International Journal of Forestry Research / 2015 / Article / Tab 2 / Research Article
Thinning Intensity and Pruning Impacts on Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil Table 2 Treatment significance (fixed effect) and pairwise comparisons among significant treatments for periodic increment in total height (PI
); dominant height (PI
); quadratic mean diameter (PIDMQ); basal area (PIBA); volume per hectare outside bark (PI
ha
−1 ); and volume per tree outside bark (PI
tree
−1 ).
values < 0.05 are bolded.
Installation Variable value for thinningPairwise comparisons valueBonfim PI <0.0001 20% versus 35% 0.0077 20% versus 50% <0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0038 35% versus 50% 0.0001 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.7914 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0002 PI 0.6087 PIQMD <0.0001 20% versus 35% 0.0002 20% versus 50% <0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0001 35% versus 50% 0.0001 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.5154 50% versus 35% + pruning <0.0001 PI tree−1 <0.0001 20% versus 35% 0.0027 20% versus 50% <0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0033 35% versus 50% 0.0007 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.8961 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0006 Tombador PI 0.0313 20% versus 35% 0.0290 20% versus 50% 0.0065 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0316 35% versus 50% 0.2668 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.9502 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.2448 PI 0.7942 PIQMD 0.0005 20% versus 35% 0.0033 20% versus 50% <0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0031 35% versus 50% 0.0025 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.9502 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0027 %PIBA ha−1 0.0046 20% versus 35% 0.0162 20% versus 50% 0.0007 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0152 35% versus 50% 0.0233 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.9620 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0249 ln%PI ha−1 <0.0001 20% versus 35% <0.0001 20% versus 50% <0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning <0.0001 35% versus 50% 0.0017 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.7895 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0035 PI tree−1 0.0010 20% versus 35% 0.0057 20% versus 50% 0.0001 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0065 35% versus 50% 0.0051 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.9075 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0045 Lagoa do Bu PI 0.0402 20% versus 35% 0.0208 20% versus 50% 0.0097 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0618 35% versus 50% 0.5904 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.4727 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.2279 PI 0.9899 lnPIQMD 0.1257 ln%PIB ha−1 0.0682 %PI ha−1 0.0263 20% versus 35% 0.0626 20% versus 50% 0.0044 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.1279 35% versus 50% 0.0963 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.6416 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0471 PI tree−1 0.0322 20% versus 35% 0.0311 20% versus 50% 0.0097 20% versus 35% + pruning 0.0365 35% versus 50% 0.0798 35% versus 35% + pruning 0.7880 50% versus 35% + pruning 0.0650