Applying Hotspot Detection Methods in Forestry: A Case Study of Chestnut Oak Regeneration

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Method</td><td align="center">SaTScan</td><td align="center">ClusterSeer</td><td align="center">CART</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">SaTScan</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">50.0</td><td align="center">55.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left">ClusterSeer</td><td align="center">50.0</td><td align="center">—</td><td align="center">44.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left">CART</td><td align="center">55.6</td><td align="center">44.4</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Percentage of common hotspots identified by different methods.

International Journal of Forestry Research

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Applying Hotspot Detection Methods in Forestry: A Case Study of Chestnut Oak Regeneration 