Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Forestry Research
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 563021, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/563021
Research Article

A Step Prior to REDD+ Implementation: A Socioeconomic Study

Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, 2405 rue de la Terrasse, Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Quebec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6

Received 20 June 2014; Revised 31 July 2014; Accepted 14 August 2014; Published 1 September 2014

Academic Editor: Sunil Nautiyal

Copyright © 2014 Anne Bernard and Nancy Gélinas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. R. Van Der Werf, D. C. Morton, R. S. Defries et al., “CO2 emissions from forest loss,” Nature Geoscience, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 737–738, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Karsenty and S. Ongolo, “Can “fragile states” decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 18, pp. 38–45, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), “Fragile States 2013: Resource flows and trends in a shifting world,” 2012.
  4. D. Pettenella and L. Brotto, “Governance features for successful REDD+ projects organization,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 18, pp. 46–52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. O. Springate-Baginski and E. Wollenberg, REDD, Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods: The Emerging Agenda, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 2010.
  6. A. Awono, O. A. Somorin, R. Eba'a Atyi, and P. Levang, “Tenure and participation in local REDD+ projects: insights from Southern Cameroon,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 35, pp. 76–86, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Agrawal, A. Chhatre, and R. Hardin, “Changing governance of the world's forests,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5882, pp. 1460–1462, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Stern, Key elements of a Global deal on Climate Change, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 2008.
  9. A. Angelsen and S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, “What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options?” in Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications, A. Angelsen, Ed., pp. 11–21, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Aquino and B. Guay, “Implementing REDD + in the Democratic Republic of Congo: an analysis of the emerging national REDD + governance structure,” Forest Policy and Economics, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. K. Rudel, L. Schneider, and M. Uriarte, “Forest transitions: an introduction,” Land Use Policy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 95–97, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. B. Barbier, J. C. Burgess, and A. Grainger, “The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework,” Land Use Policy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 98–107, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Blom, T. Sunderland, and D. Murdiyarso, “Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects,” Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 164–172, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Observatoire des forêts d’Afrique centrale (OFAC), “États des Forêts 2010: Les forêts du Bassin du Congo,” 2010.
  15. “Ministère de l’Environnement, Conservation de la Nature et Tourisme RDC (MECNT),” Synthèse des études sur les causes de la déforestation et de la dégradation des forêts en République Démocratique du Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2012.
  16. E. A. Ellis and L. Porter-Bolland, “Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 256, no. 11, pp. 1971–1983, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Estrada, E. Trines, and I. Emmer, Comparative Study on REDD+: Recommandations for Action, vol. 78, Sylvestrum, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, 2012.
  18. A. Lubini, La Réserve de biosphère de Luki, MAB, DECNT, Kinshasa, Congo, 1984.
  19. Z. Mogba and M. Freudenberger, “Migration humaine dans les zones protégées d’Afrique centrale: Le cas de la Réserve special Dzanga -Sangha,” Yale F&ES Bulletin, vol. 102, pp. 113–139, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  20. Congo Basin Forest Fund (CBFF), Projet pilote REDD intégré autour de la Réserve de biosphère de Luki dans la forêt du Mayombe, BAD, 2010.
  21. M. Nyange, Participation des communautés locales et gestion durable des forêts: Cas de la Réserve de biosphere de Luki en République Démocratique du Congo [Ph.D. thesis], Laval University and Kinshasa University, 2014.
  22. FAO, Guide d’application niveau terrain: programme d’analyse socioéconomique selon le genre, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2002.
  23. R. Chambers, “Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): challenges, potentials and paradigm,” World Development, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1437–1454, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Özerdem and R. Bowd, Participatory Research Methodologies: Development and Post-Disaster Conflict Reconstruction, Ashgate Publishing, 2010.
  25. K. Krippendorff, “Content analysis,” in International Encyclopedia of Communications, E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth and, and L. Gross, Eds., pp. 403–407, The Annenberg School of Communications, University of Pennsylvania, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. Khasa, La Boîte à Images: Les Changements Climatiques en Afrique Centrale, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, 2002.
  27. W. D. Sunderlin, B. Belcher, L. Santoso et al., “Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview,” World Development, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1383–1402, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Albrecht and S. T. Kandji, “Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 99, no. 1-3, pp. 15–27, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards, “and Environmental Standards,” Version 2, 27, http://www.redd-standards.org/.
  30. V. M. Viana, A. R. Aquino, T. M. Pinto et al., REDD+ and Community Forestry: Lessons Learned from an Exchange of Brazilian experiences with Africa, The World Bank and Amazonas Sustainable Foundation, 2012.
  31. E. J. Z. Robinson, H. J. Albers, C. Meshack, and R. B. Lokina, “Implementing REDD through community-based forest management: lessons from Tanzania,” Natural Resources Forum, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 141–152, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Purnomo, G. S. Arum, R. Achdiawanm, and R. H. Irawati, “Rights and wellbeing: an analytical approach to global case comparison of community forestry,” Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 35–48, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  33. L. Porter-Bolland, E. A. Ellis, M. R. Guariguata, I. Ruiz-Mallén, S. Negrete-Yankelevich, and V. Reyes-García, “Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 268, pp. 6–17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. A. Coleman and F. D. Fleischman, “Comparing forest decentralization and local institutional change in Bolivia, Kenya, Mexico, and Uganda,” World Development, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 836–849, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus