Evaluating Sensitivity of the Ranking of Forest Fuel Treatments to Manager’s Risk Attitudes and the Importance of Treatment Objectives, Montana, USA

<div>Plot of CE values for Plum Creek for weight scenario PC1 and ARAC interval <span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.439pt" id="M112" style="vertical-align:-2.15067pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 4.60146 11.439" width="4.60146pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M290 -163V-135C183 -126 181 -122 181 -44V583C181 662 184 666 290 675V703H120V-163H290Z"></path></g></svg>.</span>02, .04].</div>

International Journal of Forestry Research

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Evaluating Sensitivity of the Ranking of Forest Fuel Treatments to Manager’s Risk Attitudes and the Importance of Treatment Objectives, Montana, USA 

Figure 2 | Evaluating Sensitivity of the Ranking of Forest Fuel Treatments to Manager’s Risk Attitudes and the Importance of Treatment Objectives, Montana, USA 