherichia coli and ClostridiumReduced TC and TG
Park et al., 2018 [34]C57BL/6JTacN miceMaleLactobacillus rhamnosus strain BFE52641 × 1010 CFU/ml 9 weeksIncreased MucispirillumReduced TC and LDL-C; increased HDL-C
lyea et al, 2017 [35]BALB/c miceMaleLactobacillus fermentum FTDC 83121 × 109 CFU/ml 7 weeksIncreased Akkermansia, Desulfovibrio, Oscillospira, and LactobacillusReduced TC and LDL-C; increased HDL-C
Zhu et al., 2019 [38]C57BL/6J miceMaleEnterococcus faecalis ATCC194335 × 109 CFU/ml 4 weeksIncreased Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, and Bacteroides; reduced FirmicutesReduced TC and LDL-C
Briand et al., 2019 [40]Golden Syrian hamstersMaleSaccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-7453g/kg 39 daysIncreased Proteobacteria and Lentispharerae; reduced Firmicutes, and TenericutesReduced TC; reduced HDL-C at 21 days
Liu et al., 2017 [36]Immature kunming ratsMaleLactic Acid Bacteria 961 × 109 cfu/mL 5 weeksReduced Escherichia coliReduced TG, TC, and LDL-C
Ichim et al., 2016 [37]C57BL/6J miceNo descriptionDBR:a proprietary blend of 9 probiotic organisms and 10 digestive enzymes65 μg/ml 8 weeksIncreased LactobacilliReduced LDL-C; increased HDL-C

CFU: colony-forming units; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Probiotics may reduce cholesterol by promoting fatty acid oxidation and reducing fatty acid synthesis in the liver, promoting intestinal development and digestion, and balancing gut microbiota in the small intestine, reducing fat accumulation [31]. However, some experiments have shown that probiotics may not always have a positive effect on gut microbiota. Ataie-Jafari et al. [41], by giving yogurt containing two probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus) to patients with hypercholesterolemia, found that compared with ordinary yogurt, except for significantly lowering total serum cholesterol, there were no other changes. Mazloom et al. [42] found that probiotics had no significant effect on blood lipid- and blood glucose-related parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. Different probiotics have different effects on metabolism, and this result may depend on the strain, dosage, and ingredients used to produce a particular probiotic product [27].

Prebiotics are nondigestible food components used by intestinal microbes. They can selectively stimulate the growth and/or activity of one or more beneficial bacteria and have a beneficial effect on the host [43]. For example, after feeding high-fat diet mice supplemented with 1% grape polyphenols for 12 weeks, the intestinal microbial community structure significantly changed, the amount of Akkermansia muciniphila in the intestine increased, the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes decreased [44], and the proliferation of Akkermansia muciniphila depends on its baseline abundance [45]. In addition, the increased colonization of Akkermansia muciniphila in the intestinal tract protects mice from the excessive production of chylomicrons and VLDL induced by acute lipid load, helps to maintain the homeostasis of lipid metabolism in the host, and alleviates the symptoms of metabolic syndrome [46]. Alissa C. and others were the first to give oligofructose-enriched inulin to overweight and obese children. It was found that serum triglycerides in the prebiotic group were significantly reduced, and the number of Bifidobacteria and Actinomyces increased [47], thereby improving obesity outcomes of overweight/obese children. Prebiotic treatment increases plasma intestinal peptide concentration (glucagon-like peptide 1 and YY peptide) [48] and the expression of intestinal antimicrobial peptide regenerating islet-derived 3-gamma, which is a key protein in the transformation of intestinal epithelial cells. It also regulates the structure of the intestinal flora, improves the balance of the intestinal environment, and helps strengthen the intestinal barrier induced by prebiotics [49] and regulate human obesity and metabolic syndrome. Previous studies have also found that prebiotics can improve blood glucose regulation disorders (glucose tolerance and insulin resistance) in db/db mice [50].

These findings provide the basis for probiotics and prebiotics as a well-tolerated, easy-to-use natural cholesterol-lowering supplement, confirming that probiotics and prebiotics activate metabolic pathways and enhance overall health. Therefore, supplementing probiotics and prebiotics can be useful in preventing hyperlipidemia function and may reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

3. Proposed Mechanisms of Gut Microbiota on Hyperlipidemia

3.1. Biological Mechanisms of Gut Microbiota to Reduce Cholesterol

The gut microbiota is associated with the metabolism of two types of cholesterol: one is de novo cholesterol synthesized from the diet or liver, and the other is cholesterol from tissues and bile acids synthesized by cholesterol [51]. There are several possible mechanisms by which gut microbiota can lower cholesterol.

Cholesterol is bound to the cell surface, and the bound cholesterol is not easily absorbed by the enterohepatic circulation, resulting in increased cholesterol excretion [35]. Another study showed that Lactobacillus acidophilus can also reduce cholesterol by assimilating cholesterol to the cell membrane, and its assimilation is impacted by the amount of bile [52].

In addition to clearing cholesterol directly from the systemic circulation, cholesterol can also be converted into bile acids in advance [53]. Bile acid is an important component of bile and plays a significant role in fat metabolism. About 95% of bile acids are reabsorbed in the distal ileum and returned to the liver through the enterohepatic circulation, and the remaining 5% of bile acids are excreted in the feces. Cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase(CYP7A1) is used to convert cholesterol in the liver into bile acids and excreted in feces, which are the main pathways of cholesterol catabolism [54], whereas sterol-27 hydroxylase (encoded by CYP27A1) and CYP7B1 is mainly involved in the alternative pathway [55]. Under the action of the gut microbiota, the primary BA is converted to secondary BA. The production of secondary bile acids can be mediated by bile salt hydrolase [56], high-fat diet, and high expression of bile salt hydrolase (BSH) genes that cause fecal deoxy cholic acid (DCA) increases [17]. Chen et al. [29] found that the bile acid concentration in the stool of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301 group was considerably higher than that in the control group (), confirming this view. Lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301 was screened from gut samples taken from individuals living in the Bama Longevity Village, Guangxi Province in China, and has the ability to lower blood lipids, which reduces the concentration of cholesterol by inducing the deconjugation and increased precipitation of bile acids in the intestinal lumen, thereby increasing its fecal excretion.

In turn, elevated DCA levels may cause microbial disturbances on the animal-based diet, inhibiting the growth of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes [17]. Bile acid synthesis is regulated by cholesterol enzymes. HMG-CoA synthase 1 (Hmgcs1) and HMG-CoA reductase (Hmgcr), which are involved in cholesterol synthesis, are downregulated in the liver of sterile mice, so there is the lack of intestinal microbiota bile acid synthesis in hypercholesterolemia mice [14]. Öner et al. [57] studied the cholesterol-lowering mechanism of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria and showed that only probiotics containing the bile salt hydrolase gene can reduce cholesterol, and increased bile salt hydrolase activity leads to increased bile excretion into feces [35]. BSH is widely distributed in Bacteriodetes, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Listeria, and Bifidobacterium [58]. BSH-active probiotics can increase the deconjugation of bile salts in enterohepatic circulation, leading to increased levels of deconjugated bile acids in the circulation, and the solubility of bile acids decreases after deconjugated and is absorbed in the intestinal tract and, then, excreted in feces [22]. Cholesterol is, then, used to synthesize de novo bile acids in the body, thereby reducing serum cholesterol [59]. However, BSH activity leads to an increase in the production of secondary bile acids, which may have a negative impact on human health. The increase in their concentration in the intestine may cause intestinal inflammation [60] and may even promote intestinal cancer [61] (Figure 1).

In conventional mice, cholesterol is converted into bile acids through the main pathway that CYP7A1 participates in and another pathway that CYP27A1 and CYP7B1 participate in. Under the action of the gut microbiota, primary bile acids are transformed into secondary bile acids. This process can also be mediated by BSH. Some probiotics reduce the cholesterol concentration by inducing the deconjugation of bile acids in the intestinal lumen and increasing precipitation. In addition, the gut microbiota can produce SCFA (especially, butyrate, acetate, and propionate), blocking the synthesis of liver cholesterol. In germ-free mice, the expression of FXR is upregulated. Bile acid acts as a ligand to bind and activate FXR, resulting in an increase in FGF15. FGF15 binds to FGFR4 and inhibits the expression of CYP7A1 gene, which affects cholesterol metabolism. In addition, Hmgcs1 and Hmgcr, which are involved in cholesterol metabolism, are downregulated in the liver of sterile mice, leading to increased liver cholesterol levels. Lack of gut microbiota will affect the metabolism of cholesterol, reduce the production of bile acids, and lead to elevated cholesterol.

In addition, the gut microbiota can increase the content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the intestine, blocking the synthesis of liver cholesterol, transfer plasma cholesterol to the liver, and reduce lipid levels in the blood [11, 33]. SCFAs are produced from indigestible carbohydrates (including dietary fiber, resistant starch, and oligosaccharides) in the intestine and are absorbed from the colon to the liver and surrounding tissues [24]. Previous studies have shown that the addition of Lactobacillus probiotics to the diet can induce the production of SCFA by regulating the intestinal microbiota [6264], and many commensal bacteria in the gut produce SCFAs, especially butyrate, acetate, and propionate, which have proved to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal diseases [65]. Acetic acid and propionate are mainly produced by Bacteroides, and propionate can especially reduce the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver and improve lipid metabolism [5]. A high-fat diet can substantially reduce the content of butyric acid, affect intestinal metabolism, and increase the incidence of inflammation [66]. Elevated levels of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the intestine can promote the content of SCFAs, lactic acid, and essential amino acids (tyrosine, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, and lysine), which proves the effect of specific Lactobacillus on intestinal flora [67]. Sodium propionate treatment can reduce the concentrations of butyric acid and valeric acid to normal levels in HFD-fed mice, increase the number of Bacteroides, reduce the number of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Firmicutes, restore serum LPS concentrations to normal levels, regulate the intestinal bacteria group, and can effectively resist lipid disorders caused by HFD [68].

Most of the current treatment strategies for hyperlipidemia are a combination of lipid-lowering drugs and lifestyle changes, especially diets that limit fats and carbohydrates to reduce plasma lipid levels. The role of the gut microbiota provides early evidence for replacement or supplementation of existing treatments.

3.2. Gut Microbiota Affects Lipid Metabolism-Related Genes and the Signaling Pathway

Although lipid metabolism disorders are linked to lifestyle and other related metabolic diseases, such as overweight, obesity, or diabetes, some hyperlipidemia are caused by genetic changes [16]. Junjie Qi and his colleagues used Illumina GA short-read-based sequencing of total fecal DNA from 124 individuals from Europe to create 3.3 million nonredundant microbial genes, which contained the vast majority of human intestinal microorganism gene [7].

One of the main goals of reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease is LDL-C [22]. Kasahara et al. [14] found that compared with conventional mice, the expression of the LDL receptor (LDL-R) in the liver of germ-free (GF) mice is suppressed, the LDL-R gene is regulated by SREBP-2 (sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 2), and the expression of SREBP-2 is downregulated in germ-free mice and causes elevated plasma LDL levels, suggesting a beneficial effect of the gut microbiota. Shen et al. [46] found that Akkermansia muciniphila protects the host from acute and chronic hyperlipidemia by enhancing the expression of low-density lipoprotein receptors and Apolipoprotein E(APO-E). It can be seen that LDL-R signaling is essential in mediating the effect of reducing triglycerides in mice, decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease. Stepankova et al. [69] found that germ-free (GF) conditions accelerated the development of atherosclerosis in Apo-E-deficient mice fed a low-cholesterol diet. However, the difference in atherosclerotic plaques in GF and traditional Apo-E-deficient mice on a high-cholesterol diet is not obvious. Changing the composition of bacteria through a specific diet or regulating the formation of microbial metabolites may have a long-term impact on the development of cardiovascular diseases.

The ABCG5/8 gene encodes a heterodimer transporter that promotes the efficient secretion of cholesterol from liver cells to bile, reducing cholesterol levels. Enterococcus faecalis ATCC19433 increases the content of ABCG5 and ABCG8, which can reduce the cholesterol content of the liver and the weight of the liver. The mechanism may be that ABCG5 and ABCG8 can inhibit the absorption of sterols and promote the excretion of biliary sterols [38]. Yet, another study is the opposite. F. Briand fed hypercholesterolemia hamsters with Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745, and CNCM I-745 significantly reduced the expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 in hypercholesterolemia and increased the expression of HMG CoA-R gene (encoding a rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis). However, total cholesterol in plasma decreased significantly and total stool cholesterol increased () [40]. In general, although the pathways are different, the overall effect is the same, and the specific mechanism of specific strains needs further research (Figure 2).

Enterococcus faecalis ATCC19433 increases the content of ABCG5 and ABCG8, and ABCG5 and ABCG8 can inhibit the absorption of sterols and promote the excretion of biliary sterols. Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 significantly reduced the expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 in hypercholesterolemia and increased the expression of HMG CoA-R gene. Both total cholesterol in plasma decreased significantly.

Another important regulator of triglyceride and cholesterol homeostasis is the FXR [70]. The Farnesoid-X-Receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor [71], and bile acid acts as a ligand to bind and activate the FXR, leading to the release of fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15) [58]. Kasahara et al. found that the lack of intestinal microbiota in Apo-E-deficient mice caused significant increases in plasma and liver cholesterol levels, which may be related to the upregulation of FXR expression in the terminal ileum of GF mice. The upregulation of the FXR leads to an increase in the expression of FGF15, and FGF15 leads to the upregulation of the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) in the liver. FGF15 binds to FGFR4 in hepatocytes and inhibits the expression of CYP7A1 gene, reduces the total bile acid content in the liver, and leads to an increase in liver cholesterol levels [14]. Therefore, the lack of intestinal microbiota changes the distribution of bile acids, which may stimulate the liver and intestine FGF15/FGFR4 axis, reduce the expression of liver CYP7A1, the synthesis of bile acids, and the catabolism of cholesterol, leading to an increase in liver cholesterol levels. Previous studies have found that probiotics downregulate FXR, leading to increased liver bile acid synthesis in mice [72]. An intestine-selective FXR inhibitor can improve obesity and metabolic syndrome in HFD-induced obese mice [73]. From the abovementioned content, it can be inferred that inhibiting the intestinal FXR may be a reasonable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of human metabolic disorders (Figure 1).

The gut microbiota alters fat storage by regulating the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) inhibitor Fiaf [74]. Fiaf is related to the deposition of triglycerides in adipocytes, and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ(PPAR) is involved in microbially induced Fiaf expression. The increase in Fiaf is related to the increase in gene expression that regulates cholesterol metabolism [65]. Decreased expression of PPAR-regulated genes in the intestine after colonization by Lactobacillus paracasei and E. Coli is involved in intracellular levels of free fatty acids (FFAs) [10]. FFAs are lipid substances released from adipose tissue and various cells after lipid breakdown. Javier Rodríguez-Carrio et al. [75] demonstrated that the intestinal abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila is the principal predictor of serum total FFA levels and is inversely connected with total FFA and the proinflammatory factor IL-6.

Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) is a transmembrane protein that participated in cholesterol absorption [53]. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4a) is a cholesterol-dependent signal that plays a vital role in the regulation of NPC1L1. Silvia Falcinelli and others fed L. rhamnosus lactobacillus to hyperlipidemia model mice which reduced the expression of HNF4a gene and, then, downregulated NPC1L1, resulting in a decrease in cholesterol content. L. rhamnosus also affects triglycerides hydrolysis through the regulation of MGLL and the gene encoding transmembrane protein (FIT2). This indicates that probiotics reduce the transcription of genes related to cholesterol metabolism, but the level of transcription gets nothing to do with dietary fat content [76]. A previous study showed that, after the addition of probiotics, the MGLL gene expression level in the gallbladder increased, and the triglycerides content decreased, further proving the role of probiotics [11].

4. Conclusions

More and more studies have discovered the importance of gut microbiota and probiotic intake in lipid metabolism disorders. Changes in the structure of gut microbiota can affect atherosclerosis, obesity, and diabetes. Researchers have discovered many mechanisms about gut microbiota, including biological mechanisms, genes, and signaling pathways. In addition, probiotics have a potential role in the gut microbiota and can regulate lipid metabolism, obesity, and insulin resistance in the body to varying degrees. In future research, more attention should be given to the research of specific strain mechanisms to make the treatment more individual. Therefore, the use of probiotics in humans needs to be validated in the long-term, large-scale population.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

Chong-ge You and Yan-jun He conceived and designed the manuscript. All authors contributed to writing of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CY2018-MS10), Science and Technology Plan Project of Gansu (18YF1FA108), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81560343).

References

  1. B. Isomaa, P. Almgren, T. Tuomi et al., “Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes Care, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 683–689, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Yusuf, S. Hawken, S. Ôunpuu et al., “Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9438, pp. 937–952, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. C. R. Thumu and P. M. Halami, “In vivo safety assessment of Lactobacillus fermentum strains, evaluation of their cholesterol lowering ability and intestinal microbial modulation,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 705–713, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Kikuchi, M. Ben Othman, and K. Sakamoto, “Sterilized bifidobacteria suppressed fat accumulation and blood glucose level,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 501, no. 4, pp. 1041–1047, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Li, C. Qi, H. Zhu et al., “Lactobacillus reuteri improves gut barrier function and affects diurnal variation of the gut microbiota in mice fed a high-fat diet,” Food & Function, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 4705–4715, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Backhed, “Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5717, pp. 1915–1920, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Qin, R. Li, J. Raes et al., “A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 59–65, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. L. Simon and S. L. Gorbach, “Intestinal flora in health and disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 174–193, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Gózd-Barszczewska, M. Kozioł-Montewka, P. Barszczewski, A. Młodzińska, and K. Humińska, “Gut microbiome as a biomarker of cardiometabolic disorders,” Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 416–422, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Tazi, “Disentangling host-microbiota regulation of lipid secretion by enterocytes: insights from commensals lactobacillus paracasei and Escherichia coli,” MBio, vol. 9, no. 5, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Falcinelli, “Lactobacillus rhamnosus lowers zebrafish lipid content by changing gut microbiota and host transcription of genes involved in lipid metabolism,” Scientific Report, vol. 5, p. 9336, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Kim, “Lactobacillus plantarum LC27 and bifidobacterium longum LC67 simultaneously alleviate high-fat diet-induced colitis, endotoxemia, liver steatosis, and obesity in mice,” Nutrition Research, vol. 67, pp. 78–89, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. B. Kannel, “Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease-six-year follow-up experience,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Kasahara, T. Tanoue, T. Yamashita et al., “Commensal bacteria at the crossroad between cholesterol homeostasis and chronic inflammation in atherosclerosis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 519–528, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Martinez-Guryn, N. Hubert, K. Frazier et al., “Small intestine microbiota regulate host digestive and absorptive adaptive responses to dietary lipids,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 458–469, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. B. Granado-Serrano, “Faecal bacterial and short-chain fatty acids signature in hypercholesterolemia,” Scientific Report, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1772, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. A. David, C. F. Maurice, R. N. Carmody et al., “Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome,” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7484, pp. 559–563, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Ni, “Late-night eating-induced physiological dysregulation and circadian misalignment are accompanied by microbial dysbiosis,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 63, no. 24, Article ID e1900867, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Bo, “Relative variations of gut microbiota in disordered cholesterol metabolism caused by high-cholesterol diet and host genetics,” Microbiologyopen, vol. 6, no. 4, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Zeng, H. Cui, D. Tang et al., “Short-term dietary restriction in old mice rejuvenates the aging-induced structural imbalance of gut microbiota,” Biogerontology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 837–848, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Wang, X. Yu, Y. Li et al., “Bifidobacterium bifidum TMC3115 can characteristically influence glucose and lipid profile and intestinal microbiota in the middle-aged and elderly,” Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1182–1194, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Costabile, “An in vivo assessment of the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of lactobacillus plantarum ECGC 13110402 in normal to mildly hypercholesterolaemic adults,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 12, Article ID e0187964, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Haro, “Intestinal microbiota is influenced by gender and body mass index,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, Article ID e0154090, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Fu, M. J. Bonder, M. C. Cenit et al., “The gut microbiome contributes to a substantial proportion of the variation in blood lipids,” Circulation Research, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 817–824, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Shimizu, “Meta-analysis: effects of probiotic supplementation on lipid profiles in normal to mildly hypercholesterolemic individuals,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, Article ID e0139795, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Hill, F. Guarner, G. Reid et al., “The International scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 506–514, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Markowiak and K. Śliżewska, “Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 9, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. He and B. Shi, “Gut microbiota as a potential target of metabolic syndrome: the role of probiotics and prebiotics,” Cell Bioscience, vol. 7, p. 54, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Chen, Z. Yang, X. Chen et al., “Effect of lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301 on the gut microbiota and lipid metabolism in rats fed a high-fat diet,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 687–695, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J.-H. Shin, M. H. Nam, H. Lee et al., “Amelioration of obesity-related characteristics by a probiotic formulation in a high-fat diet-induced obese rat model,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2081–2090, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Salazar, “Functional effects of EPS-producing bifidobacterium administration on energy metabolic alterations of diet-induced obese mice,” Frontiers Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 1809, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Wang, “Live probiotic lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance and lowers fat deposition by improving lipid metabolism, intestinal development, and gut microflora in broilers,” Frontiers Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 1073, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Falcinelli, “Influence of probiotics administration on gut microbiota core: a review on the effects on appetite control, glucose, and lipid metabolism,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 52, no. Suppl 1, pp. S50–s56, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  34. S. Park, “Cholesterol-lowering effect of lactobacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 and its influence on the gut microbiome and propionate level in a murine model,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, Article ID e0203150, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H.-S. Lye, T. Kato, W.-Y. Low et al., “Lactobacillus fermentum FTDC 8312 combats hypercholesterolemia via alteration of gut microbiota,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 262, pp. 75–83, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Liu, F. Zhao, J. Liu et al., “Selection of cholesterol-lowering lactic acid bacteria and its effects on rats fed with high-cholesterol diet,” Current Microbiology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 623–631, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. E. Ichim, A. N. Patel, and K. A. Shafer, “Experimental support for the effects of a probiotic/digestive enzyme supplement on serum cholesterol concentrations and the intestinal microbiome,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 184, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Zhu, T. Li, A. U. Din, A. Hassan, Y. Wang, and G. Wang, “Beneficial effects of Enterococcus faecalis in hypercholesterolemic mice on cholesterol transportation and gut microbiota,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 3181–3191, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Singhal, “Serotonin transporter deficiency is associated with dysbiosis and changes in metabolic function of the mouse intestinal microbiome,” Scientific Report, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2138, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. Briand, T. Sulpice, P. Giammarinaro, and X. Roux, “Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 changes lipidemic profile and gut microbiota in a hamster hypercholesterolemic model,” Beneficial Microbes, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 555–567, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Ataie-Jafari, B. Larijani, H. Alavi Majd, and F. Tahbaz, “Cholesterol-lowering effect of probiotic yogurt in comparison with ordinary yogurt in mildly to moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Z. Mazloom, A. Yousefinejad, and M. H. Dabbaghmanesh, “Effect of probiotics on lipid profile, glycemic control, insulin action, oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a clinical trial,” Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  43. G. R. Gibson and M. B. Roberfroid, “Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 1401–1412, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. E. Roopchand, R. N. Carmody, P. Kuhn et al., “Dietary polyphenols promote growth of the gut BacteriumAkkermansia muciniphilaand attenuate high-fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 2847–2858, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. Zhang, R. N. Carmody, H. M. Kalariya et al., “Grape proanthocyanidin-induced intestinal bloom of akkermansia muciniphila is dependent on its baseline abundance and precedes activation of host genes related to metabolic health,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 56, pp. 142–151, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Shen, X. Tong, N. Sud et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor signaling mediates the triglyceride-lowering action of Akkermansia muciniphila in genetic-induced hyperlipidemia,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1448–1456, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. C. Nicolucci, M. P. Hume, I. Martínez, S. Mayengbam, J. Walter, and R. A. Reimer, “Prebiotics reduce body fat and alter intestinal microbiota in children who are overweight or with obesity,” Gastroenterology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 711–722, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. D. Cani, E. Lecourt, E. M. Dewulf et al., “Gut microbiota fermentation of prebiotics increases satietogenic and incretin gut peptide production with consequences for appetite sensation and glucose response after a meal,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1236–1243, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Everard, V. Lazarevic, N. Gaïa et al., “Microbiome of prebiotic-treated mice reveals novel targets involved in host response during obesity,” The ISME Journal, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2116–2130, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. F. de Cossío, C. Fourrier, J. Sauvant et al., “Impact of prebiotics on metabolic and behavioral alterations in a mouse model of metabolic syndrome,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 64, pp. 33–49, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Gérard, “Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota,” Pathogens, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. E. Gilliland, C. R. Nelson, and C. Maxwell, “Assimilation of cholesterol by lactobacillus acidophilus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 377–381, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. L. G. Dimova, “High-cholesterol diet does not alter gut microbiota composition in mice,” Nutrition & Metabolism (Lond), vol. 14, p. 15, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. T. Lan, J. Haywood, and P. A. Dawson, “Inhibition of ileal apical but not basolateral bile acid transport reduces atherosclerosis in apoE−/−mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 374–380, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. Thomas, R. Pellicciari, M. Pruzanski, J. Auwerx, and K. Schoonjans, “Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 678–693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. Parasar, H. Zhou, X. Xiao, Q. Shi, I. L. Brito, and P. V. Chang, “Chemoproteomic profiling of gut microbiota-associated bile salt hydrolase activity,” ACS Central Science, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 867–873, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  57. Ö. Öner, B. Aslim, and S. B. Aydas, “Mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering effects of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains as potential probiotics with theirbsh gene analysis,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Baars, “Sex differences in lipid metabolism are affected by presence of the gut microbiota,” Scientific Report, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 13426, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Begley, C. Hill, and C. G. M. Gahan, “Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1729–1738, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Heinken, “Systematic assessment of secondary bile acid metabolism in gut microbes reveals distinct metabolic capabilities in inflammatory bowel disease,” Microbiome, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 75, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. H. Cao, M. Xu, W. Dong et al., “Secondary bile acid-induced dysbiosis promotes intestinal carcinogenesis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 140, no. 11, pp. 2545–2556, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. C. Huang, “Effects of tempeh fermentation with lactobacillus plantarum and rhizopus oligosporus on streptozotocin-induced type II diabetes mellitus in rats,” Nutrients, vol. 10, no. 9, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. R. Nagpal, “Human-origin probiotic cocktail increases short-chain fatty acid production via modulation of mice and human gut microbiome,” Scientific Report, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 12649, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Wang, Y. Guo, H. Chen, H. Wei, and C. Wan, “Potential of lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 and bifidobacterium bifidum WBIN03 in relieving colitis by gut microbiota, immune, and anti-oxidative stress,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 327–337, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. Lukovac, “Differential modulation by akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii of host peripheral lipid metabolism and histone acetylation in mouse gut organoids,” MBio, vol. 5, no. 4, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. Maciejewska, K Skonieczna-Zydecka, A Lukomska et al., “The short chain fatty acids and lipopolysaccharides status in sprague-dawley rats fed with high-fat and high-cholesterol diet,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology: An Official Journal of the Polish Physiological Society, vol. 69, no. 2, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  67. C. I. Le Roy, J. Štšepetova, E. Sepp, E. Songisepp, S. P. Claus, and M. Mikelsaar, “New insights into the impact of Lactobacillus population on host-bacteria metabolic interplay,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 30545–30556, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. B. Song, Y. Z. Zhong, C. B. Zheng, F. N. Li, Y. H. Duan, and J. P. Deng, “Propionate alleviates high‐fat diet‐induced lipid dysmetabolism by modulating gut microbiota in mice,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1546–1555, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. R. Stepankova, Z. Tonar, J. Bartova et al., “Absence of microbiota (germ-free conditions) accelerates the atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice fed standard low cholesterol diet,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 796–804, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. G. S. Raza, “Polydextrose changes the gut microbiome and attenuates fasting triglyceride and cholesterol levels in Western diet fed mice,” Scientific Report, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5294, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. B. M. Forman, E. Goode, J. Chen et al., “Identification of a nuclear receptor that is activated by farnesol metabolites,” Cell, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 687–693, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. Degirolamo, S. Rainaldi, F. Bovenga, S. Murzilli, and A. Moschetta, “Microbiota modification with probiotics induces hepatic bile acid synthesis via downregulation of the Fxr-Fgf15 axis in mice,” Cell Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. Jiang, “Intestine-selective farnesoid X receptor inhibition improves obesity-related metabolic dysfunction,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, Article ID 10166, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. W. F. Janssen, W. Dijk, J. Boekhorst et al., “ANGPTL4 promotes bile acid absorption during taurocholic acid supplementation via a mechanism dependent on the gut microbiota,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1862, no. 10, pp. 1056–1067, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Rodriguez-Carrio, “Free fatty acids profiles are related to gut microbiota signatures and short-chain fatty acids,” Frontiers Immunology, vol. 8, p. 823, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. Falcinelli, “Dietary lipid content reorganizes gut microbiota and probiotic L. rhamnosus attenuates obesity and enhances catabolic hormonal milieu in zebrafish,” Scintific Report, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5512, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Yan-Jun He and Chong-Ge You. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views146
Downloads49
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.