Research Article

Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya

Table 1

Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of sampled households ().

Variable Location
Kapsimbeywo Silibwet Kapkembu Nessuit MariashoniSig (LSD)

Gender (HH) %
 Male 73.3 85.4 67.2 72.0 60.5 NS
 Female27.7 14.6 32.8 28.0 37.4 NS
Ethnicity (%)
 Indigenous0.0 0.0 7.5 50 65 0.05
 Nonindigenous100 100 92.5 50 35 0.05
Education level (%)
 Primary66.760.462.787.989.30.05
 Secondary33.327.122.49.75.8NS
 Postsecondary0.012.514.92.44.9NS
 Primary66.760.462.787.989.30.05
HH size
 Number 9.0 ± 2.4 10.1 ± 3.19.8 ± 2.68.9 ± 3.07.3 ± 3.6 NS
 Adult equivalent4.9 ± 1.46.0 ± 1.8 5.7 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.93.3 ± 1.6NS
Land size and use
 Land size (Ha) 2.5 ± 1.22.1 ± 0.82.1 ± 0.91.7 ± 1.41.9 ± 1.5NS
 Natural forest0.4 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.30.00
 Planted forest0.4 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.2NS
 Food crops0.8 ± 0.40.7 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.70.8 ± 0.5NS
 Cash crop0.5 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.70.017
 Pasture land0.6 ± 0.60.3 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.60.8 ± 0.70.00
 Wastelands0.4 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.2NS
Resident years 24.8 ± 2.023.0 ± 1.813.6 ± 5.414.8 ± 2.716.2 ± 4.5NS
Food months 3.6 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.34.4 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.2 NS
Age of HH (years)44.8 ± 2.048.5 ± 1.940.3 ± 1.642.3 ± 1.442.4 ± 0.7 0.05
Household cash incomes (KES)
 Total170,075.85 ± 19,237.75259,363.80 ± 21,404.55203,385.34 ± 9,506.64212,286.69 ± 10,677.74247,952.86 ± 9,448.390.01
 Agriculture 48,965.52 ± 7,841.7956,545.45 ± 7,899.3065,530.30 ± 5,140.0173,305.08 ± 4,626.8958,817.39 ± 4,161.960.05
 Livestock60,644.82 ± 7,599.5486,521.67 ± 8,955.2262,231.34 ± 4,571.4137,007.90 ± 3,642.5951,899.66 ± 4,710.230.01
 Forest product18,666.67 ± 15,666.677,937.50 ± 2,161.155,100.00 ± 1,805.5525,982.14 ± 8,182.0619,720.00 ± 3,335.93NS
 Off farm 127,789.65 ± 15,021.36141,563.11 ± 12,708.57130,873.13 ± 6,702.83119,698.18 ± 7,509.90114,714.56 ± 6,988.97NS

LSD is least significant difference; NS denotes no significant difference at % level.
Household incomes means (row) with a common superscript imply the mean difference is not significant at % level.
” refers to significance level at 5%; “” denotes significance at 1%.