Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Comparative and Functional Genomics
Volume 2012, Article ID 546930, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/546930
Research Article

Correlation of Aquaporins and Transmembrane Solute Transporters Revealed by Genome-Wide Analysis in Developing Maize Leaf

1College of Information Sciences and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, Taian 271018, China
2State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, Taian 271018, China

Received 17 April 2012; Revised 3 August 2012; Accepted 12 August 2012

Academic Editor: Soraya E. Gutierrez

Copyright © 2012 Xun Yue et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Majeran, B. Zybailov, A. J. Ytterberg, J. Dunsmore, Q. Sun, and K. J. van Wijk, “Consequences of C4 differentiation for chloroplast membrane proteomes in maize mesophyll and bundle sheat cells,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1609–1638, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. H. Danielson and U. Johanson, “Unexpected complexity of the Aquaporin gene family in the moss Physcomitrella patens,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 8, article 45, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Maurel, “Plant aquaporins: novel functions and regulation properties,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 12, pp. 2227–2236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Ward, P. Maser, and J. I. Schroeder, “Plant ion channels: gene families, physiology, and functional genomics analyses,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 71, pp. 59–82, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbó, D. T. Hanson et al., “Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo,” Plant Journal, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 427–439, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. U. Ludewig and M. Dynowski, “Plant aquaporin selectivity: where transport assays, computer simulations and physiology meet,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 66, no. 19, pp. 3161–3175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. K. Azad, N. Yoshikawa, T. Ishikawa, Y. Sawa, and H. Shibata, “Substitution of a single amino acid residue in the aromatic/arginine selectivity filter alters the transport profiles of tonoplast aquaporin homologs,” Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 1818, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Hove and M. Bhave, “Plant aquaporins with non-aqua functions: deciphering the signature sequences,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 75, no. 4-5, pp. 413–430, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. V. Obroucheva and I. A. Sin'kevich, “Aquaporins and cell growth,” Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 153–165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Bräutigam, S. Hoffmann-Benning, and A. P. M. Weber, “Comparative proteomics of chloroplast envelopes from C3 and C4 plants reveals specific adaptations of the plastid envelope to C4 photosynthesis and candidate proteins required for maintaining C4 metabolite fluxes,” Plant Physiology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 568–579, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Covshoff, W. Majeran, P. Liu, J. M. Kolkman, K. J. Van Wijk, and T. P. Brutnell, “Deregulation of maize C4 photosynthetic development in a mesophyll cell-defective mutant,” Plant Physiology, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 1469–1481, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Friso, W. Majeran, M. Huang, Q. Sun, and K. J. van Wijk, “Reconstruction of metabolic pathways, protein expression, and homeostasis machineries across maize bundle sheath and mesophyll chloroplasts: large-scale quantitative proteomics using the first maize genome assembly,” Plant Physiology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1219–1250, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Breeze, E. Harrison, S. McHattie et al., “High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation,” Plant Cell, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 873–894, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Liu, L. Lin, P. Jiang, D. Wang, and Y. Xing, “A comparison of RNA-Seq and high-density exon array for detecting differential gene expression between closely related species,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 578–588, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Wang, M. Gerstein, and M. Snyder, “RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Matthieu, K. Thorsten, J. M. Anthony, V. Jean-Luc, P. Thomas, and F. Wieland, “Developmental pattern of aquaporin expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4127–4142, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Pinghua, P. Lalit, and G. Neeru, “The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1060–1067, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Usadel, T. Obayashi, M. Mutwil et al., “Co-expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1633–1651, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. Lee, B. Ambaru, P. Thakkar, E. M. Marcotte, and S. Y. Rhee, “Rational association of genes with traits using a genome-scale gene network for Arabidopsis thaliana,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. W. Bassel, H. Lan, E. Glaab et al., “Genome-wide network model capturing seed germination reveals coordinated regulation of plant cellular phase transitions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 23, pp. 9709–9714, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Mutwil, S. Klie, T. Tohge et al., “PlaNet: combined sequence and expression comparisons across plant networks derived from seven species,” Plant Cell, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 895–910, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. B. George, G. Enrico, and M. Julietta, “Functional network construction in arabidopsis using rule-based machine learning on large-scale data sets,” The Plant Cell, vol. 23, pp. 3101–3116, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. M. Brady and N. J. Provart, “Web-queryable large-scale data sets for hypothesis generation in plant biology,” Plant Cell, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1034–1051, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Ruan, A. K. Dean, and W. Zhang, “A general co-expression network-based approach to gene expression analysis: comparison and applications,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 4, article 8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. E. Smoot, K. Ono, J. Ruscheinski, P. L. Wang, and T. Ideker, “Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 3, Article ID btq675, pp. 431–432, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Katsuhara, Y. T. Hanba, K. Shiratake, and M. Maeshima, “Expanding roles of plant aquaporins in plasma membranes and cell organelles,” Functional Plant Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Gomes, A. Agasse, P. Thiébaud, S. Delrot, H. Gerós, and F. Chaumont, “Aquaporins are multifunctional water and solute transporters highly divergent in living organisms,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1788, no. 6, pp. 1213–1228, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Chopin, M. Orsel, M. F. Dorbe et al., “The Arabidopsis ATNRT2.7 nitrate transporter controls nitrate content in seeds,” Plant Cell, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1590–1602, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Dynowski, G. Schaaf, D. Loque, O. Moran, and U. Ludewig, “Plant plasma membrane water channels conduct the signalling molecule H2O2,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 414, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Kataoka, N. Hayashi, T. Yamaya, and H. Takahashi, “Root-to-shoot transport of sulfate in Arabidopsis. Evidence for the role of SULTR3;5 as a component of low-affinity sulfate transport system in the root vasculature.,” Plant physiology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 4198–4204, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. Yoshimoto, E. Inoue, K. Saito, T. Yamaya, and H. Takahashi, “Phloem-localizing sulfate transporter, Sultr1;3, mediates re-distribution of sulfur from source to sink organs in arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 1511–1517, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. R. Lewis, G. Wu, K. Ljung, and E. P. Spalding, “Auxin transport into cotyledons and cotyledon growth depend similarly on the ABCB19 Multidrug Resistance-like transporter,” Plant Journal, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Maurel, H. Javot, V. Lauvergeat et al., “Molecular physiology of aquaporins in plants,” International Review of Cytology, vol. 215, pp. 105–148, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Higuchi, S. Suga, T. Tsuchiya et al., “Molecular cloning, water channel activity and tissue specific expression of two isoforms of radish vacuolar aquaporin,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 905–913, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Jeong, C. Cohu, L. Kerkeb, M. Pilon, E. L. Connolly, and M. L. Guerinot, “Chloroplast Fe(III) chelate reductase activity is essential for seedling viability under iron limiting conditions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10619–10624, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Wu, L. Li, J. Du, Y. Yuan, X. Cheng, and H. Q. Ling, “Molecular and biochemical characterization of the Fe(III) chelate reductase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1505–1514, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. L. Fitzpatrick and R. J. Reid, “The involvement of aquaglyceroporins in transport of boron in barley roots,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1357–1365, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Gaspar, A. Bousser, I. Sissoëff, O. Roche, J. Hoarau, and A. Mahé, “Cloning and characterization of ZmPIP1-5b, an aquaporin transporting water and urea,” Plant Science, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Stadler, M. Büttner, P. Ache et al., “Diurnal and light-regulated expression of AtSTP1 in guard cells of Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 528–537, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. M. Sherson, G. Hemmann, G. Wallace et al., “Monosaccharide/proton symporter AtSTP1 plays a major role in uptake and response of Arabidopsis seeds and seedlings to sugars,” Plant Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 849–857, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Wormit, O. Trentmann, I. Feifer et al., “Molecular identification and physiological characterization of a novel monosaccharide transporter from Arabidopsis involved in vacuolar sugar transport,” Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 3476–3490, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. Schaaf, A. Schikora, J. Häberle et al., “A putative function for the Arabidopsis Fe-phytosiderophore transporter homolog AtYSL2 in Fe and Zn homeostasis,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 762–774, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Yokoi, F. J. Quintero, B. Cubero et al., “Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response,” Plant Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 529–539, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Shin, H. S. Shin, G. R. Dewbre, and M. J. Harrison, “Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high-phosphate environments,” Plant Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 629–642, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Misson, M. C. Thibaud, N. Bechtold, K. Raghothama, and L. Nussaume, “Transcriptional regulation and functional properties of Arabidopsis Pht1;4, a high affinity transporter contributing greatly to phosphate uptake in phosphate deprived plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 727–741, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Marmagne, M. Vinauger-Douard, D. Monachello et al., “Two members of the Arabidopsis CLC (chloride channel) family, AtCLCe and AtCLCf, are associated with thylakoid and Golgi membranes, respectively,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3385–3393, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Von Der Fecht-Bartenbach, M. Bogner, M. Dynowski, and U. Ludewig, “CLC-b-mediated no3-/H+ exchange across the tonoplast of arabidopsis vacuoles,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 960–968, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. V. D. Fecht-Bartenbach, M. Bogner, M. Krebs, Y. D. Stierhof, K. Schumacher, and U. Ludewig, “Function of the anion transporter AtCLC-d in the trans-Golgi network,” Plant Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 466–474, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. S. Chiang, G. Stacey, and Y. F. Tsay, “Mechanisms and functional properties of two peptide transporters, AtPTR2 and fPTR2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 29, pp. 30150–30157, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. Song, S. Koh, M. Czako et al., “Antisense expression of the peptide transport gene AtPTR2-B delays flowering and arrests seed development in transgenic Arabidopsis plants,” Plant Physiology, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 927–935, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. O. Cagnac, A. Bourbouloux, D. Chakrabarty, M. Y. Zhang, and S. Delrot, “AtOPT6 transports glutathione derivatives and is induced by primisulfuron,” Plant Physiology, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 1378–1387, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Reinders, J. A. Panshyshyn, and J. M. Ward, “Analysis of transport activity of Arabidopsis sugar alcohol permease homolog AtPLT5,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 1594–1602, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Nieves-Cordones, F. Alemán, V. Martínez, and F. Rubio, “The Arabidopsis thaliana HAK5 K+ transporter is required for plant growth and K+ acquisition from low K+ solutions under saline conditions,” Molecular Plant, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 326–333, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. F. Rubio, F. Alemán, M. Nieves-Cordones, and V. Martínez, “Studies on Arabidopsis athak5, atakt1 double mutants disclose the range of concentrations at which AtHAK5, AtAKT1 and unknown systems mediate K+ uptake,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 220–228, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. I. Hwang, H. Sze, and J. F. Harper, “A calcium-dependent protein kinase can inhibit a calmodulin-stimulated Ca2+ pump (ACA2) located in the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 6224–6229, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus