International Journal of Forestry Research / 2016 / Article / Tab 6 / Research Article
Livelihoods and Welfare Impacts of Forest Comanagement Table 6 Factors affecting how much households’ willingness to pay a membership fee to participate in comanagement programme in Zomba and Ntchisi districts (in Malawi Kwacha).
OLS model Tobit model Coefficients Bootstrapped Std. errors Coefficients Bootstrapped Std. errors District (1 = Ntchisi, 0 = Zomba) −697.60 (304.77) −646.07 (347.16) Household size (number of adults and children) −11.56 (44.93) −26.00 (56.93) Wealth indicator (ordinal scale, 4–11) 298.69 (132.17) 412.54 (191.84) Gender of household head (1 = female, 0 = male) −520.47 (322.91) −610.48 (−587.61) Number of years in school −15.41 (73.70) −32.15 (79.03) Married (1 = yes, 0 = no) 146.18 (128.76) 210.23 (152.19) Age of household head (in years) −4.66 (17.73) −11.26 (21.29) Committee member (1 = yes, 0 = no) −366.79 (269.37) −280.87 (318.15) Land size (in hectares) 60.59 (35.10) 89.54 (48.23) Perceived overall impact dummy (1 = benefiting, 0 = not benefiting) 172.68 (338.46) 333.89 (421.54) _cons −15.13 (690.11) −1479.25 (1293.83) sigma_cons 2736.98 (831.17) Prob > chi2 0.01 0.02 Number 213 213 -squared0.07 Root MSE 2435.68 Pseudo 0.01 Log likelihood −1599.19
Significance levels ( : 10%; : 5%; and : 0.01%).