Research Article
Allometric Models for Estimating Tree Volume and Aboveground Biomass in Lowland Forests of Tanzania
Table 7
Evaluation of the selected general and site specific models for tree total, branches, and stem biomass.
| Type | Section | Selected model | Prediction error% | Model efficiency | Dindili | Rondo | All | Dindili | Rondo | All |
| General | Total tree biomass | 7 | −1.26 | 53 | 50.28 | 0.81 | −0.61 | −0.10 | 9 | −6.59 | 60 | 53.12 | 0.83 | 0.87 | −0.25 | 10 | −14.97 | 19.10 | 2.06 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.87 | Chave et al., 2014 [12] | −12.59 | 23.24 | −5.33 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
Masota, 2015 [34] | 25.07 | 151.30 | 88.1 | 0.84 | −1.78 | −0.84 | Branches biomass | 6 | −13.58 | 80 | 56.66 | 0.60 | −0.47 | −0.02 | 8 | −13.96 | 87 | 56.68 | 0.60 | −0.47 | −0.02 | 10 | −14.87 | 47.17 | 16.16 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.74 | Stem biomass | 6 | −23.46 | 38 | −4.40 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 9 | −21.95 | 29.96 | 4.32 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 10 | 9.17 | 23.57 | 16.37 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
| Site specific (regional) | Total tree biomass | 6 | 5.16 | — | — | 0.94 | — | — | 7 | — | 6.47 | — | — | 0.72 | — | 8 | — | −1.26 | — | — | 0.77 | — | 9 | 1.68 | — | — | 0.94 | — | — | 10 | 3.75 | 4.31 | — | 0.88 | 0.93 | — | Branches biomass | 6 | 4.82 | — | — | 0.87 | — | — | 7 | — | 11.80 | — | — | 0.65 | — | 8 | 4.62 | −4.00 | — | 0.88 | 0.76 | — | 10 | 5.89 | 7.14 | — | 0.69 | 0.69 | — | Stem biomass | 6 | 9.06 | 9.39 | — | 0.83 | 0.72 | — | 8 | 7.07 | 7.17 | — | 0.93 | 0.80 | — | 10 | 17.52 | 12.73 | — | 0.71 | 0.91 | — |
|
|
The best selected models are in bold and italic. Significantly different from zero ().
|