Research Article

Thinning Intensity and Pruning Impacts on Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil

Table 2

Treatment significance (fixed effect) and pairwise comparisons among significant treatments for periodic increment in total height (PI); dominant height (PI); quadratic mean diameter (PIDMQ); basal area (PIBA); volume per hectare outside bark (PI ha−1); and volume per tree outside bark (PI tree−1). values < 0.05 are bolded.

InstallationVariable value for thinningPairwise comparisons value

BonfimPI<0.000120% versus 35%0.0077
20% versus 50%<0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0038
35% versus 50%0.0001
35% versus 35% + pruning0.7914
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0002
PI0.6087
PIQMD<0.000120% versus 35%0.0002
20% versus 50%<0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0001
35% versus 50%0.0001
35% versus 35% + pruning0.5154
50% versus 35% + pruning<0.0001
PI tree−1<0.000120% versus 35%0.0027
20% versus 50%<0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0033
35% versus 50%0.0007
35% versus 35% + pruning0.8961
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0006

TombadorPI0.031320% versus 35%0.0290
20% versus 50%0.0065
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0316
35% versus 50%0.2668
35% versus 35% + pruning0.9502
50% versus 35% + pruning0.2448
PI0.7942
PIQMD0.000520% versus 35%0.0033
20% versus 50%<0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0031
35% versus 50%0.0025
35% versus 35% + pruning0.9502
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0027
%PIBA ha−10.004620% versus 35%0.0162
20% versus 50%0.0007
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0152
35% versus 50%0.0233
35% versus 35% + pruning0.9620
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0249
ln%PI ha−1<0.000120% versus 35%<0.0001
20% versus 50%<0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning<0.0001
35% versus 50%0.0017
35% versus 35% + pruning0.7895
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0035
PI tree−10.001020% versus 35%0.0057
20% versus 50%0.0001
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0065
35% versus 50%0.0051
35% versus 35% + pruning0.9075
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0045

Lagoa do BuPI0.040220% versus 35%0.0208
20% versus 50%0.0097
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0618
35% versus 50%0.5904
35% versus 35% + pruning0.4727
50% versus 35% + pruning0.2279
PI0.9899
lnPIQMD0.1257
ln%PIB ha−10.0682
%PI ha−10.026320% versus 35%0.0626
20% versus 50%0.0044
20% versus 35% + pruning0.1279
35% versus 50%0.0963
35% versus 35% + pruning0.6416
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0471
PI tree−10.032220% versus 35%0.0311
20% versus 50%0.0097
20% versus 35% + pruning0.0365
35% versus 50%0.0798
35% versus 35% + pruning0.7880
50% versus 35% + pruning0.0650