Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Forestry Research
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 295414, 12 pages
Research Article

Afforestation for the Provision of Multiple Ecosystem Services: A Ukrainian Case Study

1Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK
2Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
3Environmental Network Ltd., The Hillocks, Tarland, Aboyne AB34 4TJ, Scotland, UK

Received 28 March 2011; Revised 21 August 2011; Accepted 30 August 2011

Academic Editor: Frits Mohren

Copyright © 2012 Maria Nijnik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report, 2005,
  2. C. Folke, J. Colding, and F. Berkes, “Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems,” in Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, Eds., pp. 352–387, Cambridge University Press, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  3. European Commission (EC), Environmental Policy Review: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament COM, vol. 195. Brussels, Belgium, 2007,
  4. M. Kaljonen, E. Primmer, G. De Blust, M. Nijnik, and M. Kulvik, “Multifunctionality and biodiversity conservation—institutional challenges,” in Nature Conservation Management: From Idea to Practical Issues, T. Chmelievski, Ed., pp. 53–69, Helsinki-Aarhus, Lublin, Poland, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Nijnik, L. Zahvoyska, A. Nijnik, and A. Ode, “Public evaluation of landscape content and change,” Land Use Policy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Mather, G. Hill, and M. Nijnik, “Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization?” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 441–455, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. T. Dana, “Multiple use, biology and economics,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 41, pp. 625–627, 1943. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. A. Pearson, “Multiple use in forestry,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 42, pp. 243–249, 1944. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. R. Vincent and C. S. Binkley, “Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization,” Land Economics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 370–376, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. D. Bowes and J. V. Krutilla, The Multiple-Use Economics of Public Forest lands: Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  11. R. Sedjo, “Transgenic trees and trade problems on the horizon,” Resources, vol. 155, pp. 9–13, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Gensiruk and S. Ivanytsky, Forest Management and Setting up a Proper Share of Forest Cover, Lviv Publisher, L'viv, Ukraine, 1999.
  13. European Environmental Agency (EEA), “Europe's ecological backbone: recognising the true value of our mountains,” EEA Report 6/2010, p. 248, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Fazey, J. Gamarra, J. Fischer, M. Reed, L. Stringer, and M. Christie, “Adaptation strategies for reducing vulnerability to future environmental change,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 414–422, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Carnus, J. Parrotta, E. Brockerhoff et al., “Planted forests and biodiversity,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 65–77, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Buttoud, “Multipurpose management of mountain forests: which approaches?” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Weiss, “The political practice of mountain forest restoration—comparing restoration concepts in four European countries,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 195, no. 1-2, pp. 1–13, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. G. Borges, A. Falcão, C. Miragaia, P. Marques, and M. Marques, “A decision support system for forest resources management in Portugal,” in System Analysis in Forest Resources, G. J. Arthaud and T. M. Barrett, Eds., vol. 7 of Managing Forest Ecosystems, pp. 155–164, Kluwer Academic, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. K. M. Reynolds, M. Twery, M. J. Lexer et al., “Decision support systems in natural resource management,” in Handbook on Decision Support Systems, F. Burstein and C. Holsapple, Eds., vol. 2 of International Handbooks on Information Systems Series. Handbook on Decision Support System, pp. 499–534, Springer, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Gilliams, J. Van Orshoven, B. Muys, H. Kros, G. W. Heil, and W. Van Deursen, “AFFOREST sDSS: a metamodel based spatial decision support system for afforestation of agricultural land,” New Forests, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 33–53, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Verchot, R. Zomer, O. Van Straaten, and B. Muys, “Implications of country-level decisions on the specification of crown cover in the definition of forests for land area eligible for afforestation and reforestation activities in the CDM,” Climatic Change, vol. 81, no. 3-4, pp. 415–430, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Muys, J. Hynynen, M. Palahi et al., “Simulation tools for decision support to adaptive forest management in Europe,” Forest Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 86–99, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Eid and K. Hobbelstad, “AVVIRK-2000: a large-scale forestry scenario, model for long-term investment, income and harvest analyses,” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 472–482, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. The Stern Review, “The Economic of Climate Change,” 2006,
  25. M. Nijnik, “Carbon capture and storage in forests,” in Carbon Capture: Sequestration and Storage, R. E. Hester and R. M. Harrison, Eds., vol. 29 of Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, pp. 203–238, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. F. Schmithüsen, “Multifunctional forestry practices as a land use strategy to meet increasing private and public demands in modern societies,” Journal of Forest Science, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 290–298, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. G. C. van Kooten, Climate Change Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2004.
  28. M. Nijnik and L. Bizikova, “Responding to the kyoto protocol through forestry: a comparison of opportunities for several countries in Europe,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 257–269, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Anderson, “Economic aspects of afforestation and soil conservation projects,” The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 100–110, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Phillips, Secure Resource Supply for the European Wood Industry, Inventory scenarios for timber resources in Ireland. COST E44 workshop, Dublin, Ireland, 2006.
  31. M. Michetti and R. Nunes, Afforestation and Timber Management Compliance Strategies in Climate Policy. A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis, vol. 2011.004 of FEEM Note di lavoro, 2011.
  32. M. Lindner, M. Maroschek, S. Netherer et al., “Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 259, no. 4, pp. 698–709, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Nabuurs, R. Paivinen, and H. Schanz, “Sustainable management regimes for Europe's forests—a projection with EFISCEN until 2050,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 155–173, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Nabuurs, R. Paivinen, M. J. Schelhaas et al., “Nature-oriented forest management in Europe: modeling the long-term effects,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 28–34, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Shvidenko and Andrusishin, Ukraine: The Conditions and Prospects of the Forest Sector, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1998, Unpublished manuscript.
  36. State Committee of Forestry of Ukraine (SCF), State Records. Kyiv, 2007,
  37. I. Soloviy, “New forests for Europe: afforestation at the turn of century,” in Proceedings of the EFI, vol. 35 of Afforestation in Ukraine—potential and restrictions, pp. 195–211, February 2000.
  38. A. Strochinskii, Y. Pozyvailo, and S. E. Jungst, “Forests and forestry in Ukraine: standing on the brink of a market economy,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 34–38, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Gensiruk and M. Nijnik, Geography of Forests in Ukraine, Lviv Publisher, L'viv, Ukraine, 1995.
  40. M. Nijnik and G. C. Van Kooten, “Forestry in the Ukraine: the road ahead?” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. The President's Decree aimed to reform the forestry sector of Ukraine, 2004,
  42. The State Programme, “Forests in Ukraine, 2002–2015,” Kyiv, Ukraine, 2002,
  43. The Forest Code of Ukraine, 2006,
  44. M. Nijnik, To sustainability in forestry: the Ukraine's case, Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, 2002.
  45. FAO, Forstat, 2010,
  46. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MENR), “The National Report. Kyiv,” 2003,
  47. National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Ukraine: the Prognosis for the Development of Production Forces, Kyiv, 2002.
  48. R. Bun, M. Gusti, L. Kujii et al., “Spatial GHG inventory: analysis of uncertainty sources. A case study for Ukraine,” in Accounting for Climate Change: Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories—Verification Compliance and Trading, D. Lieberman, M. Jonas, Z. Nahorski, and S. Nilsson, Eds., pp. 63–74, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Nilsson and A. Shvidenko, “The Ukrainian Forest Sector in a Global Perspective,” IR-99-011/March. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1999.
  50. N. Hanley and C. Spash, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, 1993.
  51. M. Nijnik, “Economics of climate change mitigation forest policy scenarios for Ukraine,” Climate Policy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 319–336, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. Van Kooten and E. Bulte, The Economics of Nature: Managing Biological Assets, Blackwell Publications, Oxford, UK, 2000.
  53. M. Nijnik, “To an economist's perception on sustainability in forestry-in-transition,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 403–413, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. P. Lakida, S. Nilsson, and A. Shvidenko, “Estimation of Forest Phytomass for Selected Countries of the Former European USSR,” WP-95-79, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1995.
  55. A. Jessome, “Strength and related properties of woods grown in Canada. Forestry,” Tech. Rep. 21, Ottawa, Canada, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  56. R. Sandor and J. Skees, “Creating a market for carbon emissions opportunities for US farmers,” Choices Quarter, vol. 1, pp. 13–18, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  57. S. Huq and H. Reid, “Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS bulletin,” Climate Change and Development, vol. 35, pp. 15–21, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  58. D. Klooster and O. Masera, “Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 259–272, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Naka, A. L. Hammett, and W. B. Stuart, “Forest certification: stakeholders, constraints and effects,” Local Environment, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 475–481, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. E. Fernandez, L. Rojo, M. N. Jimenez et al., “Afforestation improves soil fetiliyu in south-eastern Spain,” European Journal of Forest Research, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 707–717, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  61. M. Nijnik, B. Slee, and G. Pajot, “Opportunities and challenges for terrestrial carbon offsetting and marketing, with some implications for forestry in the UK,” South-East European Forestry Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69–79, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  62. S. Fankhauser and L. Lavric, “The investment climate for climate investment: joint Implementation in transition countries,” Climate Policy, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 417–434, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. E. Petkova and G. Faraday, “Good Practices in Policies and Measures for Climate Change Mitigation,” REC and WRI, Szentendre, Hungary, 2001.
  64. IBN-DLO, Resolving Issues on Terrestrial Biospheric Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol. Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Wageningen, The Netherlands,1999.
  65. R. N. Lubowski, A. J. Plantinga, and R. N. Stavins, “Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 135–152, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. G. Van Kooten, Land Resource Economics and Sustainable Development. Economic Policies and the Common Good, UBC Press, Toronto, Canada, 1993.
  67. J. Lampietti and J. Dixon, To See the Forest for the Trees: A Guide to non-Timber Forest Benefits, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
  68. P. Lakyda, I. Buksha, and V. Pasternak, “Opportunities for fulfilling Joint Implementation projects in forestry in Ukraine,” in Forest, Climate and Kyoto, vol. 222 of Unasylva, pp. 1–6, 2005. View at Google Scholar