Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Forestry Research
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 878402, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/878402
Research Article

Biomass Modelling of Androstachys johnsonii Prain: A Comparison of Three Methods to Enforce Additivity

1Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Campus Universitário, Edifício No. 1, 257 Maputo, Mozambique
2Department of Forest and Wood Science, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa

Received 26 January 2015; Revised 23 March 2015; Accepted 5 April 2015

Academic Editor: Piermaria Corona

Copyright © 2015 Tarquinio Mateus Magalhães and Thomas Seifert. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. A. Cardoso, Madeiras de Moçambique: Androstachys johnsonii, Serviços de Agricultura e Serviços de Veterinária, Maputo, Mozambique, 1963.
  2. P. Leadley, H. M. Pereira, R. Alkemade et al., “Biodiversity scenarios: projections of 21st century change in biodiversity and associated ecosystem services,” Technical Series 50, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Brandeis, D. Matthew, L. Royer, and B. Parresol, “Allometric equations for predicting Puerto Rican dry forest biomass and volume,” in Proceedings of the 18th Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, pp. 197–202, 2006.
  4. B. R. Parresol, “Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons,” Forest Science, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 573–593, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Goicoa, A. F. Militino, and M. D. Ugarte, “Modelling aboveground tree biomass while achieving the additivity property,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 367–384, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. K. Repola, Modelling tree biomasses in Finland [Ph.D. thesis], University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2013.
  7. C. M. Litton, M. G. Ryan, D. B. Tinker, and D. H. Knight, “Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 351–363, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Kozak, “Methods for ensuring additivity of biomass components by regression analysis,” The Forestry Chronicle, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 402–405, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Cunia, “On tree biomass tables and regression: some statistical comments,” in Proceedings of the Forest Resource Inventory Workshop, W. E. Frawer, Ed., pp. 629–642, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, July 1979.
  10. T. Cunia and R. D. Briggs, “Forcing additivity of biomass tables: some empirical results,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 376–385, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Cunia and R. D. Briggs, “Forcing additivity of biomass tables: use of the generalized least squares method,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. W. Jacobs and T. Cunia, “Use of dummy variables to harmonize tree biomass tables,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 483–490, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. R. Parresol, “Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 865–878, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. P. Carvalho and B. R. Parresol, “Additivity in tree biomass components of Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.),” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 179, no. 1–3, pp. 269–276, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Mantilla and R. Timane, Orientação para maneio de mecrusse, SymfoDesign, Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  16. DINAGECA, Mapa Digital de Uso e Cobertura de Terra, CENACARTA, Maputo, Mozambique, 1990.
  17. MAE, Perfil do Distrito de Chibuto, Província de Gaza, MAE, Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  18. MAE, Perfil do Distrito de Mandhlakaze, Província de Gaza, MAE, Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  19. MAE, Perfil do Distrito de Panda, Província de Inhambane, MAE, Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  20. MAE, Perfil do Distrito de Funhalouro, Província de Inhambane, MAE, Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  21. MAE, Perfil do distrito de Mabote, provincia de Inhambane, MAE, Maputo, Moçambique, 2005.
  22. FAO, FAO Map of World Soil Resources, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2003.
  23. M.-C. Lambert, C.-H. Ung, and F. Raulier, “Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1996–2018, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. R. Parresol and C. E. Thomas, “Econometric modeling of sweetgum stem biomass using the IML and SYSLIN procedures,” in Proceedings of the 16th Annual SAS User's Group International Conference, pp. 694–699, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 1991.
  25. G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, 8th edition, 1989. View at MathSciNet
  26. R. D. Yanai, J. J. Battles, A. D. Richardson, C. A. Blodgett, D. M. Wood, and E. B. Rastetter, “Estimating uncertainty in ecosystem budget calculations,” Ecosystems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 239–248, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. A. Gier, Forest Mensuration (Fundamentals), International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands, 1992.
  28. B. Husch, T. W. Beers, and J. A. Kershaw Jr., Forest Mensuration, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2003.
  29. M. A. M. Brasil, R. A. A. Veiga, and J. L. Timoni, “Erros na determinação da densidade básica da madeira,” CERNE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–57, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Bunster, Commercial Timbers of Mozambique, Technological Catalogue, Traforest, Maputo, Mozambique, 2006.
  31. T. Seifert and S. Seifert, “Modelling and simulation of tree biomass,” in Bioenergy from Wood: Sustainable Production in the Tropics, T. Seifert, Ed., vol. 26 of Managing Forest Ecosystems, pp. 43–65, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.
  33. SAS Institute, SAS/ETS User's Guide, Version 8, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 1999.
  34. V. K. Srivastava and D. E. A. Giles, Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations Models: Estimation and Inference, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at MathSciNet
  35. W. H. Greene, Econometric Analysis, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1989.
  36. D. Bhattacharya, “Seemingly unrelated regressions with identical regressors: a note,” Economics Letters, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 247–255, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. P. Carvalho, “Uso da propriedade da aditividade de componentes de biomassa individual de Quercus pyrenaica Willd. com rescurso a um sistema de equações não linear,” Silva Lusitana, vol. 11, pp. 141–152, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  38. K. V. Gadow and G. Y. Hui, Modelling Forest Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.
  39. H. A. Meyer, A Correction for a Systematic Errors Occurring in the Application of the Logarithmic Volume Equation, Forestry School Research, State College, Pa, USA, 1941.
  40. T. M. Magalhães, Calibration of commercial volume and form factor tables for Androstachys johnsonii for Madeiraarte concession in Changanine-Memo villages [M.S. thesis], University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
  41. R. Ruiz-Peinado, M. del Rio, and G. Montero, “New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species,” Forest Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 176–188, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. J. Návar-Cháidez, N. G. Barrientos, J. J. G. Luna, V. Dale, and B. Parresol, “Additive biomass equations for pine species of forest plantations of Durango, Mexico,” Madera y Bosques, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 17–28, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  43. S. M. Salis, M. A. Assis, P. P. Mattos, and A. C. S. Pião, “Estimating the aboveground biomass and wood volume of savanna woodlands in Brazil's Pantanal wetlands based on allometric correlations,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 228, no. 1–3, pp. 61–68, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. T. Ter-Mikaelian and M. D. Korzukhin, “Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. Schroeder, S. Brown, J. Mo, R. Birdsey, and C. Cieszewski, “Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data,” Forest Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 424–434, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. D. Pardé, “Forest biomass,” Forest Abstracts, vol. 41, pp. 343–362, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  47. J. Repola, “Biomass equations for birch in Finland,” Silva Fennica, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 605–624, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. M. Magalhães and S. J. Soto, Relatório de Inventário Florestal da Concessão Florestal de Madeiraarte: Bases para a elaboração do plano de maneio de conservação dos recursos naturais, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal (DEF), Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (UEM), Maputo, Mozambique, 2005.
  49. S. Moura, D. Abella, and O. Anjos, “Evaluation of wood basic density as an indirect measurement of the volume of wood raw material,” in Proceedings of the Wood Science and Engineering in the Third Millennium (ICWSE '07), pp. 72–78, Brașov, Romania, June 2007.
  50. L. A. Simpson and A. F. M. Barton, “Determination of the fibre saturation point in whole wood using differential scanning calorimetry,” Wood Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 301–308, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C. R. Sanquetta, A. P. D. Corte, and F. Da Silva, “Biomass expansion factor and root-to-shoot ratio for Pinus in Brazil,” Carbon Balance and Management, vol. 6, article 6, pp. 1–8, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. E. Levy, S. E. Hale, and B. C. Nicoll, “Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain,” Forestry, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 421–430, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. N. Soethe, J. Lehmann, and C. Engels, “Root tapering between branching points should be included in fractal root system analysis,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 207, no. 2–4, pp. 363–366, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. Kalliokoski, P. Nygren, and R. Sievänen, “Coarse root architecture of three boreal tree species growing in mixed stands,” Silva Fennica, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 189–210, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. K. I. Paul, S. H. Roxburgh, J. R. England et al., “Root biomass of carbon plantings in agricultural landscapes of southern Australia: development and testing of allometrics,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 318, pp. 216–227, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. M. Ryan, M. Williams, and J. Grace, “Above- and belowground carbon stocks in a miombo woodland landscape of mozambique,” Biotropica, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 423–432, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Bolte, T. Rahmann, M. Kuhr, P. Pogoda, D. Murach, and K. V. Gadow, “Relationships between tree dimension and coarse root biomass in mixed stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.),” Plant and Soil, vol. 264, no. 1-2, pp. 1–11, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. W. A. Mugasha, T. Eid, O. M. Bollandsås et al., “Allometric models for prediction of above- and belowground biomass of trees in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 310, pp. 87–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Kuyah, J. Dietz, C. Muthuri et al., “Allometric equations for estimating biomass in agricultural landscapes: II. Belowground biomass,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 158, pp. 225–234, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. Niiyama, T. Kajimoto, Y. Matsuura et al., “Estimation of root biomass based on excavation of individual root systems in a primary dipterocarp forest in Pasoh Forest Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia,” Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 271–284, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus